Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 3<br />
<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>verb</strong> <strong>complements</strong> <strong>in</strong> English<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The purpose of this chapter is to provide a description of PVCs <strong>in</strong><br />
English. The structural and semantic characterization of English PVCs<br />
serves as the basis of comparison for the description of PVCs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> chapter 5. The description of English PVCs is not exhaustive because<br />
it is beyond the scope of this thesis to discuss all properties relevant<br />
to PVCs <strong>in</strong> English. The theoretical implications and problems that<br />
have been discussed <strong>in</strong> connection with various properties of English<br />
PVCs are left for the reader to explore <strong>in</strong> the extensive literature. 1 The<br />
structure of the chapter is as follows.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>troduction provides an overview of the structural and semantic<br />
types (sections 1.1 and 1.2) that were identi ed for the <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />
of PVCs <strong>in</strong> chapters 1 and 2. Furthermore, the hypotheses regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the correlations between structural types of PVC and semantic types<br />
stated <strong>in</strong> the rst twochapters of this thesis are restated with respect to<br />
English PVCs (section 1.3). In section 2, I <strong>in</strong>vestigate di erent PV and<br />
non-PV matrix predicates of the ve PVCtypes and the INOM complement,<br />
which was added to the description of PVC types for means<br />
of comparison. In the next two sections, 3 and 4, structural and semantic<br />
descriptions of the PVC types are presented. In the conclusion<br />
(section 5), I reconsider the hypotheses stated <strong>in</strong> section 1.3. Based<br />
on the results, I classify the ve di erent PVCtypes <strong>in</strong> English with<strong>in</strong><br />
Noonan's typology of complementation (Noonan, 1985), which was<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> chapter 2. The typology of complementation serves as the<br />
basis for the typology of PVCs that is developed <strong>in</strong> chapter 6.<br />
1.1. Structural types. In English, there are at least eleven different<br />
PVCtypes (Berman, 1998). F<strong>in</strong>ite complement clauses with<br />
the optional complementizer that, <strong>in</strong>terrogative and ad<strong>verb</strong>ial clauses,<br />
full and naked <strong>in</strong> nitives, present and past participles, AdjPs, PPs,<br />
1 Among others Barwise & Perry (1983); Bol<strong>in</strong>ger (1974); Declerck<br />
(1983); Dretske (1969); Felser (1995); Gee (1975, 1977); Higg<strong>in</strong>botham<br />
(1994b); Kirsner & Thompson (1976); Mittwoch (1990); Vendler (1967).<br />
49