14.02.2014 Views

conference schedule and program with abstracts - Horticulture ...

conference schedule and program with abstracts - Horticulture ...

conference schedule and program with abstracts - Horticulture ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P-58<br />

Characterization of grape cultivars through Expressed Sequence Tag Polymorphism<br />

(ESTP)<br />

M.F. Moura* 1 , H.E. Sawazaki 1 , A.R. Verdi 2 , C.L. Messias 3<br />

1 Instituto Agronômico - IAC. Av. Barão de Itapura, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil; 2 Instituto de<br />

Economia Agrícola - IEA, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; 3 College of Agriculture Engineering,<br />

Feagri, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil<br />

*Corresponding author: mouram@iac.sp.gov.br<br />

The Brazilian cultivars ‘Maximo IAC 138’ (a hybrid of ‘Shiraz’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Seibel’ developed by Dr.<br />

Santos Neto in the Instituto Agronômico de Campinas/IAC, SP, in 1946), ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong><br />

‘Madalena’ were characterized through Expressed Sequence Tag Polymorphism (ESTP) <strong>and</strong><br />

restriction sites. The foliar DNA was extracted using CTAB. The PCR was done using first <strong>with</strong><br />

eleven <strong>and</strong> then thirteen primers to find EST-SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphism) in the<br />

grapevine genome. The amplicon sequencing was done after EXO-SAP purification, using the<br />

Big Dye v. 3.0/ ABI PRISM 377 from Applied Biosystems, <strong>with</strong> three replicates. The sequences<br />

analyzed <strong>with</strong> Sequencher 3.1 (Gene Codes Corporation) were compared using the Bioedit<br />

v.7.05 <strong>and</strong> analyzed in silico for specific restriction sites (http://www.restrictionmapper.org/). It<br />

was observed that one primer named 28 differentiated ‘Rainha’ from ‘Máximo’ in three regions,<br />

while another primer, 126, differentiated ‘Madalena’ from ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Maximo’ in two<br />

regions <strong>and</strong> ‘Maximo’ from ‘Madalena’ in a different site. The primer 136 differentiated<br />

‘Madalena’ from cultivars ‘Maximo’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Rainha’. The other primers seem not to have amplified<br />

sequences <strong>with</strong> specific restriction site differences among cultivars. Through analysis “in silico”<br />

we observed that <strong>with</strong> primer 136, the SduI enzyme differentiated ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Maximo’ from<br />

‘Madalena’ whereas <strong>with</strong> primer 28, the IMx enzyme differentiated ‘Maximo’ from ‘Rainha’.<br />

The analyses carried out using the studied primers allowed the detection of sequences <strong>with</strong><br />

specific restriction sites <strong>and</strong> consequently, the differentiation of’ Maximo’, ‘Rainha’ <strong>and</strong><br />

‘Madalena’ cultivars.<br />

137


Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!