30.08.2014 Views

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I Box. 4.9 Icroaigenviironmental. concerns early in planning: some recent lessonts<br />

'from SriLnk<br />

Over the -past decade, developing. countries,.and the researthes and environmnental experts, the study deter.<br />

-World Bank itseZ, have begun to require comprehenisive mined long-term development options for the 5ector,<br />

envirnmental assessments (MAs) ~as. a routine compo-.. incorprating. envirnmental concerns. Alternative<br />

nent of .prmject development. This reuirement has. strategies were compared, taking into account system<br />

foncd a bteinertoofevomntal dcerns cost, biodJiversity, health-effects, .system-reliability, and,<br />

into poetdesignk, with appropriate attention to mitiga- greenhouse. gas emissions. The technique of multition<br />

options. But-a project4evel EA is best at dealing: attribute -decision atnalYsis, whichleritsaayi of<br />

with proj1ect-level mitigationjissues Without considera-: tradeoffs between -objectives~, is-particularly. useful in<br />

dion of environmental issues at- the long-term planning such assessments when economic valuationi of environstage,<br />

itis doubtful that project-level. EAs can steer the; mnental externalities proves difficult<br />

deveopmnt f a ectr aongenvioronmentally sustain- Fyom, the analysis, the study identified the set of<br />

able paths,Freaml,beas<br />

pactsof hdropantsare<br />

the environmental im-<br />

-quite diffeent from those of -<br />

"nndominated" options that was better than the others<br />

in at least oeattribute (such as cost, emissions reliabil-<br />

* Themal gn&rnin. th quetioni of ho~w air pollution ity) but no wojrse int the other attributest This set repreimpacts<br />

are tradedcf ih nnaio-eae impacts sents thi. options that decsionmakers need to consider<br />

-fall well outside the domain of project EAs. Although and induded, for example, notonly alternative fuel corn-<br />

-_the.incremental effect of a single plant-can be rational-.<br />

fred uiteeasil, wht ma ter ste oerl impact of<br />

binations in power plants but also supply-side efficiency<br />

improvements int the transmission -and distribution systhe<br />

sequence bfd plants ini a power sector investment' tern and demand-sde management options, such as the<br />

program.<br />

~~~~~~~~~~~iniroduction-of<br />

compact fluorescent lighting.<br />

A recent World Bank study of thie Sri Lankan po-wer. Following this,study, such new methods of evaluasector<br />

examnehd ways of bringing consideration of envi- tion have begun-to be institutionalized in the Sri Lankan<br />

wonmental issues into the early stages of poe etri- utilitys planning cycle. In 1993, for the first time, the*<br />

vestmentplanning and of dealing with the basic issues of study for planning expansion of generating capacity incompaning<br />

very different kinds of.environnmental ho- duded aVsstematic eamination ofdemand-side-manpacts<br />

associated wihdfeet technlogies. Working agement and privatization options, as well as an envi-<br />

7with the Sri Larnkan generationt utility and a group of .ronmental overview of conventional supply options.<br />

ment of thte econom3ic and fmandial-risics is often pacts are identified antd assessed. Experience with<br />

criticaL Because of the inherentt uncertainity in fore- evrn ntlassessments demonstrates that infracas-ts<br />

of future conditions,: projects should be se- structure projects are least likely to impose stress on<br />

lected on the basis of careful sensitivity analysis. the environument if such assessments occur early<br />

Planning forecasts -in the World Bank's appraisal of; and influence the design of individual projects-not<br />

infrstrutureprojects have sometimes overesti- just the selection of a particular project from a set of<br />

mated dem-and (Chapter 1). High demand forecasts alternatives. In Sri Lanka a recent power planning<br />

lead to larger facilities, resulting in the selection of study involved not only selecting from among vanmore<br />

capital-intensive investment options. Tech-. ous fossil fuel and other generating options, but also<br />

niques that facilitate risk analysis in complex infra- paying attention to the need for energy conservastructur<br />

projects, such as applying multicriteria tion (Box 4.9).<br />

methods or drawing on financial options theory, are As the scale of hinfastructur projects grows,<br />

currnty. being developed,<br />

environmental consequences become increasingly<br />

E,wiromnental<br />

~~~~~ ,~~.significant<br />

A study of several large World Bankfunded<br />

projects in Brazi (representin total ap-<br />

ASSESSING ENVIONMENTA IMPACt. Envirorkment- proved Bank financing of $1.15 billion) examined<br />

tal regulation and promotion of the efficient use of environmental consequences and emphasized that<br />

ifatructure help reduce adverse consequences environmental assessments should take a. broad<br />

from existing infrastructur, issues ththv en perspective capable of recognizing regional effects<br />

explored in detail by World Development Report 1992. and induced economic impacts, as well as the po-<br />

More options'are* available with new projects, al- tential consequences of broad economic conditi-ons<br />

though investment decisions can be consistent with. for the project Moreover, even though large investenvironmental<br />

objectives only if environmnental im- ment programs mybe broken down into subcom-.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!