20.03.2014 Views

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

The Journal of the Siam Society Vol. LXIV, Part 1-2, 1976 - Khamkoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

248 REVIEW ARTICLES<br />

at Malacca and Parameswara, <strong>the</strong> local chief, took <strong>the</strong> opportunity to<br />

ask for protection from <strong>the</strong> Emperor by saying that be "was aware <strong>of</strong><br />

his duty and desired that his country should be considered a district <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> empire, in return for which he would <strong>of</strong>fer annual tribute" (Paul<br />

Wheatley, <strong>The</strong> Golden Khersonese, page 308). This <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> protection<br />

will be developed in <strong>the</strong> next section. Incidentally this section and<br />

<strong>the</strong> one following are printed almost as first drafted and interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evidence differs somewhat from that in section 20 (pp. 308-16).<br />

24. PROFESSOR WOLTERS' SECOND BOOK<br />

Historians <strong>of</strong> Malaya never seem to tire <strong>of</strong> writing about <strong>the</strong><br />

founders <strong>of</strong> Singapore and Malaya. <strong>The</strong>y do it ad nausea tum. <strong>The</strong> reason<br />

<strong>of</strong> course is that some wit has stated that Malaya bas no history before<br />

<strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> Malacca. This may be true for all I know if we take<br />

Malaya to be limited by <strong>the</strong> present political boundaries, but if we<br />

broaden <strong>the</strong> scope to cover <strong>the</strong> Peninsula, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> statement is definitely<br />

false. Unfortunately historians <strong>of</strong> Malaya have gratuitously given away<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir evidence to Java and Sumatra, and <strong>of</strong> course jig-saw pieces will<br />

simply not fit if <strong>the</strong> game is played on <strong>the</strong> wrong table. So we have<br />

Dutch wits writing about a Sumatran period in Javanese history, and<br />

a Javanese period in Sumatran history, when <strong>the</strong>y should write about<br />

a Malayan period in South Sumatran history, and a Malayan period in<br />

Central Javanese history. Such is <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> Sri Vijaya. This started<br />

with I-Ching in <strong>the</strong> 7th century and ended six centuries later with<br />

Chandrabanu in <strong>the</strong> 13th. A century or even two might be added to<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r end, but not convincingly because <strong>the</strong> Sri Vijaya story is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Malacca Straits, and this control started with !-Ching's<br />

evidence when be said that "Mo-lo-yu has now become San-fo-tsi," and<br />

ended with Chandrabanu when <strong>the</strong> two parts, Sumatra and <strong>the</strong> Peninsula,<br />

became separated.<br />

Wolters' book d!'lals with <strong>the</strong> period just before and just after <strong>the</strong><br />

end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 14th century. It is about <strong>the</strong> founder (not founders) <strong>of</strong> both<br />

Sin~apore ang M&l~cc~:~.. Bis CMe is oase

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!