Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fungal Diversity long to elongated oblong, hyaline, 1-celled, usually slightly curved (Fig. 105c,d and e). Anamorph: none reported. Material examined: JAPAN, Province Ugo. on moribund culm of Sasa kurilensis, 4 Aug. 1957, coll. H. Muroi, Det. I. Hino & K. Katumoto (TNS-F-230252, isotype). Notes Morphology Muroia was introduced based on M. nipponica, which is a parasite on the lower part of Sasa kurilensis (Hino and Katumoto 1958). Muroia is characterized by its 1-celled ascospores. Considering the perithecial structure and linear ostiole, it was assigned to the Lophiostomataceae, and was regarded as closely related to the amerosporous Lophiella (Hino and Katumoto 1958). Phylogenetic study None. Concluding remarks The linear ascostroma and 1-celled, hyaline ascospores make it less likely to fit the concept of Lophiostomataceae. Because of the condition of the specimen, its bitunicate nature could not be confirmed. Genera not studied Aglaospora De Not., G. bot. ital. 2: 43 (1844). Type species: Aglaospora profusa (Fr.) De Not., G. bot. ital. 2: 43 (1844). Aglaospora, which was introduced by de Notaris (1844), has 35 species epithets (http://www.mycobank. org/mycotaxo.aspx) and was considered to be a synonym of Massaria (Voglmayr and Jaklitsch 2011) orseparate (Barr 1990a). In a recent phylogenetic study, Voglmayr and Jaklitsch (2011) confirmed that Aglaospora is a synonym of Massaria and is treated as such here. The immersed ascomata with short beaks, together with ascostroma under pseudostromatic tissues, cylindrical asci with a large and refractive apical ring, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses within a gel matrix, and distoseptate ascospores, are all similar to species of Massaria. The large and conspicuous apical ring of the ascus of Aglaospora has the appearance of being unitunicate, and thus Shoemaker and Kokko (1977) treatedit as a unitunicate taxon. Currently, its bitunicate status is widely accepted. Allewia E.G. Simmons, Mycotaxon 38: 260 (1990). Type species: Allewia proteae E.G. Simmons, Mycotaxon 38: 262 (1990). Allewia was introduced by Simmons (1990) toaccommodate Lewia-like species but with Embellisia anamorphs. Embellisia differs from other similar genera by a combination of characters including the percentage of dictyoconidia, shape of conidia, thickness of septa, umbilicate sites of conidiophore geniculation, proliferating chlamydospores and hyphal coils in culture (Simmons 1971). Based on multigene phylogenetic analysis, A. eureka, which is closely related to A. proteae, clustered together with species of Alternaria. Thus, Allewia should be treated as a synonym of Lewia. Anteaglonium Mugambi & Huhndorf, System. Biodivers. 7: 460 (2009). Type species: Anteaglonium abbreviatum (Schwein.) Mugambi & Huhndorf, System. Biodivers. 7: 460 (2009). ≡ Hysterium abbreviatum Schwein., Trans. Am. phil. Soc., New Series 4: no. 2094 (1832). Anteaglonium was introduced to accommodate a monophyletic hysterothecial clade within <strong>Pleosporales</strong>, and four species (A. abbreviatum, A. globosum Mugambi & Huhndorf, A. parvulum (W.R. Gerard) Mugambi & Huhndorf and A. latirostrum Mugambi & Huhndorf) are included (Mugambi and Huhndorf 2009a). Anteaglonium is characterized by erumpent to superficial, globose to subglobose or elongate, fusoid to oblong ascomata, which are brown to shiny black, opening by a pronounced or indistinct longitudinal slit running entire length of fruit body or apex raised and laterally compressed; asci cylindrical with short pedicel, 8-spored, uniseriate or biseriate; ascospores fusoid to oblong, septate, constricted at the primary septum, hyaline or pigmented. A phylogenetic analysis based on DNA comparisons indicated that Anteaglonium resides as a separate clade but related to Tetraplosphaeria, Lophiotrema and other species without clear resolution. Therefore, the familial placement of Anteaglonium remains unclear (Mugambi and Huhndorf 2009a). Arthopyrenia A. Massal., Ric. auton. lich. crost. (Verona): 165 (1852). Type species: Arthopyrenia rhyponta (Ach.) A. Massal., Ric. auton. lich. crost. (Verona): 166, fig. 329 (1852). ≡ Verrucaria rhyponta Ach., K. Vetensk-Acad. Nya Handl.: 150 (1809). Arthopyrenia is a lichen genus with a Trentepohlia photobiont and is characterized by dimidiate perithecoid ascomata, which are scattered to irregularly confluent, and have an upper thick clypeate wall composed of periderm cells intermixed with dark hyphae. The pseudoparaphyses are branched and asci are obpyriform, obclavate to subcylindrical and 8-spored. Ascospores are oblong, ovoid, slipper-shaped, 1-3-septate, hyaline and smooth-walled (Coppins 1988;
