s - Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna we Wrocławiu

186
Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska
However, there are some unnecessary English intrusions, which are hard to
account for (2006: 219, 221, 278):
[21] Mr. Bystry za każdym razem wali się na deski nokautowany przez Mr. Fajnego (219); 21
[22] British Parliament produkuje nie mniejszą liczbę przepisów niż inne parlamenty (278). 22
The conclusion is that the examples of code-mixing of this type are most
likely to be indicative of the author’s self-styling.
4.4. Misuses
The fourth group of examples (16 out of 102) is a collection of cases that in
most circumstances would be interpreted as misuses resulting from crosslinguistic
and cross-cultural interference. One sub-type of code-mixing here is
false cognates, which are words that have similar form, but different or only
partly overlapping meanings in both languages, see Ostrowski (2006: 169, 170,
176, 182, 187, 249).
[23] Zdumiewające jak mistycznych i sensualnych pojęć używa Pimlott (169); 23
[24] Opisuje rozmaite przekręty finansowe tak detalicznie (249). 24
By examining the co-texts of the above words, one may conclude that what
the author means when he uses sensualny (from “sensual”) is zmysłowy, and
detaliczny (from “detailed”) is in fact szczegółowy. It seems that in the Polish
lexicon there are somewhat better alternatives to the cognates chosen by the
author, which add difficulty to extracting the appropriate meaning.
Another problem is Ostrowski’s (2006: 162, 283) manner of translating
English idioms and cultural references. Idiomatic phrases are not usually translated
into the target language, as they do not carry the same connotations, evaluations
and symbolic associations as the source language, as is the case with the
noun phrase porządek dziobania [“pecking order”] (283). What can also be
confusing is the fact that Ostrowski (2006: 221, 226) uses the same word agenda,
once in accordance with its Polish sense – as a synonym to agencja
[“agency”], and some other time in its English usage – “an item to be discussed
in an official meeting”. One more identifiable type of code-mixing is
represented by transpositions of historical references (e.g., the Founding Fathers,
the battle of Gettysburg, the Great Communicator) that are likely to be
generally known in the Anglo-American world, but which mean little to Polish
21
22
23
24
Mr. Clever is always knocked out by Mr. Cute.
British Parliament produces no less legislation than other parliaments.
It is astounding to see what mystical and sensual concepts are used by Pimlott.
He describes financial tricks in such a detailed way.