Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
86 3. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS IN ENGLISH<br />
4.5. Complementizer. The issue whether the complementizer has<br />
any semantic value is only relevant for to-PVCs and that-PVCs. In<br />
section 3, I classi ed the <strong>in</strong> nitival to as a particle s<strong>in</strong>ce it is not a<br />
complementizer like that. The complementizer that carries no dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>g. Its role is to <strong>in</strong>dicate that the follow<strong>in</strong>g complement clause<br />
is subord<strong>in</strong>ate to and connected with the ma<strong>in</strong> clause. That typically<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduces a clause. More speci cally, that creates a dependent<br />
proposition denot<strong>in</strong>g expression (Jespersen, 1940; Portner, 1991;<br />
Radford, 1997). In present day English to carries an unclear semantic<br />
value. `After see and hear [the to-<strong>in</strong> nitive] may be used when<br />
these <strong>verb</strong>s do not denote the immediate sense-perception, but rather<br />
a logical conclusion...;' Jespersen (1940), 1576. Compare the sense<br />
perception <strong>in</strong> (120) with the <strong>in</strong>ference <strong>in</strong> (121).<br />
(120) Ihave seen hastier people than you stay all night.<br />
Jespersen (1940), p. 280<br />
(121) I see this to be true. Jespersen (1940), p. 280<br />
In cases where a matrix predicate can take either that-<strong>complements</strong><br />
or to-<strong>in</strong> nitives, it turns out that the predicate of a to-<strong>in</strong> nitive often<br />
characterizes its logical subject while that-complement clauses present<br />
neutral reports.<br />
`With nd, as with believe, objectively viewed propositions about<br />
empirically veri able, either-or matters of fact are most appropriate<br />
<strong>in</strong> that clauses, but when nd is used to describe someone's personal<br />
experience or judgment, an <strong>in</strong> nitive is more appropriate.' Bork<strong>in</strong><br />
(1984), 56<br />
(122) a. When I looked <strong>in</strong> the les, I found that she was Mexican.<br />
b. ?When I looked <strong>in</strong> the les, I found her to be Mexican.<br />
Bork<strong>in</strong> (1984), 56<br />
(123) a. ?I nd that Harry is amus<strong>in</strong>g, although everyone else th<strong>in</strong>ks<br />
he's a bore.<br />
b. I nd Harry (to be) amus<strong>in</strong>g, although everyone else<br />
th<strong>in</strong>ks he's a bore. Bork<strong>in</strong> (1984), 56<br />
Regard<strong>in</strong>g perception constructions the same observations apply: that-<br />
PVCs are used when the proposition is neutral and veri able, while<br />
to-PVCs are used when the speaker wants to convey a more subjectively<br />
oriented attitude or evaluative judgment(Monnich, 1992b; Hegarty,<br />
1991):