20.03.2014 Views

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REVIEW ARTICLE 341<br />

414, a pig year. Using <strong>the</strong> 10-year cycle [rrn] toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> era<br />

as 'year 1' [ekasak] it will be thus: pig year, first <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade,<br />

poratf era 1. In <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Thai it would be<br />

expressed as pora'! era 1, a kap kai year. When <strong>the</strong> porar} era bad<br />

reached 17 years <strong>the</strong> 10-year cycle and <strong>the</strong> era would have completed<br />

one full turn plus a remainder <strong>of</strong> 7. <strong>The</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> 7 is<br />

equal to sapra <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Thai or kat .<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Thai,<br />

and corresponds to year <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bare {thau~ or mau) as well. Thus<br />

it can be concluded that maha sakar'aja 17, kat cai year is really a<br />

kat mau year, that is, hare year, 7th <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade, [Buddhist] era<br />

430". 40<br />

If <strong>the</strong> foregoing appears very tortuous to uninitiated readers, let<br />

me hasten to assure <strong>the</strong>m that it is equally hard going for those in <strong>the</strong><br />

habit <strong>of</strong> working with Thai dating systems. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, and<br />

for reasons which I shall set forth below, not only is kat cai incorrect for<br />

<strong>the</strong> year in question, whe<strong>the</strong>r considered as pre-Buddhist poiaf) era or<br />

equivalent to B.E. 430, but kat mau as well is both incorrect for <strong>the</strong> year<br />

in question and, in addition, is an impossible combination. <strong>The</strong> true<br />

cyclical combination for pre-Buddhist poraf} 17, had such a system been<br />

in use at <strong>the</strong> time, would have been rahvay sana and <strong>the</strong> true cyclical date<br />

<strong>of</strong> B.E. 430 was mo'h mau, which was indeed a bare (mau) year, as Manit<br />

calculated, but kat mau is impossible, since in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system works<br />

one <strong>of</strong> those terms, no matter what numerical year count is used, will<br />

always accompany odd numbers and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r even.<br />

Although most readers probably have some familiarity with <strong>the</strong>se<br />

cycles, an understanding <strong>of</strong> which is essential to <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

Manit's analysis, <strong>the</strong> descripitons I h,ave seen <strong>of</strong>ten leave important<br />

points in obscurity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> so-called nor<strong>the</strong>rn .cycle consists <strong>of</strong> two series, one <strong>of</strong> 10 and<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> 12 terms, such as, for ex;ample, <strong>the</strong> numbers 1-10 and <strong>the</strong><br />

letters A-L, combined in <strong>the</strong> manner t~A, 2-B and so forth up to 10-J,<br />

after which <strong>the</strong> first series starts again, 1-K, 2-L, 3-A, etc. <strong>The</strong> result<br />

40) Manit, p. 16.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!