25.02.2015 Views

s - Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna we Wrocławiu

s - Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna we Wrocławiu

s - Wyższa Szkoła Filologiczna we Wrocławiu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On the variability of vocalic inventory in Black South African English 57<br />

2500<br />

2400<br />

2300<br />

Ǻ ~ i<br />

2200<br />

2100<br />

2000<br />

1900<br />

1800<br />

1700<br />

1600<br />

1500<br />

1400<br />

1300<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

PRICE<br />

FACE<br />

F2-Backness (Hz)<br />

ǫ<br />

CHOICE<br />

a<br />

Ȝ<br />

Ǥ<br />

o<br />

GOAT<br />

MOUTH<br />

u ~ Ț<br />

200<br />

300<br />

400<br />

500<br />

600<br />

700<br />

800<br />

900<br />

1000<br />

F1-Height (Hz)<br />

Figure 2. Formant trajectories of BSAE rising diphthongs (Mboniswa)<br />

As can be seen, the female speaker produces all the five rising diphthongs<br />

mentioned by Van Rooy: FACE, PRICE, CHOICE, MOUTH and GOAT. Starting with<br />

the diphthong PRICE, the first target is realized as an open low vo<strong>we</strong>l, lo<strong>we</strong>r than<br />

[ʌ], it actually starts off more in the area of [a], and its trajectory terminates in<br />

the close-front region of the vo<strong>we</strong>l space. The trajectory of the CHOICE diphthong<br />

also ends in the area of the front close vo<strong>we</strong>ls but its offset vo<strong>we</strong>l target is<br />

rather tense as its mean F1 is of 431 Hz; the onset of its second vo<strong>we</strong>l target is<br />

close to the mid-open back round vo<strong>we</strong>l [ɔ]. The offset vo<strong>we</strong>l target of the FACE<br />

diphthong is very similar to that of the PRICE diphthong, as they are very close<br />

to each other in the vo<strong>we</strong>l space, whereas its first vo<strong>we</strong>l target is still in the area<br />

of front vo<strong>we</strong>ls, more precisely, it is the mid-open front [ɛ]: remember that the<br />

F1 of mid-open front [ɛ] in Table 1 was 482 Hz and the F1 value at the first<br />

target time is 488 Hz. Moving on to the diphthongs whose trajectories’ offsets<br />

are represented by back vo<strong>we</strong>ls, one can notice that the MOUTH diphthong displays<br />

greater formant movement.<br />

Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, the GOAT diphthong clearly involves some gliding from one vocalic<br />

position to another: it starts off in the area of the mid-close round back<br />

vo<strong>we</strong>l and it rises towards a close back round vo<strong>we</strong>l which is rather lax than<br />

tense if one maps the value of the F1 at the second target time (354 Hz) onto the<br />

mean F1 of the FOOT or GOOSE vo<strong>we</strong>ls in Table 1 (somewhere around 300 Hz).<br />

The trajectory of the MOUTH diphthong shows that it is a bit fronted at a certain<br />

point, to end up in about the same vocalic position as the preceding one.<br />

The falling diphthongs, not surprisingly, are commonly monophthongized.<br />

Since the vo<strong>we</strong>l schwa is avoided in BSAE, the second target vo<strong>we</strong>l of the<br />

original diphthong is usually lost and what remains behind is a monophthong.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!