20.03.2014 Views

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

240 REVIEW ARTICLES<br />

( 1292-1309) and that <strong>of</strong> his successer, Jayanagara ( 1309-28) were full <strong>of</strong><br />

disturbances, and Java did not interfere in <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> Sri Vijaya.<br />

However, embassies to China were sent in 1297, 1298, 1300 and 1308<br />

A.D.<br />

1293 A.D. <strong>The</strong> Javanese forces sent to occupy Malayu (Central<br />

Sumatra) returned home. <strong>The</strong>y took back with <strong>the</strong>m two princesses,<br />

Dara Jingga and Dara Petak <strong>the</strong> younger <strong>of</strong> whom is said to have married<br />

<strong>the</strong> new king Krtarasa, and was known as Indresvari; while <strong>the</strong> elder,<br />

Dara Jingga, is said to have become <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> a future king <strong>of</strong><br />

Malayu.<br />

1295 A.D. Kublai Khan sent a messenger to <strong>the</strong> king <strong>of</strong> Sien to say<br />

that "you should keep to <strong>the</strong> word you have given and stop killing <strong>the</strong><br />

people <strong>of</strong> Malaiur". Sien should mean Sukhothai, and <strong>the</strong> king was Ram<br />

Kamhaeng. Malaiur was Nakorn and not Malayu in Sumatra (see under<br />

Marco Polo 1292 (a) above). It bears repeating that <strong>the</strong> Thai were<br />

landlubbers and <strong>the</strong>re is no record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir interfering in <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong><br />

Sumatra.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re seems to be a great deal <strong>of</strong> confusion over <strong>the</strong> Chinese<br />

toponyms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> states in <strong>the</strong> Central Plain <strong>of</strong> <strong>Siam</strong>, so I will confound<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole situation just a wee bit fur<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong>re were two states roughly<br />

divided by <strong>the</strong> Menam Chao Phya (river). <strong>The</strong> Chinese called <strong>the</strong> eastern<br />

state Lokok (Marco Polo's Locac). This was Lopburi or Lawo-kok if I<br />

may call it that because Lawo was <strong>the</strong> old name <strong>of</strong> Lopburi. When <strong>the</strong><br />

capital moved to Ayodhiaj Ayudhia <strong>the</strong> name Lokok was still used.<br />

<strong>The</strong> state on <strong>the</strong> western side was called Siemkok (<strong>Siam</strong>-kok). Early<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Christian Era, Ptolemy called this place Samarade (an inland town),<br />

which is tbe same as Samrattha, a name I understand <strong>the</strong> Indians still use<br />

to call <strong>Siam</strong>. It would seem that when <strong>the</strong> Thai came from <strong>the</strong> north<br />

into <strong>the</strong> Central Plain, <strong>the</strong>y took over a <strong>Siam</strong> that had been occupied by<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r races such as <strong>the</strong> Mons, and possibly some o<strong>the</strong>r races before <strong>the</strong><br />

Mons. <strong>The</strong> main locations <strong>of</strong> Sien were Nakorn or Lakorn Cbaisri (present<br />

Nakorn Patbom) which <strong>the</strong> Chinese called Lang-ya-shu; Supanburi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!