Fungal Diversity hyaline small cells of textura epidermoidea, 2–4 μm diam., cell wall 1–3 μm thick, interspersed with interwoven mycelium in places (Fig. 89b and c). Hamathecium of dense, broadly trabeculate pseudoparaphyses 1–2 μm broad, anastomosing between and above the asci (Fig. 89d). Asci 140–190 (−205)×12.5–15(−17.5) μm (x ¼ 164 14:3mm, n=10), 8- spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, with a short, furcate pedicel, 20–45 μm long, and an inconspicuous ocular chamber (to 2 μm wide×1 μm high) (Fig. 89d and e). Ascospores 20–25× 10–12 μm (x ¼ 22:1 10:3mm, n=10), obliquely uniseriate and partially overlapping, broadly ellipsoid with rounded ends, hyaline, becoming pale brown when mature, 1-septate, constricted at the median septum, smooth (Fig. 89f). Anamorph: none reported. Material examined: CHINA, Kansu Prov., between Scharakuto and Kweite, on rotten stems of Salsola gemmascens Pall., 25 Jul. 1935, G. Fenzel 2400 (W 16366, type). Notes Morphology Sinodidymella was formally established by Yue and Eriksson (1985) as they noticed that Amphididymella verrucosa Petr. was not congeneric with the generic type, A. adeana Petr., which is a pyrenolichen. Thus a new monotypic genus, Sinodidymella was introduced to accommodate it. The most outstanding morphological character of Sinodidymella is its radial ridges, which are somewhat comparable with that of Lophiostoma rugulosum Yin. Zhang, J. Fourn. & K.D. Hyde, although their pseudoparaphyses are dissimilar. Lophiostoma rugulosum has “tightly aggregated cellular pseudoparaphyses” and “apically ending into bunches of clavate cells” (Zhang et al. 2009b). Phylogenetic study None. Concluding remarks The radial ridges have little phylogenetic significance in genus level classification (Zhang et al. 2009b), but the broadly trabeculate pseudoparaphyses of Sinodidymella may fit Melanommataceae. Splanchnonema Corda, in Sturm, Deutschl. Fl., 3 Abt. (Pilze Deutschl.) 2(9), Tome 3: 115 (1829). (?Pleomassariaceae) Generic description Habitat terrestrial, saprobic. Ascomata medium to large, solitary or scattered, immersed in cortex with a pseudostromal covering, with a small ostiole appearing on the host surface, flattened subglobose. Peridium thin. Hamathecium Fig. 87 Setomelanomma holmii (from UPS F-117969 (slide), isotype). b a, b Asci with short pedicels in pseudoparaphyses. c Partial view of ascus. d Branching and septate pseudoparaphyses. a Three-septate lightly pigmented ascospores in ascus. Scale bars: a–e=10 μm of dense, cellular pseudoparaphyses, embedded in mucilage, anastomosing and branching. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate, clavate to broadly cylindrical, with a short, narrowed, furcate pedicel. Ascospores clavate with a rounded apex and acute base, reddish brown, constricted at the septa. Anamorphs reported for genus: Myxocyclus, Steganosporium (Barr 1982b). Literature: Barr 1982b, 1993a; Boise 1985; Corda 1829; Eriksson 1981; Ramaley and Barr 1995; Shoemaker and LeClair 1975; Sivanesan 1984; Tanaka et al. 2005. Type species Splanchnonema pustulatum Corda, in Sturm, Deutschl. Fl., 3 Abt. (Pilze Deutschl.) 2(9), Tome 3: 115 (1829). (Fig. 90) Ascomata 400–600 μm high×550–1000 μm diam., solitary or scattered, immersed in cortex with a pseudostromal covering, with a small ostiole appearing on the host surface, flattened subglobose (Fig. 90a). Peridium 15–25 μm thick, composed of small lightly pigmented thin-walled compressed cells (Fig. 90b). Hamathecium of dense, long cellular pseudoparaphyses 2–3 μm broad, embedded in mucilage, anastomosing and branching. Asci 200–250×30– 45 μm (x ¼ 219:6 38:2mm, n=10), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, clavate to broadly cylindrical, with a short, narrowed, furcate pedicel up to 35 μm long, without conspicuous ocular chamber (Fig. 90c and d). Ascospores 45–53×20–24 μm (x ¼ 48:5 22:3mm, n=10), obliquely uniseriate and partially overlapping to biseriate, clavate with a rounded apex and acute base, reddish brown, 2- septate, apical cell largest, broader than the lower cells, basal cell smallest, constricted at the septa, smoothwalled, surrounded by a regular hyaline gelatinous sheath, 3–6 μm thick (Fig. 90e and f). Anamorph: none reported. Material examined: UK, Avon, nr Bath, Batheaston, on branch of Ulmus, C.E. Broome (L, No. 910.251-352, No. 910.251-371). Notes Morphology A confusing outline of the history of Splanchnonema was provided by Shoemaker and LeClair (1975), which at the time was a valid, but little used name. Eriksson (1981) and Sivanesan (1984) stated (without comment) that the lectotype of Splanchnonema is S. pupula (Fr.) O. Kuntze. However, S. pustulatum is listed as the generic type in the
Fungal Diversity
- Page 1 and 2:
Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225
- Page 3 and 4:
Fungal Diversity Table 1 Major circ
- Page 5 and 6:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 7 and 8:
Fungal Diversity biocontrol agent o
- Page 9 and 10:
Fungal Diversity substrates and man
- Page 11 and 12:
Fungal Diversity 2. To investigate
- Page 13 and 14:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
- Page 15 and 16:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
- Page 17 and 18:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
- Page 19 and 20:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 21 and 22:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 2 Aigialus gr
- Page 23 and 24:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 3 Amniculicol
- Page 25 and 26:
Fungal Diversity Literature: Berkel
- Page 27 and 28:
Fungal Diversity Ascorhombispora L.
