Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. CRITERIA FOR THE SEMANTIC CHARACTERIZATION 81<br />
4. Can the PVC be modi ed by sentential ad<strong>verb</strong>s or modal auxiliaries?<br />
5. What - if any - is the semantic value of the complementizer?<br />
4.1. Temporal simultaneity. Events can only be perceived at<br />
the moment they happen. In other words, the perception of the event<br />
necessarily needs to take place at the same time the event takes place.<br />
This is achieved either by a complete absence of tense or aspect mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> the complement as <strong>in</strong> the NI-PVC <strong>in</strong> English or by the aspectual<br />
speci cation [+progressive] of <strong>in</strong>g-PVCs stipulated <strong>in</strong> section 3.<br />
NI-PVCs, <strong>in</strong>g-PVCs and PNOMs exhibit no <strong>in</strong>dependent time reference,<br />
while INOMs, to-PVCs and that-PVCs-aswas already observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> section 3 - can have tense or aspect mark<strong>in</strong>g that is <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
from the tense or aspect mark<strong>in</strong>g of the matrix clause. In other words,<br />
the latter three complement types do not necessarily have to be cotemporal<br />
with their matrix predicate.<br />
That-PVCs can, but do not have to be, co-temporal with their matrix<br />
predicates. Provided that the content ofathat-PVC aswell as its<br />
temporal speci cation allow anevent <strong>in</strong>terpretation, the progressive<br />
form be V-<strong>in</strong>g of the complement <strong>verb</strong> facilitates such a read<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
(97) John hears that Mary is shout<strong>in</strong>g. Caplan (1973), 270<br />
In other words, the sentence <strong>in</strong> (97) denotes non-epistemic auditory<br />
perception of an event as well as epistemic or abstract, mental perception<br />
of a proposition (Dretske, 1969; Caplan, 1973).<br />
4.2. Predicate type. There are two requirements a PVC type's<br />
predicate must ful ll <strong>in</strong> order for the PVC typetobeevent denot<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The rst requirement is that the PVC must express someth<strong>in</strong>g perceptible.<br />
In other words, we can only see, hear, feel, smell and taste<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> events. For example, unlike bleed<strong>in</strong>g, hurt<strong>in</strong>g is not accessible<br />
to the sense of vision, while we can see other people look, but not feel<br />
a certa<strong>in</strong> way.<br />
(98) a. The doctor watched my foot bleed<strong>in</strong>g/*hurt<strong>in</strong>g badly.<br />
Akmajian (1977), 445<br />
b. We saw them look<strong>in</strong>g/*feel<strong>in</strong>g pretty sick.<br />
Akmajian (1977), 445<br />
Mental states are <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically imperceptible and therefore cannot function<br />
as predicates of <strong>in</strong>g-PVCs or NI-PVCs:<br />
(99) a. *I saw John know that p. Higg<strong>in</strong>botham (1994a), 31