05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

114 4. AKATEK, A `TYPICAL' MAYAN LANGUAGE<br />

are exible VXY <strong>language</strong>s. Thus, VSO <strong>language</strong>s present the majority<br />

of<strong>verb</strong>-<strong>in</strong>itial <strong>language</strong>s with 77.4%. Only 15.1% of the <strong>verb</strong>-<strong>in</strong>itial<br />

<strong>language</strong>s are VOS, and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 7.5% are VXY as illustrated <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 5.<br />

Table 5. Frequency of V-<strong>in</strong>itial <strong>language</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Hawk<strong>in</strong>s (1983)<br />

Word order No. of <strong>language</strong>s % of total % of V-<strong>in</strong>itial<br />

VSO 41 12.2 77.4<br />

VOS 8 2.4 15.1<br />

VXY 4 1.2 7.5<br />

Total V-<strong>in</strong>itial 53 15.8 100<br />

Total sample 336 100<br />

Historically, Proto-<strong>Mayan</strong> word order (Norman & Campbell,<br />

1978; England, 1991) was VOS with pre<strong>verb</strong>al positions for topic<br />

and cleft and a post<strong>verb</strong>al position for reordered objects, which had to<br />

be marked (i.e. complex, animate or de nite):<br />

(58) a. TOPIC CLEFT [VOS]<br />

b. TOPIC CLEFT [VS] reordered-O<br />

The historical reconstruction above allows to derive all non-basic argument<br />

orders that occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s: Topicalization and cleft<strong>in</strong>g<br />

processes render OSV, SOV, SVO, and OVS, while reorder<strong>in</strong>g of the O<br />

generates VSO.<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g I present evidence <strong>in</strong> favor of the claim that lexical<br />

arguments are avoided. First of all, besides the generally low number<br />

of transitives with two lexical NPs <strong>in</strong> all <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s, <strong>language</strong>s<br />

with a exible word order restrict the co-occurrence of two lexical NPs<br />

even more. Second, if one NP is lexically <strong>in</strong>stantiated, xed word order<br />

<strong>language</strong>s prefer the argument which is next to the <strong>verb</strong> with<strong>in</strong> the word<br />

order pattern over the nal argument <strong>in</strong> the order pattern. The results<br />

of Schule (1996) as presented <strong>in</strong> Table 6 <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>in</strong> a xed VSO<br />

<strong>language</strong> VS constructions are preferred over VO constructions.<br />

Table 6 shows that <strong>in</strong> narrative texts of the xed word order <strong>language</strong>s<br />

Jakaltek and San Mateo Chuj, the frequency of transitive clauses<br />

with third person subject and object NPs is a mere 18.1% for Jakaltek<br />

and 18.6% for San Mateo Chuj while <strong>in</strong> the exible word order <strong>language</strong><br />

<strong>Akatek</strong> this number dw<strong>in</strong>dles down to 4.2 %. Look<strong>in</strong>g at the <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

distribution of cases where <strong>in</strong> transitive constructions with third person<br />

subject and object only one argument is lexically expressed, <strong>in</strong><br />

the VSO <strong>language</strong> Jakaltek a tendency for subject NP encod<strong>in</strong>g was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!