ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT
ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT
ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cofinancing Facility (ECO)-to cover soveregn mediation through capital markets. Infrastructure<br />
risks associated with infrastuture projects. This fa-. developers and private (especially contractual)<br />
cility, designed to improve developing country ac- savers share a long-term horizon. Bringing compaticess<br />
to international capital markets, has been used ble savers and investors together is the task of capifor<br />
the Hub River Project in Pakistan and a thermal tal markets. At the same time, the financing of infrapower<br />
project in China.-The Multilateral Investment structure projects improves appraisal capabilities<br />
Guarantee Agency (MIGA)-another World Bank and expands risk-diversification possibilities for<br />
affiliate-has also provided guarantees for several local commercial banks, equity and bond markets,<br />
infrastructure projects.<br />
and institutional investors such as insurance comn-<br />
:. . =; - -- - . - ~~~~~panies and pension fuinis. Exploitation.of these-<br />
Institutions and instruments for resource p a p f E o t<br />
mobilization................... links can be promoted - through prudent regulation,.<br />
-.- mobllashon.------<br />
improved disclosure and reporting standards, and<br />
If the trend tDward private investment in infra- the development of credit-rating capabilities and<br />
structure is to continue, financial markets will have credit risk insurance.<br />
to respond by providing the necessary long-term<br />
- = - , . . - . - . 17~~~~~~~~l,Xstrucfure<br />
resource Paralleling the innovations described<br />
deuelopnieat bat& ..-<br />
above in the structuring of contractual agree- In many countries, spealized development banks<br />
ments-which are critical to making a project fi- are a conduit for funds used in infrastructure projnanceable-lessons<br />
have been learned about deliv- ects, especially for municipal infrastructure such as<br />
ermg long-term finance through alternative water, solid waste collection and disposal, and local<br />
institutions and instments.<br />
roads. For municipalities, borrowing fiom such<br />
Both foreign and domestic sources of capital will institutions supplements local taxes and central<br />
need to be tapped. Reliance on foreign savings re- government transfers and is intended to cover flucmains<br />
a necessity for many countries with inade- tuations in expenditure or to prevent large shifts in<br />
quate domestic savings. But there are limits to the revenue requirements.<br />
capaity- of any economy to access funds from In developing countries, such specialized infraabroad,<br />
particularly for debt finance. External bor- structure development banks have suffered from all<br />
rowing must be serviced laigely by domestic rev- the negative features associated with govemment<br />
enues. Overall balance of payments constraints and ownership, such as inefficient targeting and subsithe<br />
sheer size of infrastructure investments imply, dization of lendin& interference in operations, and<br />
for most countries, that a sustained infrastructure corruptionL Inadequate diversification of risk has<br />
program wiil have to be accompanied by a strategy also led to periods of heavy demand followed by<br />
for mobilizing domestic funds. In turn, an increas- substantial slack Moreover, the banks' traditional<br />
ing share of domestic savings will need to come function as conduits of government funds is inconfrom<br />
private sources as governments reduce their sistent with the trend toward less reliance on-govinvolvement<br />
in infrastructure. - errnent budgets and imcreased use of private sav-<br />
As the dominant owner and supplier of infra- ings to finance infrastructure.<br />
structure, however, govemments will continue to be In industrial countries, with stronger traditions<br />
a major user of funds, as well as a conduit for re- of autonomy and solid appraisal capabilities, infrasources<br />
from multilateral development banks. Mu- structure banks have performed better. In Japan,<br />
nicipal governments (esponsible for large and postal savings have constituted the pnmary source<br />
growing urban infrastructure) represent a major of long-term funds used bv such institutions as the<br />
source of demand for financial resources. To meet Japan Development Bank (1DB) to finance infratheir<br />
needs, new initiatives are being tried, indud- structure. The JDB has been crucial to past infraing<br />
the revitalizing of existing ifrastructure Iending structure development, and even today, with the<br />
institutions. Govemments are also creating special- move toward public-private partnersNhips, it continized<br />
infrastructure funds (discussed later) as a tran- ues to play a major role in financing, often at highly<br />
sitional measure to make long-term financing avail- subsidized rates. In Europe, municipal banks-ob-<br />
-able where- private financing is -not likely to be tning their resources from contractual savings insufficient<br />
Specialized infrastructure banks and stitutions -and other long-term sources-have genfuncds<br />
are imperfect mechanism that need increas eraily performed well where local governments<br />
ingly to acquire marketlike discipline, and their have had operational independence.<br />
value needs to be assessed periodically. . Few municipal banks in developing countries,<br />
Synergistic links can develop between private in- however, have shown a capacity-for sustained infrastructure<br />
projects and domestic financial inter- vestment, largely because of undercapitalization,.<br />
102.