23.02.2014 Views

Shape

Shape

Shape

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

175 Back to Basics—Elements and Embedding<br />

and lines are coincident with planes<br />

But this definition may be too narrow. Lines that extend past the boundaries of<br />

planes<br />

aren’t entirely coincident with them, even though they contain lines that are. Only<br />

how about cases like this<br />

where a line isn’t coincident with a plane but can be divided into segments, so that<br />

each segment is coincident with the plane? (I can also say this for any basic element<br />

in terms of embedding. If I stick with lines, it goes like this: every line embedded<br />

in the line has a line embedded in it that’s coincident with the plane.) Moreover, it<br />

would be useful for every basic element to be coincident with itself, and for the first<br />

term in a series of basic elements, each term coincident with the next, to be coincident<br />

with the last term. Once transitivity—that’s the third amendment—is in place,<br />

points are also coincident with planes in various ways, either inside, on an edge, or at<br />

a corner<br />

And with the final two amendments, I get a partial order. What’s more, coincidence<br />

lets me define touching in another way. Two basic elements touch if there’s a single<br />

basic element coincident with both. There’s more here than in my initial definition,<br />

since basic elements aren’t distinguished by kind—lines and planes can touch. This<br />

line touches three squares, each in a different way

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!