Fungal Diversity Fig. 105 Muroia nipponica (TNS-F-230252, isotype). a Linear ascostroma parallel to the host fibers. b Crashed ascus with ascospores released. c–e Released hyaline ascospores. Scale bars: a=5 mm, b–e=30 μm Upreti and Pant 1993). Multigene phylogenetic studies indicated that Arthopyrenia salicis, a typical species of Arthopyrenia, is located within <strong>Pleosporales</strong> in close proximity to bambusicolous species in the genus Roussoella, with its familial status remaining undetermined (Del Prado et al. 2006; Schochetal.2009; Zhang et al. 2009a). Ascocratera Kohlm., Can. J. Bot. 64: 3036 (1986). Type species: Ascocratera manglicola Kohlm., Can. J. Bot. 64(12): 3036 (1986). Ascocratera is a monotypic obligate marine fungus and is characterized by conical, crater-like, erumpent to superficial and carbonaceous ascomata, a depressed ostiole, a thick peridium, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses, bitunicate, fissitunicate and cylindrical asci, and ellipsoidal, hyaline, 1-septate (3-septate when senescent) ascospores surrounded by a sheath (Kohlmeyer 1986). Ascocratera was reported to be one of the most common marine fungi of the upper intertidal zone of dead mangrove roots, trunks and branches (Kohlmeyer 1986). Based on a multigene phylogenetic analysis, Ascocratera nested within the clade of Aigialaceae (Schoch et al. 2009; Suetrong et al. 2009). Atradidymella M.L. Davey & Currah, Am. J. Bot. 96: 1283 (2009). Type species: Atradidymella muscivora M.L. Davey & Currah, Am. J. Bot. 96: 1283 (2009). Atradidymella was introduced as a pleosporalean genus parasitic on boreal bryophytes, and is characterized by
Page 1 and 2:
Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225
Page 3 and 4:
Fungal Diversity Table 1 Major circ
Page 5 and 6:
Fungal Diversity
Page 7 and 8:
Fungal Diversity biocontrol agent o
Page 9 and 10:
Fungal Diversity substrates and man
Page 11 and 12:
Fungal Diversity 2. To investigate
Page 13 and 14:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Fungal Diversity
Page 21 and 22:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 2 Aigialus gr
Page 23 and 24:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 3 Amniculicol
Page 25 and 26:
Fungal Diversity Literature: Berkel
Page 27 and 28:
Fungal Diversity Ascorhombispora L.
Page 29 and 30:
Fungal Diversity
Page 31 and 32:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 8 Astrosphaer
Page 33 and 34:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 9 Asymmetrico
Page 35 and 36:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
Page 37 and 38:
Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
Page 39 and 40:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
Page 41 and 42:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 14 Bimuria no
Page 43 and 44:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 15 Bricookea
Page 45 and 46:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 16 Byssolophi
Page 47 and 48:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
Page 49 and 50:
Fungal Diversity the reaction of pe
Page 51 and 52:
Fungal Diversity
Page 53 and 54:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 21 Chaetomast
Page 55 and 56:
Fungal Diversity
Page 57 and 58:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 23 Cilioplea
Page 59 and 60:
Fungal Diversity with one or two ve
Page 61 and 62:
Fungal Diversity Moreau 1953; Munk
Page 63 and 64:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
Page 65 and 66:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 28 Dothidotth
Page 67 and 68:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 29 Dubitatio
Page 69 and 70:
Fungal Diversity assigned Entodesmi
Page 71 and 72:
Fungal Diversity fusoid to somewhat
Page 73 and 74:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 33 Hadrospora
Page 75 and 76:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 34 Halotthia
Page 77 and 78:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology H
Page 79 and 80:
Fungal Diversity some effused Hypox
Page 81 and 82:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 38 Isthmospor
Page 83 and 84:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 39 Kalmusia e
Page 85 and 86:
Fungal Diversity ascospores were br
Page 87 and 88:
Fungal Diversity furcate pedicel an
Page 89 and 90:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
Page 91 and 92:
Fungal Diversity
Page 93 and 94:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
Page 95 and 96:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 46 Lewia scro
Page 97 and 98:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 47 Lichenopyr
Page 99 and 100:
Fungal Diversity Loculohypoxylon M.
