30.08.2014 Views

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

financial covenants are made. In such situations, ance market is to provide- insurance for traffic risk<br />

:--::.commnexial banks have a much greater incentive fora Mexican tol road.<br />

for supervising projects than do lenders backed by<br />

sovereign guarantees. SECrOR POucy-wIuc mIC. S Especially impor-<br />

-The evidence, although limited, shows that the tant issues arise in the power sector because project<br />

assumption of cost-related risks by private sponsors sponsors focus on the credibility and solvency of<br />

and the monitoring of performance by banks are ef- their buyer,- typically a government utility that<br />

fecive. Evidence, for exanple, on private construc- transmits and distributes power. The instrument<br />

tion is very favorable and reflects the tight contrac- that protects the power supplier is the "take-or-pay"<br />

tual conditions and severe penalties for cost and contract, or power purchase agreement Under such<br />

time oveuns. A preliminary review of the FC's in- a contract, the buyer agrees to pay a specfied<br />

frastucture projects shows that time overruns in amount regardless of whether the service is used.<br />

construction have been only seven months on aver- The government thus provides a contract comphage,<br />

and cost performance has been about on target ance guarantee-a useful transitional measunre<br />

Such performance, however, is possible only when while the long-term goal of sectr reorm is being<br />

commercial risks are truly transferred to private addressed (Box 5.8).<br />

sponsors. The Mexican toil-road example shows Similar concerns arise with water and other envithat<br />

when nsks can, inpractice, be transferred back ronmentat infrastructure projects (such as water<br />

to the government, incentives for performance are supply, wastewater treatment, and solid waste disgreatly<br />

weakened.<br />

posal operations that are typically carried out at the<br />

Private investors may wish to insure themselves municipal level by a local monopoly). Here governmagamist<br />

commercial risks. The provision of such in- ment agencies (or municipal authorities) are not the<br />

surance is best left to the private sector, although direct purchasers of the service. But they can and do<br />

governments have a role in stimulating domestic influence the ability of the service provider to meter,<br />

-guaranty facilities, possibly by taking an. initial bill, and collect Where the municpal authorities<br />

stake in guaranty funds (Box 5.7). The private mar- cannot deliver, collection guarantees from the cenket<br />

for risk insurance for international transactions tral governmentarerequired.<br />

is small While short-term insunce for trade credit Thus, in such projects, the "market risk, or the<br />

is available, pnivate insurance for infrastructure risk arising from fluctuations in demand, is effec-<br />

.- - projecs is uncommon, although the London insur- tively transferred to the government through the<br />

Box 5.. Leveragigthrough guarantees in Thailand<br />

To encouTage private lndin the Thai government is zopolitan Region, and Bangkok ilseif are expected to be<br />

--deveoping the Thai Guaranty Facility to gurantee the primary benefidaries of loanguarantees for investokans<br />

made by prvate financial institutions to munid- ments in wastewater ttm ent, solid waste collection.<br />

-palities and private operators of urban envital and disposal, and potable wate supply.<br />

infrastuctu;m The facility is planned as a pubi-private During its-first two years of operation, the guaranty<br />

corporation with prvate sector munagemL The tge facility is expected to recive $75 million. Lending will<br />

date forinitial operation of thefacility is June l99t4 be five to eight times the level of these guarantyr funds.<br />

-Because of limited experiencein lending to mwnii- Over a five-year. period, it is prjected tat the fility<br />

polities, financal institutions consider them risky bor- will.be fiuded at a level of S150 million and will leverrvowers.<br />

Pehrceivig igh project risks, lenders are reluc- age up to $12 billion in loans for urban environmental<br />

tant- to malke loans for periods of-longer than eight infrastructure. projts It will obtain rpources princ-<br />

. years-too short tD recoup investment from envirn- paily fhm the Thai governt om money borrwed<br />

mental inhastrucht:..<br />

in part from the USAID Housing Guaranty Potgram and<br />

By pmrviding guarantees to private operators and in part from Thai finanal imstitutions. -<br />

-nmunicipalities that help them to secure loans from Cont- A setof policy initiatives is also beingestablished to<br />

- meial lenders, the g rens guaranty facility wMil ensure the effectiveness of this facility, including a move<br />

create longer-term financg With increased lending to toward the "poluter-pays" priridpk change in adminlocal<br />

govemnment it. will soon be posble to establish : istrative procedures, and greaterdecentralization, of<br />

: credit ratings fbr dtiesand to allow them toissue bonds. decisionmadg.- .<br />

Ten provincil dities, the five cities of the Banok Met-<br />

I*.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!