Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 1. INTRODUCTION<br />
visual <strong>in</strong>put. Confusion between the truth implication of a visual perception<br />
expression, i.e. what we see, and the utterance implication,<br />
i.e. what we saywe see, arises especially <strong>in</strong> rst person reports <strong>in</strong> the<br />
present tense. Therefore, the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigation of PVCs concentrates<br />
an third person reports <strong>in</strong> the past tense. The observations made<br />
with respect to our visual ability also apply to our senses of hear<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and touch, but less to our senses of smell and taste. In chapter 2 the<br />
lexicalization and the cognitive extension of PVs across <strong>language</strong>s and<br />
the di erent PVCtypes that occur are discussed.<br />
2. Typology<br />
The central goals of typological researchhave been traditionally the<br />
classi cation of the world's <strong>language</strong>s as presented <strong>in</strong> section 2.1 and<br />
more recently the <strong>in</strong>vestigation of cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic patterns, which is<br />
the topic of section 2.2. Central to the <strong>in</strong>vestigation of cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
patterns are the notion of a l<strong>in</strong>guistic type and the method of crossl<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
comparison. The identi cation of correlative grammatical<br />
properties by means of cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic comparison allows to de ne<br />
l<strong>in</strong>guistic types. The <strong>in</strong>vestigation of cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic patterns is approached<br />
from three di erent perspectives referred to as holistic, partial<br />
and comparative typology. These approaches are presented <strong>in</strong> section<br />
2.3.<br />
2.1. Typological Classi cation. For the typological classi cation<br />
of the world's <strong>language</strong>s, the entire range of variation across <strong>language</strong>s<br />
has to be ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed, i.e. theoretically possible structural types<br />
must be de ned. Once this is done, each <strong>language</strong> is classi ed as one of<br />
the established types. The variation of grammatical mechanisms used<br />
to relate l<strong>in</strong>guistic concepts to each other is highly restricted across<br />
<strong>language</strong>s. This observation constitutes the start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for the classical<br />
typological classi cation of <strong>language</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to isolat<strong>in</strong>g, agglut<strong>in</strong>ative,<br />
<strong>in</strong> ectional and <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g types. The di erent techniques for<br />
encod<strong>in</strong>g relational mean<strong>in</strong>g, i.e. the relation of lexical concepts to<br />
each other, were successively identi ed by Friedrich and August von<br />
Schlegel, Wilhelm von Humboldt and August Schleicher. 3<br />
The isolat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>language</strong> type is characterized by a complete absence<br />
of a xes. Agglut<strong>in</strong>ative <strong>language</strong>s use a xes that denote<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle grammatical categories such asnumber and concatenate the afxes<br />
without phonological changes. Inflectional <strong>language</strong>s, also<br />
referred to as exional or fusional, are characterized by multifunctional<br />
3 For a detailed historical discussion refer to chapter 3 of Greenberg (1974).