Page 101 and 102:
Fungal Diversity cells small heavil
Page 103 and 104:
Fungal Diversity upper place, septa
Page 105 and 106:
Fungal Diversity
Page 107 and 108:
Fungal Diversity (CBS 627.86) was i
Page 109 and 110:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 54 Mamillisph
Page 111 and 112:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 55 Massarina
Page 113 and 114:
Fungal Diversity phaeria as a synon
Page 115 and 116:
Fungal Diversity 5-8 μm diam., ind
Page 117 and 118:
Fungal Diversity cell wall
Page 119 and 120:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 60 Mixtura sa
Page 121 and 122:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 61 Montagnula
Page 123 and 124:
Fungal Diversity spored, bitunicate
Page 125 and 126:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 64 Murispora
Page 127 and 128:
Fungal Diversity Type species Neoph
Page 129 and 130:
Fungal Diversity brown, 8-septate,
Page 131 and 132:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 68 Ohleria mo
Page 133 and 134:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 69 Ohleriella
Page 135 and 136:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 70 Ophiobolus
Page 137 and 138:
Fungal Diversity Type species Ostro
Page 139 and 140:
Fungal Diversity
Page 141 and 142:
Fungal Diversity (Shoemaker and Bab
Page 143 and 144: Fungal Diversity ium thin, composed
Page 145 and 146: Fungal Diversity Fig. 76 Platysporo
Page 147 and 148: Fungal Diversity Fig. 77 1 Pleomass
Page 149 and 150: Fungal Diversity Fig. 78 Pleophragm
Page 151 and 152: Fungal Diversity papillate, ostiola
Page 153 and 154: Fungal Diversity Williams 1963; Mal
Page 155 and 156: Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
Page 157 and 158: Fungal Diversity composed of one ce
Page 159 and 160: Fungal Diversity Fig. 84 Saccharico
Page 161 and 162: Fungal Diversity and nearly black a
Page 163 and 164: Fungal Diversity dense, long trabec
Page 165 and 166: Fungal Diversity
Page 169 and 170: Fungal Diversity Anamorphs reported
Page 175 and 176: Fungal Diversity Fig. 94 Westerdyke
Page 177 and 178: Fungal Diversity Fig. 95 Wettsteini
Page 179 and 180: Fungal Diversity Fig. 96 Wilmia bra
Page 181 and 182: Fungal Diversity Current name: Astr
Page 183 and 184: Fungal Diversity spores are actuall
Page 185 and 186: Fungal Diversity Fig. 100 Sporormie
Page 189 and 190: Fungal Diversity Fig. 102 Kriegerie
Page 191 and 192: Fungal Diversity Phylogenetic study
Page 193: Fungal Diversity Fig. 104 Zeuctomor
Page 197 and 198: Fungal Diversity pseudoparenchymato
Page 199 and 200: Fungal Diversity Eremodothis Arx, K
Page 201 and 202: Fungal Diversity Type species: Macr
Page 203 and 204: Fungal Diversity ascospores of Plat
Page 205 and 206: Fungal Diversity monoceras Alcorn n
Page 207 and 208: Fungal Diversity tomataceae, Melano
Page 209 and 210: Fungal Diversity Table 4 (continued
Page 211 and 212: Fungal Diversity 1987b). Based on a
Page 213 and 214: Fungal Diversity only do so under v
Page 215 and 216: Fungal Diversity Dennis RWG (1968)
Page 217 and 218: Fungal Diversity Kirk PM, Cannon PF
Page 219 and 220: Fungal Diversity Saccardo PA (1880)
Page 221: Fungal Diversity Winter G (1887) As
show all

Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?