Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

More documents

Recommendations

Info

260 7. CONCLUSION Latin and English.' In: R. Brecht & C. Chvany (eds.), Slavic Transformational syntax, pp. 193{218, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Bricker, V.R. (1981): `The source of the ergative split in Yucatec Maya.' Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2(2): 83{127. Buck, C.D. (1949): A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Bybee, J. (1985): Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bybee, J.L. (1988): `The diachronic dimension in explanation.' In: J.A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, pp. 350{79, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Campbell, L. (1990): `Mayan languages and linguistic change.' In: Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology, de Gruyter. Campbell, L., T. Kaufman & T. Smith-Stark (1986): `Meso- America as a linguistic area.' Language 62: 530{570. Caplan, D. (1973): À Note on the Abstract Reading of Verbs of Perception.' Cognition 2(3): 369{277. Chafe, W. (1986): Èvidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.' In: W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, pp. 261{272, Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corp. Chao, Y.R. (1986): AGrammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Comrie, B. & S. Thompson (1985): `Lexical Nominalization.' In: T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III, Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 349{399, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cooper, W. (1973a): `Primacy Relations among English Sensation Rferents.' Linguistics 137: 5{12. Cooper, W. (1973b): `Syntactic Flexibility among English Sensation Referents.' Linguistics 133: 33{38. Craig, C. (1977): The Structure ofJacaltec. Austin and London: University ofTexas Press. Craig, C.G. (1976a): `Disambiguation and hierarchies in Jacaltec.' In: M. McClaran (ed.), Mayan Linguistics I , pp. 141{160, Los Angeles: University of California, American Indian Studies Center. Craig, C.G. (1976b): `Properties of basic and derived subjects in Jacaltec.' In: C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, New York: AP. Craig, C.G. (1986): `Jacaltec noun classi ers. A study in grammaticalization.' Lingua 70: 241{284.
Bibliography 261 Cristofaro, S. (1998): `Deranking and balancing in di erent subordination relations.' Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 51: 43{94. Croft, W. (1988): Àgreement vs. case marking in direct objects.' In: M. Barlow & C.A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural languages: approaches, theories, descriptions, pp. 159{80, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Croft, W. (1990): Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davies, H.J. (1981): Kobon. Lingua Descriptive Studies, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Dayley, J.P. (1981): `Voice and ergativity inMayan languages.' Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2(2): 3{82. Declerck, R. (1981): Òn the role of progressive aspect in non nite perception verb complements.' Glossa 15: 83{114. Declerck, R. (1982a): `The structure of in nitival perception verb complements in a transformational grammar.' Communication and Cognition 15: 383{406. Declerck, R. (1982b): `The triple origin of participial perception verb complements.' Linguistic Analysis 10: 1{26. Declerck, R. (1983): Òn the passive of in nitival perception verb complements.' Journal of English Linguistics 16: 27{46. Derbyshire, D. (1977): `Word order universals and the existence of OVS languages.' Linguistic Inquiry 8: 590{599. Dik, S. & K. Hengeveld (1991): `The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception verb complements.' Linguistics 29: 231{259. Dixon, R. (1972): The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dixon, R. (1988): AGrammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Dixon, R. (1994): Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dretske, F. (1969): Seeing and Knowing. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Dretske, F.I. (1995): Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge and London: MIT Press. DuBois, J.W. (1987): `The discourse basis of ergativity.' Language 63: 805{855. England, N.C. (1983): Agrammar of Mam. Austin: University of Texas Press. England, N.C. (1991): `Changes in Basic Word Order in Mayan
Page 1 and 2:
Perception verb complements in Akat
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Acknowledgments ix Chapter
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS vii 2.1. Passive perceptio
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments This is the place t
Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Across langu
Page 13 and 14:
1. WHAT WE SEE AND WHAT WESAY WE SE
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
2. TYPOLOGY 9 a xes which incorpora
Page 21 and 22:
2. TYPOLOGY 11 languages hence serv
Page 23 and 24:
2. TYPOLOGY 13 predictions regardin
Page 25 and 26:
3. DATA 15 to be applicable cross-l
Page 27 and 28:
4. METHODOLOGY 17 (1985). The notio
Page 29 and 30:
5. GOALS AND OUTLINE OF CHAPTERS TO
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2 Perception verbs and thei
Page 33 and 34:
1. THE LEXICAL FIELD 23 the perceiv
Page 35 and 36:
2. THE HIERARCHY 25 the complementi
Page 37 and 38:
3. TYPES OF MEANING EXTENSION 27 In
Page 39 and 40:
3. TYPES OF MEANING EXTENSION 29 (H
Page 41 and 42:
3. TYPES OF MEANING EXTENSION 31 b.
Page 43 and 44:
3. TYPES OF MEANING EXTENSION 33 Sw
Page 45 and 46:
4. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS 35 h
Page 47 and 48:
4. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS 37 t
Page 49 and 50:
4. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS 39 T
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
4. PERCEPTION VERB COMPLEMENTS 43 A
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
5. CONCLUSION 47 assumption that PV
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 3 Perception verb complemen
Page 61 and 62:
