30.08.2014 Views

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Box 1.7 Infastiucture activities tireaten the Black Sea environment<br />

The Black Sea is fed by a basin of more than 2 million. dedine in the once-productive Black Sea fishery over the<br />

square kilometers;-covering parts of seventeen countries last thirty years.<br />

in Central and Eastem Europe, the forner Soviet Union, With assistance from the Global Environment Fadland<br />

Turkl It receives the inflows of several major ity the six Black Sea countries (Bulgaria, Georgia. Romarivers,<br />

including the Danube, Don, Dnieper, and. nia, Russia, Turke, and Ukraine) have begun a reional<br />

Dnieste= As an almost fully endosed water body, the program to analyze the causes of observed environmen-<br />

Black Seais especiallyvulnerable to changes in the quan- tal degradation and to propose solutions. Actions in the<br />

lity and quality of inflows from these niverm The Don basin to regulate fertilizer use -and to control point<br />

and Dnieper, in partitalar, have been highly developed sources of pollution ar expected to result in reductions<br />

for irrigation and other purposes through a dhain of of nutrient-inflowss Pilot projects are proposed to restore<br />

reservois- : fish production under the new salinitv conditions.<br />

Increasing pollutant loads from these rivers-espe- Under the Bank-supported Environmental Management<br />

dialy the nutrients ntrogei and phosphorus-have led Project for Russia, a study of the Lower Don Basin will<br />

to algal blooms and the destruction of important nurserv investigate ways to alter the operating rules -for the<br />

areas for fish. In addition, damming of the major rvers major reservoirs to promote greater fish regeneration<br />

for navigation, flood control, water supply, and, above downstreamall<br />

for irrigation, has considerably altered the seasonal Given the size of the problern and the importance of<br />

flow patterns of these rivers The damming has also de- these reservoirs in the agricultural economies of Ukraine<br />

creased the total inflow to the Bladc Sea, resulting in an and Russia, it would be unrealistic to expect dramatic<br />

increase in salinity in critical coastal and estuarine areas, changes Nevertheless, recognition of the problem and<br />

especially in the Sea of Azov, wthich creates further prob- the development of mechanisnis for regional cooperalems<br />

for fish breeding. The overall result is a 90 percent tion now make progress much more likely.<br />

ments in most countries have not taken advantage in such circums ances, other means of making supof<br />

the potential for competition, even in activities pliers accountable to users are needed. Through<br />

where a natural monopoly does not exist, such as various mechanisms designed to broaden participa--<br />

road freight transport or solid waste collection. tion in decisionmaking and to provide wide access<br />

Today competition can be used directly in more in- to information on infrastructure provision, users<br />

frastructure activities because of technological and other key stakeholders can be represented in<br />

changes. In telecommunications, satellite, mi- (and sometimes take responsibility -for) the plancrowave,<br />

and cellular radio transmission of tele- ning, financing, and delivery of services.<br />

phone signals is revolutionizing the industry, making<br />

the economies of scale with cable-based Opportunity knockstransmission<br />

less important. In power generation,<br />

combined-cycle gas turbines operate efficiently at Many of the above notions are not new, and some<br />

lower output levels -than other generation technolo- have been accepted in principle by policymakers if<br />

gies. While open competition for users in the market not yet put successfully into practice. Three facis<br />

still not feasible in many infrastructure areas, tors-technological change, more pragmatic attithere<br />

are other ways of obtaining the benefits of tudes, and a greater sensitivity to infrastructure's<br />

competition. For activities with high sunk costs, implications for poverty and environmental suscompeting<br />

for the right to operate a monopoly can tainabiLity-have created a new climate for recapture.<br />

many of these benefits. Even where the form. Innovative techniques for drawing on prinumber<br />

of operators is necessarily limited, regula- vate financing for investment create a further<br />

tion can compel them to compete against perfor- challenge to traditional ways of providing inframance<br />

benchmarks ("yardstick" competition)- structure. Many countries are now taking advantage<br />

of all these opportunities to test new ideas<br />

INVOLVEMENT OF USERS AND OTE{R SrAKEHOLDERS. and approaches, discussed in later chapters of this<br />

In many infrastructure activities, market signals Reportcannot<br />

be relied on to provide information about<br />

demand or to gauge performance. Where users are TECHNOLOGY. Technological changes are creating<br />

locked into a delivery network, they cannot express a varety of new opportunities for changing the way<br />

their preferences or dissatisfaction through choice. infrastructure is provided in almost every sector-<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!