20.03.2014 Views

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REVJEW ARTICLES 305<br />

1. Perhaps <strong>the</strong>re was "ano<strong>the</strong>r Palembang" south <strong>of</strong> th~e Musi<br />

river. It bears repeating that, according to Soekmono's geomorphological<br />

paper, Palembang in <strong>the</strong> 7th century was on <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> a promontory<br />

and <strong>the</strong> land below that was stilL under water. In any case, from what<br />

I have seen, if <strong>the</strong>re had been ano<strong>the</strong>r Palembang it could be found more<br />

easily from air photographs than conjecturing about it.<br />

2. In case ano<strong>the</strong>r Palembang cannot be found, Wolters seems to<br />

veer from straight history to a research on <strong>the</strong> changing coastline <strong>of</strong><br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Sumatra. Four Chinese itinararies are mentioned <strong>of</strong> which two<br />

are discussed, namely,<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

7th century 1-Ching,<br />

8th century Embassy from Pyu in upland Burma,<br />

11th century Embassy from South India, and<br />

15th century Ma Huan.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 7th and 15th century itineraries give no trouble. <strong>The</strong> evidence<br />

is first hand by writers who visited <strong>the</strong> locations. But <strong>the</strong> 8th and lltb<br />

century itineraries are something else. <strong>The</strong> information was supplied to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Chinese by foreign embassies, probably through interpreters. It is<br />

difficult to understand why embassies goJng to China from Burma and<br />

South India should use <strong>the</strong> Sunda and not <strong>the</strong> Malacca Straits. Indeed<br />

if Pyu was really in upper Burma one would have expected <strong>the</strong> journey<br />

to have been made by land and not by sea at all. But this is immaterial.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main point is that if <strong>the</strong> two embassies went through <strong>the</strong> Malacca<br />

Straits, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> Chinese toponyms that Wolters located in South Sumatra<br />

could all be wrong. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, if <strong>the</strong> trips were really through<br />

<strong>the</strong> Sunda Straits, landmarks in <strong>the</strong> Peninsula and North Sumatra would<br />

-have been sighted and probably mentioned. So only some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

toponyms might have been mislocated. <strong>The</strong> whole exercise smacks <strong>of</strong><br />

playing <strong>the</strong> Chinese word-game to me~ And iri any case, <strong>the</strong> muddy<br />

coasts <strong>of</strong> South Sumatra is hardly a worthwhile research subject for a<br />

historian <strong>of</strong> Wolters' calibre.<br />

3. Again, if ano<strong>the</strong>r Palembang cannot be found, Wolters switches<br />

fr9rn history to "<strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> early Malay civilization," If <strong>the</strong> people

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!