05.08.2013 Views

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS 43<br />

As opposed to Horie (1993) and Cristofaro (1998), who dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />

between two basic complement types, Noonan (1985) identi es<br />

six di erent complement types: <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>complements</strong>, subjunctive<br />

<strong>complements</strong>, paratactic <strong>complements</strong>, <strong>in</strong> nitives, nom<strong>in</strong>alizations and<br />

participles.<br />

Indicative (INDs) and subjunctive (SUBs) <strong>complements</strong> are both<br />

sentence-like, subjunctive <strong>complements</strong> occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>language</strong>s that also<br />

have <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>complements</strong>. Subjunctive <strong>complements</strong> di er from<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicatives <strong>in</strong> mood, which can be realized <strong>in</strong> a variety ofways: either<br />

they have a non-<strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>verb</strong> form or conjugation, or they occur<br />

with modal particles or special complementizers. Example (28) shows<br />

an <strong>in</strong>dicative PVC <strong>in</strong> Greek with the complementizer oti (COMP),<br />

which di ers from the subjunctive PVC <strong>in</strong> (29) marked as subjunctive<br />

by the particle na (SP).<br />

(28) Esthanthike [oti i siz tisi tane peritt ]<br />

feel.3s.PT [COMP the discussion be.3s.PT redundant]<br />

`He felt that the discussion was redundant'<br />

Alexia Kallia (p.c.)<br />

(29) Ton vlepo [na kolimba]<br />

ACC3s see.1s.PRES [SP swim.3s.PRES]<br />

`I see him swim.' Alexia Kallia (p.c.)<br />

In paratactic <strong>complements</strong> (PARAs), the notional subject of the complement<br />

does not form a constituent with the complement predicate but<br />

is retrieved from the preced<strong>in</strong>g clause. Paratactic <strong>complements</strong> can be<br />

used as <strong>in</strong>dependent sentences, they cannot take complementizers. An<br />

example for a paratactic PVC <strong>in</strong> Hausa is provided <strong>in</strong> (30).<br />

(30) Na<br />

gan sh [yana aiki]<br />

1sPERF see him [be.at.3s work]<br />

`I saw him, he is work<strong>in</strong>g. (I saw him work<strong>in</strong>g.)'<br />

Noonan (1985), 56<br />

In Noonan's typology of complement types <strong>in</strong> nitives (INFs) are dened<br />

as <strong>verb</strong>-likeentities that lack syntactic relations to their notional<br />

subject. Except for subject agreement and mood, <strong>in</strong> nitive <strong>complements</strong><br />

may be <strong>in</strong> ected for all <strong>verb</strong>al categories such as tense-aspect,<br />

voice, object agreement, etc. Example (31) shows an <strong>in</strong> nitive PVC<strong>in</strong><br />

Spanish.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!