05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 3. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS IN ENGLISH<br />

b. *I saw the farmer hope for ra<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Higg<strong>in</strong>botham (1994a), 31<br />

The second requirement regard<strong>in</strong>g the PVC predicate is that events<br />

require some sort of transformation or change over time that can be<br />

observed. Whereas proposition denot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>complements</strong> can conta<strong>in</strong><br />

predicates express<strong>in</strong>g perceptible or imperceptible endur<strong>in</strong>g states, this<br />

is impossible for purely event denot<strong>in</strong>g complement types. For example,<br />

(100-a) expresses a perceptible permanent state <strong>in</strong> form of a<br />

that-PVC. The same cannot be conveyed via an NI-PVC as shown <strong>in</strong><br />

the ungrammaticality of (100-b). An NI-PVC accepts predicates express<strong>in</strong>g<br />

actions like fall <strong>in</strong> example (100-c).<br />

(100) a. Isaw that the lamp stood on the table.<br />

b. *I saw the lamp stand on the table.<br />

Akmajian (1977), 440<br />

c. Isaw the lamp fall o the table.<br />

Temporary state predicates with the <strong>in</strong>herent possibility for transformation<br />

or change can also be event denot<strong>in</strong>g, i.e. occur <strong>in</strong> NI-PVC,<br />

as shown <strong>in</strong> examples (101-a) and (101-b).<br />

(101) a. Isaw John stand on the table. Akmajian (1977), 440<br />

b. Isaw John sit <strong>in</strong> his usual place. Mittwoch (1990), 105<br />

The observation that predicates like be illare ungrammatical with NI-<br />

PVCs and <strong>in</strong>g-PVCs but grammatical with to- and that-PVCs supports<br />

the analysis that NI-PVCs must be <strong>in</strong>terpretable as events:<br />

(102) a. *I observed John be(<strong>in</strong>g) ill.<br />

b. I observed John to be ill.<br />

c. I observed that John was ill. Declerck (1981), 87<br />

In turn, predicates of to-PVCs appear to be restricted to stative<br />

situations as for example <strong>in</strong> (103) and <strong>in</strong> (104). Unmistakably nonstative<br />

situations cannot be expressed by to-PVCs as can be seen <strong>in</strong><br />

examples (105) and (106). 15<br />

(103) Isaw it to produce no bad e ects. (= there were none as a<br />

result) Bol<strong>in</strong>ger (1974), 72<br />

15 In passive constructions, however, to-PVCs accept non-stative situations:<br />

(i) She was seen to make friends with everyone. Bol<strong>in</strong>ger (1974), 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!