1. INTRODUCTION 51 terminology in A
Page 63 and 64:
1. INTRODUCTION 53 b. Isaw Mary whi
Page 65 and 66:
1. INTRODUCTION 55 world in the sen
Page 67 and 68:
2. MATRIX PREDICATES 57 Taking up t
Page 69 and 70:
2. MATRIX PREDICATES 59 b. John's s
Page 71 and 72:
2. MATRIX PREDICATES 61 NI compleme
Page 73 and 74:
2. MATRIX PREDICATES 63 with, i.e.
Page 75 and 76:
3. CRITERIA FOR THE STRUCTURAL CHAR
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
4. CRITERIA FOR THE SEMANTIC CHARAC
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
5. CONCLUSION 89 two in nitive (INF
Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 4 Akatek, a `typical' Mayan
Page 103 and 104:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 93 gl
Page 105 and 106:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 95 Th
Page 107 and 108:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 97 Ta
Page 109 and 110:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 99 ob
Page 111 and 112:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 101 b
Page 113 and 114:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 103 T
Page 115 and 116:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 105 i
Page 117 and 118:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 107 P
Page 119 and 120:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 109 (
Page 121 and 122:
1. BASIC GRAMMATICAL FEATURES 111 c
Page 123 and 124:
2. TYPOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 113
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
3. CONCLUSION 131 Regarding the par
Page 143 and 144:
3. CONCLUSION 133 description of Ak
Page 145 and 146:
CHAPTER 5 Perception verb complemen
Page 147 and 148:
1. INTRODUCTION 137 Type3 complemen
Page 149 and 150:
2. LEXICALIZATION OF PERCEPTION VER
Page 151 and 152:
2. LEXICALIZATION OF PERCEPTION VER
Page 153 and 154:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 143 following two
Page 155 and 156:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 145 (21) a. x-;-y-
Page 157 and 158:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 147 (25) a. *x-;-w
Page 159 and 160:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 149 (32) [;-q'anab
Page 161 and 162:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 151 The meaning di
Page 163 and 164:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 153 (46), k'alta',
Page 165 and 166:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 155 (53) a. x-;-y-
Page 167 and 168:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 157 Table 5. Passi
Page 169 and 170:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 159 of (65), `Mica
Page 171 and 172:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 161 (73) a. x-ach-
Page 173 and 174:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 163 (77) ta chi-on
Page 175 and 176:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 165 c. x-;-y-il ix
Page 177 and 178:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 167 in such a cons
Page 179 and 180:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 169 tive and intra
Page 181 and 182:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 171 Example (97) s
Page 183 and 184:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 173 (104) * ja'-;
Page 185 and 186:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 175 the preverbal
Page 187 and 188:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 177 (115) chi-;-y-
Page 189 and 190:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 179 third person a
Page 191 and 192:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 181 3.3.2. Type of
Page 193 and 194:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 183 (130) a. x-;-y
Page 195 and 196:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 185 (137) x-;-y-il
Page 197 and 198:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 187 3.4.1. katu' `
Page 199 and 200:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 189 (147) a. ;-xew
Page 201 and 202:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 191 3.4.3. Nonverb
Page 203 and 204:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 193 3.4.5. Verbs o
Page 205 and 206:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 195 (if realized).
Page 207 and 208:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 197 b. ;-s-chej ix
Page 209 and 210:
3. PVCS OF TYPE2 199 omitted, the t
Page 211 and 212:
4. PVCS OF TYPE1 201 - PNOMs accept
Page 213 and 214:
4. PVCS OF TYPE1 203 not at all. An
Page 215 and 216:
4. PVCS OF TYPE1 205 (193-b) (no as
Page 217 and 218:
4. PVCS OF TYPE1 207 complements, s
Page 219 and 220: 4. PVCS OF TYPE1 209 already shown
Page 221 and 222: 4. PVCS OF TYPE1 211 b. x-;-w-il [t
Page 223 and 224: 4. PVCS OF TYPE1 213 (215) x-;-y-il
Page 225 and 226: 4. PVCS OF TYPE1 215 (221) x-;-y-il
Page 227 and 228: 4. PVCS OF TYPE1 217 c. watx'-; tzu
Page 229 and 230: 4. PVCS OF TYPE1 219 Table 14. Sema
Page 231 and 232: 5. CONCLUSION 221 by the matrix pre
Page 233 and 234: 5. CONCLUSION 223 on passive constr
Page 235 and 236: CHAPTER 6 Typology of perception ve
Page 237 and 238: 1. PVC TYPES 227 subjunctive comple
Page 239 and 240: 2. EVENT DENOTING PVC TYPES 229 2.2
Page 241 and 242: 2. EVENT DENOTING PVC TYPES 231 (13
Page 243 and 244: 2. EVENT DENOTING PVC TYPES 233 Nom
Page 245 and 246: 2. EVENT DENOTING PVC TYPES 235 Ger
Page 247 and 248: 3. PROPOSITION DENOTING PVC TYPES 2
Page 253 and 254: 4. TYPOLOGICAL CORRELATIONS 243 esp
Page 255 and 256: 4. TYPOLOGICAL CORRELATIONS 245 Que
Page 257 and 258: CHAPTER 7 Conclusion In this thesis
Page 259 and 260: 3. INTERPRETATION OF PVC TYPES 249
Page 261 and 262: 4. TYPOLOGY OF PVC SYSTEMS 251 deno
Page 263 and 264: 5. NON-PV MATRIX PREDICATES 253 The
Page 265 and 266: ABBREVIATIONS 255 Abbreviations ; z
Page 267 and 268: ABBREVIATIONS 257 PART participle P
Page 269: Bibliography 259 Bibliography Abney
Page 273 and 274: Bibliography 263 category.' In: M.
Page 275 and 276: Bibliography 265 Li, C.N. & S.A. Th
Page 277 and 278: Bibliography 267 1: 82{86, Reprinte
show all

Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?