04.07.2015 Views

Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW

Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW

Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fungal Diversity<br />

pseudoparaphyses (Fig. 61c). Hamathecium of dense, narrow<br />

cellular pseudoparaphyses, 2–4.5 μm broad, septate (Fig. 61f).<br />

Asci 153–170(−200)×17.5–21.5 μm (including pedicel),<br />

bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindro-clavate to clavate, pedicel<br />

28–60(−85) μm long, 8-spored, biseriate, with an ocular<br />

chamber best seen in immature ascus (to 3 μm wide×3 μm<br />

high) (Fig. 61d and e). Ascospores 24–29×9–11 μm, oblong to<br />

narrowly oblong, straight or somewhat curved, reddish brown<br />

to dark yellowish brown, verruculose, with five transverse<br />

septa and one vertical septum in each middle cells, constricted<br />

at the primary and secondary primary septa (Fig. 61g).<br />

Anamorph: none reported.<br />

Material examined: PORTUGAL, Coimbra Lusitania,<br />

on leaves of Fourcroya longava pr., Feb., 1881, leg. Moller.<br />

(M 1183, holotype).<br />

Notes<br />

Morphology<br />

Montagnula was introduced to accommodate two Pleospora<br />

species, i.e. P. infernalis (Niessl) Wehm. and P.<br />

gigantea Mont. by Berlese (1896), based on the presence of<br />

hyphal stromatic tissues over the ascomata and asci with<br />

relatively long pedicels (Barr 2001). Montagnula infernalis<br />

was selected as the lectotype species (Clements and Shear<br />

1931). Subsequently, Wehmeyer (1957, 1961) treated Montagnula<br />

as a subgenus of Pleospora. Crivelli(1983) accepted<br />

Montagnula as a separate genus, and divided it into two<br />

subgenera, i.e. Montagnula and Rubiginospora. Montagnula<br />

was characterized by having dark brown ascospores and<br />

exclusively occurring on Agavaceae, while Rubiginospora<br />

has reddish brown ascospores and occurs on Poaceae. This<br />

proposal was not accepted by many workers (Barr 2001).<br />

Subsequently, more species with various ascospores (such as<br />

phragmosporous species by Leuchtmann (1984) and didymosporous<br />

species by Aptroot (1995) were added in this<br />

genus), which has obviously become heterogenic. Barr<br />

(2001) assigned species of Montagnula into different genera,<br />

i.e. Kalmusia and Didymosphaerella, respectively and introduced<br />

Montagnulaceae to accommodate all of these genera.<br />

Phylogenetic study<br />

Montagnula opulenta forms a robust phylogenetic clade<br />

with species of Bimuria, Curreya, Didymocrea, Letendraea,<br />

Paraphaeosphaeria, Phaeodothis and Karstenula,<br />

which might represent a familial group (Schoch et al. 2006;<br />

Zhang et al. 2009a). A more convincing conclusion can<br />

only be obtained following sequence data from more<br />

verified fungi being added to the phylogenetic tree.<br />

Concluding remarks<br />

One striking character of Montagnula infernalis is the very<br />

long ascal pedicel once it is released from the ascomata.<br />

However, this character appears to have evolved more than<br />

once and can be found in Kirschsteiniothelia elaterascus<br />

Shearer which clusters with Helicascus (Shearer et al. 2009).<br />

The same ascus character is also found in Xenolophium and<br />

Ostropella in the Platystomaceae (Mugambi and Huhndorf<br />

2009b). Montagnula opulenta is a didymosporous species,<br />

but phylogenetically closely related to those dictyosporous<br />

(Karstenula rhodostoma) and phragmosporous (Paraphaeosphaeria<br />

michotii) members of Montagnulaceae (Zhang et al.<br />

2009a). This might indicate that compared to other morphological<br />

characters, ascospore type is not a valid character at<br />

family level classification.<br />

Moristroma A.I. Romero & Samuels, Sydowia 43: 246<br />

(1991). (<strong>Pleosporales</strong>, genera incertae sedis)<br />

Generic description<br />

Habitat terrestrial, saprobic. Ascomata medium-sized, solitary,<br />

scattered, or in small groups, superficial, cushion-like, circular<br />

in outline, wall black, roughened, containing numerous<br />

locules. Peridium thin, 1-layered. Hamathecium of dense, long<br />

filliform pseudoparaphyses, 2–3 μm broad, septate, branching.<br />

Asci polysporous, with a short, laterally displaced, sometimes<br />

papillate knob-shaped pedicel, apex very thick walled,<br />

bitunicate, fissitunicate, obclavate, ocular chamber not observed.<br />

Polyspores oblong to cylindrical, hyaline, non-septate.<br />

Anamorphs reported for genus: none.<br />

Literature: Eriksson 2006; Romero and Samuels 1991.<br />

Type species<br />

Moristroma polysporum A.I. Romero & Samuels, Sydowia<br />

43: 246 (1991). (Fig. 62)<br />

Ascomata 100–210 μm high×340–600 μm diam., solitary,<br />

scattered, or in small groups of 2–3, superficial, with basal<br />

wall remaining immersed in host tissue, cushion-like,<br />

circular in outline, wall black, roughened, containing<br />

numerous locules, each locule 120–240 μm diam., ostiolate<br />

(Fig. 62a and b). Peridium 14–30 μm thick, 1-layered,<br />

composed of small heavily pigmented thick-walled cells of<br />

textura angularis, cells2–4 μm diam., cell wall 1.5–3 μm<br />

thick, peridium between the locules hyaline (Fig. 62b and c).<br />

Hamathecium of dense, long filliform pseudoparaphyses, 2–<br />

3 μm broad, septate, branching. Asci 44–60×12–14 μm<br />

(x ¼ 54:3 13mm, n=10), polysporous, with a short, papillate<br />

knob-shaped pedicel, apex very thick-walled, bitunicate,<br />

fissitunicate, obclavate, ocular chamber not observed<br />

(Fig. 62d and e). Polyspores 3–4(−5)×0.6–1.2 μm, oblong<br />

to cylindrical, hyaline, non-septate, smooth (Fig. 62f).<br />

Anamorph: none reported.<br />

Material examined: ARGENTINA, Buenos Aires,<br />

Ramallo, on Eucalyptus viminalis Labill., May 1982, Romero

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!