Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3. CONCLUSION 131<br />
Regard<strong>in</strong>g the parameter of word order, <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s are <strong>verb</strong>rst<br />
(VXY). I have demonstrated that at least the xed VOS and the<br />
exible VOS/VSO <strong>language</strong>s of the <strong>Mayan</strong> family conform to the generalizations<br />
established by Keenan (1978) for VOS <strong>language</strong>s. With<br />
respect to case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g the former occurs only on <strong>in</strong>direct<br />
objects (IO) while the latter is <strong>in</strong>stantiated by pronom<strong>in</strong>al a xes<br />
on the <strong>verb</strong>al complex <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g subject (S) and object (DO). There<br />
is complete identitybetween ergative mark<strong>in</strong>g and possessive mark<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
i.e. trans A is marked on the <strong>verb</strong> via the same set of pronom<strong>in</strong>al<br />
a xes (set A) as the possessor (POSS) on the possessed noun. The<br />
agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g basically follows an ergative pattern and <strong>in</strong> part<br />
of the family splits to an extended ergative pattern under certa<strong>in</strong><br />
conditions.<br />
3. Conclusion<br />
In this chapter I acqua<strong>in</strong>ted the reader with the most salient grammatical<br />
and typological features of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s. I aimed at present<strong>in</strong>g<br />
general characteristics of the <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong> family as well<br />
as speci c features of <strong>Akatek</strong> Maya. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the usual diversities<br />
that exist even with<strong>in</strong> such a homogeneous <strong>language</strong> family, e.g. the<br />
exceptional SVO word order of Chort , <strong>Akatek</strong> can be considered a<br />
representative member of the family. In the case of extended ergativity,<br />
however, it only represents a subgroup of the family, s<strong>in</strong>ce at<br />
least a third of the family members do not exhibit this second mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pattern.<br />
The rst section served as an <strong>in</strong>troduction to basic grammatical<br />
features of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s. In section 1.1, I illustrated the uniqueness<br />
of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s regard<strong>in</strong>g their person mark<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>verb</strong>al as well as <strong>in</strong> non-<strong>verb</strong>al predication, <strong>in</strong> possessive and <strong>in</strong> prepositional<br />
constructions. In section 1.2, I po<strong>in</strong>ted out that <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
pronouns <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong> have developed from noun classi ers, which isan<br />
<strong>in</strong>novation that only took place <strong>in</strong> a subbranch of the family. Also, I<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guished nouns from <strong>verb</strong>s by describ<strong>in</strong>g the di erent structures<br />
of noun phrases and of the <strong>verb</strong>al complex. Section 1.3 served to illustrate<br />
the basic characteristics tense, aspect, aktionsart, modality and<br />
negation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>. It was shown that negation <strong>in</strong>teracts with aspect<br />
and that there is a variety of<strong>verb</strong>al aktionsart and modality markers.<br />
In section 1.4 strategies for the mark<strong>in</strong>g of grammatical relations<br />
were discussed. Nouns as well as pronouns are optional and lack case<br />
mark<strong>in</strong>g while the <strong>verb</strong>al complex by itself constitutes a complete sentence.<br />
In addition, lexical arguments are optional and unmarked for<br />
case. I followed Mithun (1986b) <strong>in</strong> classify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s as