05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 5. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS IN AKATEK<br />

The catalogue of structural and semantic criteria used <strong>in</strong> chapter 3<br />

for the characterization of PVCs <strong>in</strong> English is modi ed <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

way. S<strong>in</strong>ce there is no case mark<strong>in</strong>g on NPs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Akatek</strong>, this criterion<br />

is irrelevant for a description of <strong>Akatek</strong> PVCs. Solely the agreement<br />

mark<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>verb</strong> can be employed as a criterion. In addition to tense<br />

and aspect, morphological markers of aktionsart as described <strong>in</strong> chapter<br />

4 are taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration. The dist<strong>in</strong>ction between ad<strong>verb</strong>ials<br />

and adjectives is problematic. The results of cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />

on nom<strong>in</strong>alizations <strong>in</strong>dicate that many <strong>language</strong>s either completely<br />

lack a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between adjectives and ad<strong>verb</strong>s or have only<br />

a m<strong>in</strong>imal one. As a result, the distribution of ad<strong>verb</strong>s and adjectives<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of complement types is highly dependent on the speci c syntactic<br />

structures of the <strong>language</strong> <strong>in</strong> question (Koptjevskaja-Tamm,<br />

1993; Hamm, 1996). In <strong>Akatek</strong>, the dist<strong>in</strong>ction between ad<strong>verb</strong>s and<br />

adjectives is di cult to draw <strong>in</strong>many cases. Due to the fact that this<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction is <strong>in</strong> general highly <strong>language</strong> speci c, it is excluded from the<br />

catalogue of criteria. S<strong>in</strong>ce there is a rich system of non-active voices <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Akatek</strong>, antipassive constructions are added. The above changes result<br />

<strong>in</strong> the revised list of criteria for the description of <strong>Akatek</strong> PVCs shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Criteria for the structural and semantic characterization<br />

of <strong>Akatek</strong> PVCs<br />

Criteria for a structural Criteria for a semantic<br />

characterization characterization<br />

Constituency Temporal simultaneity<br />

Complementizer Perceptibility<br />

Agreement mark<strong>in</strong>g Process vs. state predicates<br />

Tense/Aspect/Aktionsart Sentential negation<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ers/Pluralization Sentential ad<strong>verb</strong>s<br />

Anti-/ Passivization Modal auxiliaries<br />

Cleft Semantic value of COMP<br />

Variety of Matrix predicates<br />

The topic of the follow<strong>in</strong>g section is the lexicalization of PVs <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Akatek</strong>. The purpose of this section is to familiarize the reader with<br />

the PVs that serve as matrix predicates for the two types of PVC,<br />

which are characterized <strong>in</strong> sections 3 and 4, respectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!