Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. TYPES OF MEANING EXTENSION 31<br />
b. I heard that Mary smoked grass: True, as long as the<br />
source of <strong>in</strong>formation is not questionable.<br />
c. I feel that she has burned the cake: Uncerta<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Viberg (1984), 157<br />
The passive PVs see, hear, and feel -aswell as the copulative PVs<br />
look like, sound like, feel like - are used <strong>in</strong> English to express sensory<br />
evidence (Chafe, 1986). As opposed to PVs embedd<strong>in</strong>g nite that<strong>complements</strong>,<br />
however, passive PVs with <strong>in</strong>g-clauses as <strong>complements</strong><br />
express a high degree of certa<strong>in</strong>ty no matter which PV is used:<br />
(15) a. I see her com<strong>in</strong>g down the hall. ! She's com<strong>in</strong>g down the<br />
hall. Chafe (1986), 267<br />
b. I hear her tak<strong>in</strong>g a shower. ! She's tak<strong>in</strong>g a shower.<br />
Chafe (1986), 267<br />
c. I feel someth<strong>in</strong>g crawl<strong>in</strong>g up my leg. ! Someth<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
crawl<strong>in</strong>g up my leg. Chafe (1986), 267<br />
As a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary generalization, a <strong>verb</strong> higher up <strong>in</strong> the hierarchy<br />
expresses a cognitive mean<strong>in</strong>g that carries a higher degree of certa<strong>in</strong>ty<br />
than a <strong>verb</strong> lower <strong>in</strong> the hierarchy. One way to expla<strong>in</strong> this observation<br />
is that human communication is transmitted through the senses<br />
of vision, hear<strong>in</strong>g and marg<strong>in</strong>ally also touch, while the senses of<br />
smell and taste do not serve this purpose. Not even <strong>in</strong> cultures<br />
where the senses of smell and taste play an important social role do<br />
they extend their mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the cognitive doma<strong>in</strong> as for example<br />
<strong>in</strong> Warlpiri (Caplan, 1973). This claim is opposed to Viberg's crossl<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
observations presented <strong>in</strong> Table 3 and the observation that<br />
<strong>in</strong> English smell and taste can take abstract NP <strong>complements</strong>. Viberg<br />
observed cognitive extensions for all ve sense modalities, while `social'<br />
extensions seem to be restricted to vision, hear<strong>in</strong>g and touch. 6<br />
There is a neuro-anatomical explanation for the division between<br />
vision, hear<strong>in</strong>g, and touch on the one hand and smell and taste<br />
on the other (Caplan, 1973). Information obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the senses of<br />
smell and taste is perceived via di erent neuro-anatomical pathways<br />
than <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the senses of vision, hear<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
6 In German there is an extension from nicht riechen konnen `not be able to<br />
smell' to `dislike a person':<br />
(i) Sie kann ihn nicht riechen.<br />
she can.3s him not smell<br />
`She cannot stand him.'