30.08.2014 Views

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

ASi" kUCTURE FlOR DEVELOPMENT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

maintains the full profits of the incumbent and is electricity is supplied in this form Because pool<br />

also socially optimal if the network is efficiently prices tend to be volatile and unpredictable, both<br />

priced and operated. In New Zealand such a rule suppliers and buyers (mainly regional distributors)<br />

has led to new entry, although the rule has been tend to enter into long-term contracts as well, relychallenged<br />

by the new entrant as anticompetitive. ing on the spot market for a relativelv small share of<br />

Other approaches seek to encourage entry by limit- transactions. Having a choice of suppliers when'<br />

ing interconnection charges to full costs incurred by contracts are renegotiated maintains competitive<br />

the incumbent (exduding profits accruing on the discipline.<br />

link). Such charges (e.g., those in Australia) include If generating capacity is concentrated in one or<br />

an element for fixed costs of the network as well as two firns, they can try to influence the price at<br />

costs incurred due to universal service obligations. which electricity is purchased from them. Anti-<br />

The interconnection issue is acquirng increasing trust laws can be used to prevent monopolistic or<br />

importance in developing countries, and especiallry collusive behavior. Effective competition, howin<br />

Eastemr Eirope where multiple operators have ever, may require splitting large generators into<br />

been licensed. In Poland, for example, a 1990 new companies.<br />

telecommunications law allowed independent oper- Competition in electric power is being extended<br />

ators the right to develop networks in regions not to retail distribution in the United Kingdom, startserved<br />

by the government-owned telecommunica- ing with large consumers. Users wlhose peak detions<br />

provider Telekomunikacja (TIP SA). Three mand is 100 kilowatts of power or more are not relarge<br />

independent operators have been licensed to stricted to their local distributor, but may contract<br />

provide local services, in addition to almost sixty with other distributors or directly with generators.<br />

other small providers. Interconnection between TP About 45,000 businesses are eligible to shop for elec-<br />

SA and the independent operators involves provid- tricity in this way. All customers will be able to do<br />

ing access to each company's network and sharing so by 1998.<br />

revenues from this access. To date there is no one In many developing countries, one legacy of<br />

standard interconnection agreement between TP SA poor public sector performance is the large underand<br />

the independents. The telecommunication law used generation capacity of many large manufacturstates<br />

that each independent company must negoti- ing fims. The market for electricity can be made<br />

ate its own separate agreement with TP SA. This more contestable by allowing large manufacturers<br />

lack of standard agreement has prevented the ma- with their own generating capacity to sell electricity<br />

ority of the independents from further pusuingthe to the public grid, creating competitive discipline<br />

development of their local network Without inter- and fostering cost reduction. A systematic study<br />

connection, outside investors are hesitant to commit shows that, if firms in Nigeria were allowed to sell<br />

any resources until a strong and fair contract is es- power from their underused generating capacity,<br />

tablishedL Alternative models are being examined to the unit .osts of electricity produced by these firnsprovide<br />

interconnection on fair terms. Developing would fall considerably. Informal evidence suggests<br />

countries seeking to expand networks and new ser- that the samne is likely to be the case in many develvices<br />

may wish to consider a pricing system favor- oping countries.<br />

able to entry, effective antimonopoly legislation, and<br />

procedures for implementing both.<br />

Where direct competition is not possible, efficiency<br />

POWER. Electricity generation is another area in can be increased by means of competition managed<br />

which unbundling can introduce competitioiL through contractual arrangements, ranging from<br />

Using similar approaches in electric power genera- simple contracts for 5pecific services -to long-term<br />

tion, Argentina, Chile, Norway, and the United concessions that require operation, maintenance,<br />

Kingdom have created electricity pools that simu- and facility expansiorL Although there is only a sinlate<br />

competitive market conditions. Generators bid gle supplier of the service at any point in time, comfor<br />

the right to supply bulk electricity in time slots petition occurs before the contract is signed and, in<br />

(as short as half an hour in the United Kingdom) by principle, when the contract (or concession) expires<br />

specifying a supply schedule of price and quantity. and is due fur renewaL Thus, there is competition<br />

The power pool manager aggregates these offers for the market even though there is no direct compeand<br />

arrives at a systemwide price based on esti- tition in the market during the term of the concesmates<br />

of demand for the particular slot All offers sion. The commitments entered into through :the<br />

below this "pool price" are then accepted. Not all contract can then, within limits, provide an alterna-<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!