25.02.2015 Views

s - Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna we Wrocławiu

s - Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna we Wrocławiu

s - Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna we Wrocławiu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54<br />

Gabriela Brozbă<br />

Rooy and Van Huyssteen (2000), suggests that the dominant substitute for<br />

schwa is [ɛ] in most syllabic positions, except for open final syllables. Ho<strong>we</strong>ver,<br />

he wars us that the frequency of schwa might be actually higher than it is usually<br />

believed, but its distribution is slightly different from that of RP because of<br />

BSAE differences in stress placement. Van Rooy (2008: 180) writes that there<br />

also is a preference for spelling pronunciation so that [ɔ] will be heard in a word<br />

like opportunity. Apart from that, there is a tendency to have [ʊ] bet<strong>we</strong>en a labial<br />

obstruent and a final lateral, in words such as double or careful. It clearly<br />

suggests a case of transcategorial progressive assimilation of the C-to-V type.<br />

That is, the [LABIAL] consonants, /b/ and /f/ impose the selection of a vo<strong>we</strong>l<br />

which has the feature [LABIAL] in avoiding syllabic consonants. This phenomenon<br />

is also attested in Mesthrie (2005) where in labial contexts the vo<strong>we</strong>l which<br />

surfaces instead of schwa is [u] [4a]. In non-labial contexts other vo<strong>we</strong>ls are<br />

employed, such as [ɐ] [4b] or [e] [4c] (cf. Mesthrie 2005: 144):<br />

[4a] [ə] > [u]<br />

[4b] [ə] > [ɐ]<br />

[4c] [ə] > [e]<br />

people, apple, table, syllable<br />

single, mingle<br />

handle, dangle<br />

Mesthrie (2005: 144) also notes that especially in words containing low<br />

vo<strong>we</strong>ls a harmonization rule seems to be applied, so that instead of schwa, the<br />

vo<strong>we</strong>l which surfaces agrees in the specification of the [± low] feature with the<br />

preceding vo<strong>we</strong>l (cf. Mesthrie 2005: 144):<br />

[5a] government<br />

[5b] adamant<br />

[5c] balance<br />

[5d] ambassador<br />

[5e] salad<br />

[gavɐmɛnt]<br />

[adɐmant]<br />

[balɐns]<br />

[ambasɐdɐ]<br />

[salɐd]<br />

Reverting to Mesthrie’s study (2005), the following tendencies can be observed.<br />

The basilectal speaker pronounces schwa only occasionally and in fast<br />

speech for that [1d], and even for articles its occurrence is very limited: the<br />

definite article the is pronounced with [ɐ] in ten tokens, and only in one with<br />

schwa, whereas for the indefinite article a schwa is never heard. In word-final<br />

suffixes a variety of vo<strong>we</strong>ls are used to replace a potential [ə] (cf. Mesthrie<br />

2005: 140):<br />

[6a] /ə/ > [i] -tion (education) [-ʃin]<br />

[6b] /ə/ > [ɐ] -ed (wanted, started) [ɐd]<br />

In the speech of the mesolectal user, schwa is still uncommon, while the<br />

acrolectal speaker produced schwa in words like other or the. Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, [ɐ] is<br />

still preferred in words like tournament, victors, practical or sector.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!