30.08.2014 Views

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

nancing to ensure that communities are willing to<br />

pay for the quality of road service provided-if all Igare 4. oitries wvith decetaid<br />

costs were borne by higher government levels, local wad mdaitenance -nave btter ro 6ads,<br />

reidents would prefer paved roads. A review of<br />

forty-two developing countries found that, where .<br />

-road maintenance was decentralized, bacldogs were<br />

P--,eicentage_oF rodslower<br />

and the condition of roads was better (al- - -<br />

thiough thie e-ffect of financing dcleontraliztion was L- ~ 5 012 533<br />

not included) (Figure 4.1). The decentralied cases ,<br />

also had higher proportions of paved roadway. But<br />

decentralization was also associated with high-er unit Tnpvdros<br />

costs of maintenance (partially reflecting the higher<br />

share of paved woads) and with wider differences in<br />

quality across regions (reflecting interregional differences<br />

in institutional or human capacity).<br />

DEca,rrRAuzxnoN IN wATER AND SANITAloN. An<br />

analysis of World Bank-funded projects demonstrates<br />

thiat a division of responsibfiiies, provided<br />

that there~ is suitable coordination, leads to better<br />

performance and miaintenance in the water~ and<br />

sanitation sectors than would be the case in more<br />

Paived road<br />

Cntaize eU<br />

flenraid<br />

centralized frameworks. Data for a group of devel- --<br />

oping countries reveal that per capita water produc- 5rWdd Idaa£42eelpgom2s<br />

tion costs are four times higher in centralzed 'than -<br />

in fully decentralized systems and are lowest when<br />

decentraliztion is combined with centralied coordinationt<br />

Mast water sector studies recommend a gional public utilities often take over local functions<br />

three-tiered organ'ization, with a national agency re- on contract from those municipalities that lack the<br />

sponsible for finance, long-term planning, standard -necessary scale of operation to be economic..<br />

setting, and technical assistance. Under the national Decentralization is. not inherently good or badagency,<br />

regional utilities function as operators, mon- As with all arrangemnents, its success depends on<br />

itoring compliance with national standards and reg- the incenitives it creates, the capabilities it can draw<br />

ulatiorns, supervising local systems, and training on, and the costs it imposes.-To improve incentives,<br />

local managers and technical staff. The third tier public accountability is essential and can be enconsists<br />

of local agencies that manage the local sy- hanced by local choice of leaders, local control of fi-.<br />

tern, collect fees, monitor use and maintenance, and nances, and other forms of local responsibility. Elecplan<br />

local budgets. An alternative decentralized tions are one mechanism for involving citizens in<br />

arrang ement found* in France and Germany (and choices-electoral reformn in Colombia and Veneemerging<br />

in Brazil and Poland) moves mnanagement zuela has produced a resurgence in 1hcal leadership.<br />

of each activity to the lowest appropriate level. For Newly elected mayors have been able to mobilize<br />

example, water resource mnanagement-including private sector financing for investment prograrns_ In<br />

regulation, emission standard setting, and invest-. order to be held accountable, local leaders must<br />

merit decisi'ons-is at the water basin (rather than have controL This includes control over revenues,<br />

the national) level, while the provision of services is which in turn requires ade quate local finance laws<br />

left to municipalities.<br />

(covering budgeting financial reporting, taxation,<br />

Of course, technical considerations may dictate contracting, and dispute settlement). In many countcollaboration<br />

and planning across government 1ev- tries, key responsibilities of local governmentsels.<br />

For example, water and santitation investment including the ability to tax or to charge user feesdecisions<br />

made by regional utilities have to be coor- can be suspended by the central bureaucracy withdinated<br />

with local land-use planning.. And linilta- out consultation. T-his lack of autonomy discourages.<br />

tions are often imnposed by local capacity. In Brazil, local administrators and contributes to a popular<br />

although municipalities are constitutionally as- image of local government inefficiency or even corsigned<br />

respons-ibility for delivery of urban water, re- muption. Accounts and audits are important sources<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!