20.03.2014 Views

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

348 REVIEW AR'f!CLE<br />

Also fictitious is Manit's du£iya .Sakaraja, beginning at a date<br />

corresponding to A.D. 17. It is only made necessary by <strong>the</strong> artificial<br />

sequence into which he has fitted <strong>the</strong> eras, although it does coincide with<br />

a local tradition.s7<br />

Of course, in altering <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eras, Manit bad to find<br />

explanations for <strong>the</strong> very explicit statements <strong>of</strong> TS concerning <strong>the</strong><br />

Buddhist era and such well known figures as Ajatasatru and Maha<br />

Kassapa. His explanations are found in note 45, pp. 38-39, note 55,<br />

pp. 43-45, and note 170, pp. 70-71.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se notes he declares that Ajatasatru and Maba<br />

Kassapa <strong>of</strong> TS are not <strong>the</strong> persons <strong>of</strong> those names known from Buddhist<br />

)ore, but ra<strong>the</strong>r local figures from nor<strong>the</strong>rn Thailand. He identifies<br />

Ajatasatru with King Ajutaraja, ignoring <strong>the</strong> logic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> narrative that<br />

Kassapa first cut <strong>the</strong> era with Ajatasatru, <strong>the</strong>n took relics to Yonaka<br />

where he met Ajutaraja. Maha Kassapa himself, in note 55, has become<br />

<strong>the</strong> Kassapa-Matanga who introduced Buddhism into China about 65<br />

A.D.<br />

As for <strong>the</strong> many explicit remarks about dates in "<strong>the</strong> Buddhist era",<br />

or so many years "after <strong>the</strong> Buddha had entered nir'vana", Manit has<br />

provided a long explanation in note 170, pp. 70-71, in order to circumvent<br />

<strong>the</strong> difficulties.<br />

He starts by saying that since <strong>the</strong> "Buddhist era" <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text does<br />

not fit <strong>the</strong> known facts <strong>of</strong> B. E., it must be something else, even though<br />

<strong>the</strong> reason it does not fit is because <strong>of</strong> his own arbitrary arrangement.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n he reasons that:<br />

- bra~ya b"tmdhanati and <strong>the</strong> Buddha <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text died in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

year.<br />

- <strong>The</strong> Buddhist religion <strong>the</strong>n spread from "China down to <strong>the</strong> area<br />

<strong>of</strong> yonaka", which is his interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statement in<br />

paragraph 140 that <strong>the</strong> Buddhist religion "was only flourishing<br />

from mo'ah rajagth down to mo'an yuan jiin saen".<br />

- <strong>The</strong> religion <strong>of</strong> China at that time was Taoism.<br />

- bra~y'a bandhanati must have been a strong supporter <strong>of</strong> Taoism<br />

and considered as a sort <strong>of</strong> angel (brahmadeva) <strong>of</strong> Taoism.<br />

57) See below concerning <strong>the</strong> era <strong>of</strong> bandhumatti.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!