30.08.2014 Views

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 6.8 Savings from increased efficiency<br />

*bflf-onsar US. doRms) -the<br />

- income, and therefore virtually all countries have<br />

potential to make significant gains.<br />

Sedor SWings Souwreof inefficiency Passing up such gains translates directly into<br />

Roads 15 Annual inveshnentrqyirements - human costs because it means limiting progress in<br />

created by improper maintenance readcing the 1 billion people who stiIl lack safe<br />

Powser 30 Transmission, distnbution, and<br />

generation losses<br />

drinkdng water and the nearly 2 billion who lack ac-<br />

cess to electricity and adequate sanitation facilities.<br />

Water 4 Leakage At current costs of roughly $150 per person for<br />

Railurays 6 Excess fuel use, ovestaffing, and water systems, the redirection over three years of<br />

locomotive unavailability just the annual quantifiable technical losses of $55<br />

Tobl 55 - - billion would mean that the 1 billion people without<br />

Soon= Ingum and Fav 199.<br />

safe drinking water could be served.<br />

Thus, although impossible to quantify globally,<br />

the most important potential payoffs almost certainly<br />

go beyond limiting financial losses and imciency<br />

The savings that could be achieved by rais- proving technical efficiency and would result in<br />

ing the efficiency of operation from current levels to gains both in economic progress and for the poorattainable<br />

best-practice levels are estimated at Better services improve productivity and well-being<br />

roughly $55 billion (Table 6.8). These represent pure throughout an economy. Increasing the reliability of<br />

resource savings to the economy. Although the esti- power and telecommunications will save businesses<br />

mates cover only certain sectors and only some of lost output and redundant investnents. Betterthe<br />

technical losses in those sectors, the effiacency maintained roads will lower the costs of vehide opcosts<br />

are equivalent to 1 percent of developing eration. Improved rural infrastructure can raise the<br />

countries' GDP and are more than twice the annual incomes of the rural poor from farm and nonfarm<br />

development assistance flows for astrc activities. Better water and sanitation are critical to<br />

One-quarter of the $200 billion annual investment in the poor, who spend time and money cmpesatig<br />

infrastructure by developing- countries could be for inadequate infrastructure. All of these improvegenerated<br />

just from feasible tedhnical savings. Not ments will contribute to raising living standardsonly<br />

low-income countries stand to benefiL Al- by increasngwages m more productive businesses,<br />

though access to ifrastructure increases as incomes lowering prices through more efficient transport,<br />

rise, infrastructure efficency is not dosely related to and elhancing the quality of life for individuals.<br />

12Z2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!