Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
Perception verb complements in Akatek, a Mayan language
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1. INTRODUCTION 51<br />
term<strong>in</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> Akmajian (1977), I refer to nite PVCs as that-PVCs<br />
(7) and to naked <strong>in</strong> nitive PVCs as NI-PVCs (8).<br />
(7) John saw [that [Jim brought a bottle of w<strong>in</strong>e]].<br />
(8) John saw [him br<strong>in</strong>g a bottle of w<strong>in</strong>e].<br />
That-PVCs consist of a nite clause that is optionally marked by the<br />
complementizer that. NI-PVCs basically consist of an accusatively<br />
marked logical subject followed by the <strong>verb</strong> <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong> nitive form and<br />
an accusative direct object.<br />
To-<strong>in</strong> nitives, that are embedded by a PV, are <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
referred to as to-PVCs (9).<br />
(9) I felt [him to possess the necessary quali cations].<br />
Bol<strong>in</strong>ger (1974)<br />
To-PVCs basically consist of an accusative logical subject followed by<br />
the <strong>in</strong> nitive marker to, the <strong>verb</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong> nitive form and - if transitive<br />
- an accusative object. As illustrated <strong>in</strong> (10), to-PVCs are restricted.<br />
Their predicate must either conta<strong>in</strong> a form of be as <strong>in</strong> (11), or it must<br />
be possible to paraphrase the predicate with a form of be as shown <strong>in</strong><br />
(12).<br />
(10) *I saw him to cross the street. Vendler (1968), 66<br />
(11) Isaw them to be obnoxious. Bol<strong>in</strong>ger (1974), 66<br />
(12) The tasters felt it to surpass all the others. (= to be better)<br />
Bol<strong>in</strong>ger (1974), 72<br />
The most diverse group of PVCs are the <strong>in</strong>g-clauses. I dist<strong>in</strong>guish three<br />
types of <strong>in</strong>g-clauses. The two PVCtypes listed <strong>in</strong> Table 1: present participles<br />
and <strong>in</strong>g-of nom<strong>in</strong>alizations. The third type is a nom<strong>in</strong>alization<br />
that is not a PVC type but is added to the list of complementtypes for<br />
contrastive purposes regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>g-of nom<strong>in</strong>alization. The present<br />
participle is traditionally referred to as ACC-<strong>in</strong>g (13-a). The additional<br />
non-PVC nom<strong>in</strong>alization is the POSS-<strong>in</strong>g construction (13-b).<br />
The nom<strong>in</strong>alized PVC is called the <strong>in</strong>g-of (13-c) type.<br />
(13) a. John heard [him s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g the Marseillaise].<br />
b. John remembered [his s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g the Marseillaise].<br />
c. John heard [his s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g of the Marseillaise].<br />
The ACC-<strong>in</strong>g type <strong>in</strong> (13-a) is characterized by a logical subject <strong>in</strong> the<br />
accusative while both POSS-<strong>in</strong>g (13-b) and <strong>in</strong>g-of (13-c) <strong>complements</strong>