2009 Kitsap County Budget Book - Kitsap County Government

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Performance Measures:
(Note: The letter in the first column refers to its related Desired Program Outcome)
2009
Effectiveness
Forecast
A) Conclude area planning efforts and Site Specific Amendments; respond to both community completion
needs and unforeseen circumstances.
Oct 09
B) Conclude code review in 3-4 months per Title, resulting in 3-4 reviews/year, increasing
ongoing
overall DCD performance.
C) Develop rural commercial/industrial sites, partnering with local orgs/agencies, and
TBD, est
developing appropriate rural code.
2010
D) Legacy lot regulation will prevent urban level densities and associated challenges. mid-2009
E) Rural Wooded Incentive Program development will allow for clustered development for
TBD,
certain rural areas.
est mid-2009
F) Increased and necessary backlog elimination will reduce files ‘on the books;’ increased
efficiency in processing will allow for compliant permitting and right-sizing of permit workload;
-
managing Hearings Examiner efforts according to procedures manual will result in proficiency.
2009
Efficiency
Forecast
A) Utilizing demonstrated experience in planning areas (eg, a planner who has experience and completion
knowledge in an area will continue to plan for that area)
Oct 09
B) Establish routine for code development, beginning with current effort. ongoing
C) Will engage all partners in one holistic and collaborative environment, rather than
TBD, est
segregating areas, stakeholders and efforts.
2010
D) Legacy Lot code development will utilize student internship and likely be modeled after
mid-2009
similar legislation elsewhere.
E) Rural Wooded Incentive Program development may utilize an internship, use existing and
TBD,
previous efforts as a baseline, attempting consensus building for a GMA -compliant and Countyacceptable
program.
est mid-2009
F) Processing improvement will result in new DCD and countywide culture; database will be rid
-
of ‘hung’ permits
2009
Workload
Forecast
A) 1 planner for GHA/Kingston planning; 1 planner for Silverdale; all planners for Site Specific
Amendments. (1.5 FTE)
completion
Oct 09
B) 1 planner dedicated to effort, with Land Use support. (0.8 FTE) Ongoing
C) 1 planner dedicated to effort, with support from code development planner (0.6 FTE) TBD, est
2010
D) 1 planner dedicated to effort. (0.2 FTE) mid-2009
E) 1 planner dedicated to effort. (0.2 FTE) TBD,
est mid-2009
F) 4 planners (to mid-yr); 3 planners (mid-to-end of yr) ongoing
183