05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. CONCLUSION 131<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g the parameter of word order, <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s are <strong>verb</strong>rst<br />

(VXY). I have demonstrated that at least the xed VOS and the<br />

exible VOS/VSO <strong>language</strong>s of the <strong>Mayan</strong> family conform to the generalizations<br />

established by Keenan (1978) for VOS <strong>language</strong>s. With<br />

respect to case and agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g the former occurs only on <strong>in</strong>direct<br />

objects (IO) while the latter is <strong>in</strong>stantiated by pronom<strong>in</strong>al a xes<br />

on the <strong>verb</strong>al complex <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g subject (S) and object (DO). There<br />

is complete identitybetween ergative mark<strong>in</strong>g and possessive mark<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

i.e. trans A is marked on the <strong>verb</strong> via the same set of pronom<strong>in</strong>al<br />

a xes (set A) as the possessor (POSS) on the possessed noun. The<br />

agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g basically follows an ergative pattern and <strong>in</strong> part<br />

of the family splits to an extended ergative pattern under certa<strong>in</strong><br />

conditions.<br />

3. Conclusion<br />

In this chapter I acqua<strong>in</strong>ted the reader with the most salient grammatical<br />

and typological features of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s. I aimed at present<strong>in</strong>g<br />

general characteristics of the <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong> family as well<br />

as speci c features of <strong>Akatek</strong> Maya. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the usual diversities<br />

that exist even with<strong>in</strong> such a homogeneous <strong>language</strong> family, e.g. the<br />

exceptional SVO word order of Chort , <strong>Akatek</strong> can be considered a<br />

representative member of the family. In the case of extended ergativity,<br />

however, it only represents a subgroup of the family, s<strong>in</strong>ce at<br />

least a third of the family members do not exhibit this second mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pattern.<br />

The rst section served as an <strong>in</strong>troduction to basic grammatical<br />

features of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s. In section 1.1, I illustrated the uniqueness<br />

of <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s regard<strong>in</strong>g their person mark<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>verb</strong>al as well as <strong>in</strong> non-<strong>verb</strong>al predication, <strong>in</strong> possessive and <strong>in</strong> prepositional<br />

constructions. In section 1.2, I po<strong>in</strong>ted out that <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

pronouns <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong> have developed from noun classi ers, which isan<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation that only took place <strong>in</strong> a subbranch of the family. Also, I<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guished nouns from <strong>verb</strong>s by describ<strong>in</strong>g the di erent structures<br />

of noun phrases and of the <strong>verb</strong>al complex. Section 1.3 served to illustrate<br />

the basic characteristics tense, aspect, aktionsart, modality and<br />

negation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>. It was shown that negation <strong>in</strong>teracts with aspect<br />

and that there is a variety of<strong>verb</strong>al aktionsart and modality markers.<br />

In section 1.4 strategies for the mark<strong>in</strong>g of grammatical relations<br />

were discussed. Nouns as well as pronouns are optional and lack case<br />

mark<strong>in</strong>g while the <strong>verb</strong>al complex by itself constitutes a complete sentence.<br />

In addition, lexical arguments are optional and unmarked for<br />

case. I followed Mithun (1986b) <strong>in</strong> classify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Mayan</strong> <strong>language</strong>s as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!