Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
122 4. AKATEK, A `TYPICAL' MAYAN LANGUAGE<br />
(78) tol i'-b'il-;<br />
s-paj jun juun<br />
because carry-PASS/PF-B3 A3-reply one paper<br />
tu' w-uu<br />
DEM A1-by<br />
`Because the reply to the letter has been brought byme.' Penalosa & Say (1992)<br />
17. `Passive' is generally marked <strong>in</strong> the <strong>verb</strong>al morphology.<br />
This has already been illustrated <strong>in</strong> examples (76), (77), and<br />
(78).<br />
18. VOS <strong>language</strong>s generally do not have overt copulas.<br />
There are no copulas <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>. To <strong>in</strong>dicate person and<br />
number, set B a xes are simply su xed to nouns and adjectives<br />
as illustrated with the adjective ikis `alive' <strong>in</strong> example (78).<br />
(79) aw-uu xan ikis-on on<br />
A2-by thus alive-B1p CL1p<br />
`Because of you, we are alive.' Penalosa & Say (1992)<br />
Similar to the VOS <strong>language</strong> Tzeltal, the VXY <strong>language</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong><br />
conforms to almost all of the syntactic properties of VOS <strong>language</strong>s<br />
established <strong>in</strong> Keenan (1978). The only two exceptions are causatives<br />
and postpositions. It appears that Keenan's generalizations can be extended<br />
to VXY and VSO <strong>language</strong>s, even though I have not shown this<br />
for a VSO <strong>language</strong>. The fact that <strong>Akatek</strong> conforms to the syntactic<br />
characteristics of VOS <strong>language</strong>s supports the reconstruction of proto<br />
<strong>Mayan</strong> word order as VOS where marked Os are reordered to VSO.<br />
The cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic realization of case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
its <strong>in</strong>stantiation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s is the topic of the follow<strong>in</strong>g section.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>vestigation of case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g is a prerequisite to<br />
the analysis of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> grammatical relations typology<br />
which follows <strong>in</strong> section 2.5.<br />
2.3. Case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g. Based on Croft (1990),<br />
I de ne case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way:<br />
1. A case marker is a morpheme that refers to the grammatical<br />
relation that holds between the noun phrase and the <strong>verb</strong>.<br />
2. Agreement is a morpheme that refers to the subject (DO, IO,<br />
Oblique) itself.<br />
Both case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g express a relation between two<br />
entities (Croft, 1988). Case mark<strong>in</strong>g is a relational strategy, it establishes<br />
the l<strong>in</strong>k between noun phrase and <strong>verb</strong>. Agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g, on