conference schedule and program with abstracts - Horticulture ...
conference schedule and program with abstracts - Horticulture ...
conference schedule and program with abstracts - Horticulture ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P-58<br />
Characterization of grape cultivars through Expressed Sequence Tag Polymorphism<br />
(ESTP)<br />
M.F. Moura* 1 , H.E. Sawazaki 1 , A.R. Verdi 2 , C.L. Messias 3<br />
1 Instituto Agronômico - IAC. Av. Barão de Itapura, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil; 2 Instituto de<br />
Economia Agrícola - IEA, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 3 College of Agriculture Engineering,<br />
Feagri, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil<br />
*Corresponding author: mouram@iac.sp.gov.br<br />
The Brazilian cultivars ‘Maximo IAC 138’ (a hybrid of ‘Shiraz’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Seibel’ developed by Dr.<br />
Santos Neto in the Instituto Agronômico de Campinas/IAC, SP, in 1946), ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong><br />
‘Madalena’ were characterized through Expressed Sequence Tag Polymorphism (ESTP) <strong>and</strong><br />
restriction sites. The foliar DNA was extracted using CTAB. The PCR was done using first <strong>with</strong><br />
eleven <strong>and</strong> then thirteen primers to find EST-SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphism) in the<br />
grapevine genome. The amplicon sequencing was done after EXO-SAP purification, using the<br />
Big Dye v. 3.0/ ABI PRISM 377 from Applied Biosystems, <strong>with</strong> three replicates. The sequences<br />
analyzed <strong>with</strong> Sequencher 3.1 (Gene Codes Corporation) were compared using the Bioedit<br />
v.7.05 <strong>and</strong> analyzed in silico for specific restriction sites (http://www.restrictionmapper.org/). It<br />
was observed that one primer named 28 differentiated ‘Rainha’ from ‘Máximo’ in three regions,<br />
while another primer, 126, differentiated ‘Madalena’ from ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Maximo’ in two<br />
regions <strong>and</strong> ‘Maximo’ from ‘Madalena’ in a different site. The primer 136 differentiated<br />
‘Madalena’ from cultivars ‘Maximo’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Rainha’. The other primers seem not to have amplified<br />
sequences <strong>with</strong> specific restriction site differences among cultivars. Through analysis “in silico”<br />
we observed that <strong>with</strong> primer 136, the SduI enzyme differentiated ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Maximo’ from<br />
‘Madalena’ whereas <strong>with</strong> primer 28, the IMx enzyme differentiated ‘Maximo’ from ‘Rainha’.<br />
The analyses carried out using the studied primers allowed the detection of sequences <strong>with</strong><br />
specific restriction sites <strong>and</strong> consequently, the differentiation of’ Maximo’, ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong><br />
‘Madalena’ cultivars.<br />
137