05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 4. AKATEK, A `TYPICAL' MAYAN LANGUAGE<br />

(78) tol i'-b'il-;<br />

s-paj jun juun<br />

because carry-PASS/PF-B3 A3-reply one paper<br />

tu' w-uu<br />

DEM A1-by<br />

`Because the reply to the letter has been brought byme.' Penalosa & Say (1992)<br />

17. `Passive' is generally marked <strong>in</strong> the <strong>verb</strong>al morphology.<br />

This has already been illustrated <strong>in</strong> examples (76), (77), and<br />

(78).<br />

18. VOS <strong>language</strong>s generally do not have overt copulas.<br />

There are no copulas <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>. To <strong>in</strong>dicate person and<br />

number, set B a xes are simply su xed to nouns and adjectives<br />

as illustrated with the adjective ikis `alive' <strong>in</strong> example (78).<br />

(79) aw-uu xan ikis-on on<br />

A2-by thus alive-B1p CL1p<br />

`Because of you, we are alive.' Penalosa & Say (1992)<br />

Similar to the VOS <strong>language</strong> Tzeltal, the VXY <strong>language</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong><br />

conforms to almost all of the syntactic properties of VOS <strong>language</strong>s<br />

established <strong>in</strong> Keenan (1978). The only two exceptions are causatives<br />

and postpositions. It appears that Keenan's generalizations can be extended<br />

to VXY and VSO <strong>language</strong>s, even though I have not shown this<br />

for a VSO <strong>language</strong>. The fact that <strong>Akatek</strong> conforms to the syntactic<br />

characteristics of VOS <strong>language</strong>s supports the reconstruction of proto<br />

<strong>Mayan</strong> word order as VOS where marked Os are reordered to VSO.<br />

The cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic realization of case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

its <strong>in</strong>stantiation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s is the topic of the follow<strong>in</strong>g section.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>vestigation of case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g is a prerequisite to<br />

the analysis of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> grammatical relations typology<br />

which follows <strong>in</strong> section 2.5.<br />

2.3. Case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g. Based on Croft (1990),<br />

I de ne case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way:<br />

1. A case marker is a morpheme that refers to the grammatical<br />

relation that holds between the noun phrase and the <strong>verb</strong>.<br />

2. Agreement is a morpheme that refers to the subject (DO, IO,<br />

Oblique) itself.<br />

Both case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g express a relation between two<br />

entities (Croft, 1988). Case mark<strong>in</strong>g is a relational strategy, it establishes<br />

the l<strong>in</strong>k between noun phrase and <strong>verb</strong>. Agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g, on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!