20.03.2014 Views

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 Benjamin A. Batson<br />

classes."22I<br />

None<strong>the</strong>less Barrett gave enthusiastic support to <strong>the</strong><br />

program <strong>of</strong> reforms initiated by Chulalongkorn, and when <strong>the</strong> king's<br />

1897 European tour was announced be invited Chulalongkorn to visit <strong>the</strong><br />

United States as well. Barrett had not cleared this proposal with Washington,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> State sent a strong reprimand when it<br />

discovered that <strong>the</strong> minister had taken it upon himself to invite a head<br />

<strong>of</strong> state for an <strong>of</strong>ficial visit.222<br />

It was also while Barrett was American Minister that Great Britain<br />

and France signed a convention guaranteeing <strong>the</strong> territorial integrity <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Siam</strong> (but not <strong>the</strong> periphery), in order to provide a<br />

buffer state between <strong>the</strong> Asian empires <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two European powers.<br />

Barrett thought <strong>the</strong> agreement good for <strong>Siam</strong>, and, indirectly, for <strong>the</strong><br />

United States. Barrett generally had good relations with <strong>the</strong> o~er<br />

treaty power representatives, and in contrast to <strong>the</strong> policy <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong><br />

his predecessors, he stressed <strong>the</strong>ir "necessity <strong>of</strong> acting in harmony."l 23<br />

Shortly after his arrival in Bangkok, Barrett bad reported:224<br />

221) <strong>Siam</strong> Despatches, January 16, 1895. <strong>The</strong> following year, in a confidential<br />

despatch, Barrett was even more pessimistic. Noting that, ''Reforms are<br />

constantly announced but not enforced," he said that many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Thai elite,<br />

including some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> royal family, did not expect <strong>the</strong> government to survive,<br />

and were making investments abroad. In particular, "I am informed on<br />

excellent authority that <strong>the</strong> women in <strong>the</strong> palace (<strong>the</strong> best political <strong>the</strong>rmometers)<br />

are secretly negotiating such arrangements as will make <strong>the</strong>m and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

property safe, if <strong>the</strong> King dies or o<strong>the</strong>r complications develop." (<strong>Siam</strong><br />

Despatches, ..\ugust 19, 1896.)<br />

222) Barrett claimed that he had only issued <strong>the</strong> invitation after first ascertaining<br />

that it would be declined (<strong>Siam</strong> Despatches June I, 1897).<br />

In one report Barrett said <strong>of</strong> King Chulalongko:rn : ''He is a man who<br />

has <strong>the</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> foreigners and natives alike. He is easily <strong>the</strong> ablest<br />

statesman <strong>of</strong> <strong>Siam</strong>, and well fitted to be its ruler." (Consulat Reports, vol. 57,<br />

no. 212 (May 1898), p. 60.)<br />

223) <strong>Siam</strong> Despatches, January 30, 1896; February 18, 1896; March 2, 1896; and<br />

August I 0, 1896. <strong>The</strong> quotation is from this last despatch, which was occa~<br />

sioned by Barrett's becoming doyen <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> diplomatic corps in Bangkok.<br />

224) <strong>Siam</strong> Despatches, June 30, 1894. In ano<strong>the</strong>r despatch, Barrett, "with no<br />

intention <strong>of</strong> reflecting in any way on a predecessor," criticized Eaton's han~<br />

dling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cheek case, and said that in Eaton's time "it was commonly stated<br />

in Bangkok that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Siam</strong>ese Foreign Office knew much more about <strong>the</strong> affairs<br />

<strong>of</strong> this Legation and Consulate General than did <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> State at<br />

Washington." (October 22, 1895).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!