23.02.2014 Views

Shape

Shape

Shape

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212 II Seeing How It Works<br />

topology and connected in the other. Among other things, the topology of the point<br />

set confuses the boundary of the shape that’s not part of it—a shape in the algebra<br />

U i 1 j —and the topological boundary of the shape that is. Points are too small to distinguish<br />

between boundaries as parts and limits. To get around this, point sets are ‘‘regular’’<br />

when they’re shapes, and Boolean operations are ‘‘regularized.’’ This seems an<br />

artificial way to handle lines, planes, and solids. Of course, shapes made up of points<br />

are point sets with topologies in which parts are disconnected. This and my gloss on<br />

individuals reinforce what I’ve already said. The switch from identity to embedding<br />

may seem modest—it’s going from zero to one—but it has telling consequences for<br />

shapes and how rules work.<br />

Euclidean Embeddings<br />

The Euclidean transformations augment the Boolean operations in the algebras of<br />

shapes U ij with additional operators. They’re defined for basic elements and extend<br />

easily to shapes. Any transformation of the empty shape is the empty shape. And<br />

a transformation of a nonempty shape contains the transformation of each of the<br />

basic elements in the shape. This relies on the underlying recursion implicit in tables<br />

3 and 7 in which boundaries of basic elements are transformed until new points are<br />

defined.<br />

The universe of all shapes, no matter what kind of basic elements are involved,<br />

can be described as a set containing certain specific shapes, and other shapes formed<br />

using the sum operation and the transformations. For points and lines, the universe is<br />

defined with the empty shape and a shape that contains a single point or a single line.<br />

Points are geometrically similar, and so are lines. But this relationship doesn’t carry<br />

over to planes and solids. As a result, more shapes are needed at the start. All shapes<br />

with a single triangle or a single tetrahedron do the trick, because triangles and tetrahedrons<br />

make the other planes and solids. For a point in zero dimensions, the identity is<br />

the only transformation. So there are exactly two shapes—the empty shape and the<br />

point itself. In all other cases, there are indefinitely many distinct shapes that come<br />

with any number of basic elements. Every nonempty shape is geometrically similar to<br />

indefinitely many other shapes. There’s plenty of opportunity to move shapes around<br />

and to increase or decrease their size without changing the relationships between their<br />

basic elements—for example, the angles defined by lines.<br />

The algebras of shapes U ij also have a Euclidean classification that refines the<br />

Boolean classification I’ve given. Together these classifications form an interlocking<br />

taxonomy. The algebras U ii on the diagonal provide the main Euclidean division

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!