05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200 5. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS IN AKATEK<br />

3.4.8. Summary. As non-perception matrix predicates of type2 <strong>complements</strong><br />

I identi ed aspectual <strong>verb</strong>s, non<strong>verb</strong>al predicates, the auxiliary<br />

un `do', <strong>verb</strong>s of ability, motion <strong>verb</strong>s and CVs. In addition, type2<br />

<strong>complements</strong> occur after the conjunction katu' `and then'.<br />

3.5. Summary. In this section I have provided a detailed description<br />

of type2 PVCs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>. As can be gathered from Table 11, the<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>al type2 PVC shares most of its structural and all of its semantic<br />

characteristics with the nom<strong>in</strong>al PVC type <strong>in</strong> English, PNOM, which<br />

has been described <strong>in</strong> chapter 3. Structurally, both PVC types lack<br />

Table 11. Structural and semantic characteristics of<br />

<strong>Akatek</strong> type2 PVCs compared to English PNOMs<br />

Type2 PVC PNOM<br />

Complement type NMLZ NMLZ<br />

COMP - -<br />

Case/ AGR: <strong>in</strong>tr A GEN GEN<br />

Case/ AGR: trans A GEN GEN<br />

Case/ AGR: trans P ABS of NP<br />

Tense/ Aspect - -<br />

DET/ PL - +<br />

Passive PVC + +<br />

Passive PV: whole PVC + +<br />

Passive PV: PVC subject + -<br />

Cleft: PVC subject + -<br />

Cleft: PVC object + -<br />

Cleft: PVC + +<br />

Semantic type event event<br />

Temporal simultaneity + +<br />

Perceptible predicates + +<br />

Process predicates + +<br />

Negation - -<br />

Sentential ad<strong>verb</strong>s - -<br />

ske' /be able - -<br />

a complementizer, mark their subjects with the genitive, and do not<br />

admit aspect or tense mark<strong>in</strong>g, while passivization and cleft<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

whole PVC is grammatical. The two nom<strong>in</strong>alizations di er <strong>in</strong> object<br />

mark<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>Akatek</strong> type2 PVC marks the object as a core argument<br />

with absolutive agreement, PNOM encodes the logical direct object as<br />

an oblique object <strong>in</strong> the form of a PP with the preposition of. The<br />

second ma<strong>in</strong> structural di erence is that - as opposed to type2 PVCs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!