- Page 29 and 30:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 31 and 32:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 8 Astrosphaer
- Page 33 and 34:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 9 Asymmetrico
- Page 35 and 36:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
- Page 37 and 38:
Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
- Page 39 and 40:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
- Page 41 and 42:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 14 Bimuria no
- Page 43 and 44:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 15 Bricookea
- Page 45 and 46:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 16 Byssolophi
- Page 47 and 48:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
- Page 49 and 50:
Fungal Diversity the reaction of pe
- Page 51 and 52:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 53 and 54:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 21 Chaetomast
- Page 55 and 56:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 57 and 58:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 23 Cilioplea
- Page 59 and 60:
Fungal Diversity with one or two ve
- Page 61 and 62:
Fungal Diversity Moreau 1953; Munk
- Page 63 and 64:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
- Page 65 and 66:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 28 Dothidotth
- Page 67 and 68:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 29 Dubitatio
- Page 69 and 70:
Fungal Diversity assigned Entodesmi
- Page 71 and 72:
Fungal Diversity fusoid to somewhat
- Page 73 and 74:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 33 Hadrospora
- Page 75 and 76:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 34 Halotthia
- Page 77 and 78:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology H
- Page 79 and 80:
Fungal Diversity some effused Hypox
- Page 81 and 82:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 38 Isthmospor
- Page 83 and 84:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 39 Kalmusia e
- Page 85 and 86:
Fungal Diversity ascospores were br
- Page 87 and 88:
Fungal Diversity furcate pedicel an
- Page 89 and 90:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
- Page 91 and 92:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 93 and 94:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
- Page 95 and 96:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 46 Lewia scro
- Page 97 and 98:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 47 Lichenopyr
- Page 99 and 100:
Fungal Diversity Loculohypoxylon M.
- Page 101 and 102:
Fungal Diversity cells small heavil
- Page 103 and 104:
Fungal Diversity upper place, septa
- Page 105 and 106:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 107 and 108:
Fungal Diversity (CBS 627.86) was i
- Page 109 and 110:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 54 Mamillisph
- Page 111 and 112:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 55 Massarina
- Page 113 and 114: Fungal Diversity phaeria as a synon
- Page 115 and 116: Fungal Diversity 5-8 μm diam., ind
- Page 117 and 118: Fungal Diversity cell wall
- Page 119 and 120: Fungal Diversity Fig. 60 Mixtura sa
- Page 121 and 122: Fungal Diversity Fig. 61 Montagnula
- Page 123 and 124: Fungal Diversity spored, bitunicate
- Page 125 and 126: Fungal Diversity Fig. 64 Murispora
- Page 127 and 128: Fungal Diversity Type species Neoph
- Page 129 and 130: Fungal Diversity brown, 8-septate,
- Page 131 and 132: Fungal Diversity Fig. 68 Ohleria mo
- Page 133 and 134: Fungal Diversity Fig. 69 Ohleriella
- Page 135 and 136: Fungal Diversity Fig. 70 Ophiobolus
- Page 137 and 138: Fungal Diversity Type species Ostro
- Page 139 and 140: Fungal Diversity
- Page 141 and 142: Fungal Diversity (Shoemaker and Bab
- Page 143 and 144: Fungal Diversity ium thin, composed
- Page 145 and 146: Fungal Diversity Fig. 76 Platysporo
- Page 147 and 148: Fungal Diversity Fig. 77 1 Pleomass
- Page 149 and 150: Fungal Diversity Fig. 78 Pleophragm
- Page 151 and 152: Fungal Diversity papillate, ostiola
- Page 153 and 154: Fungal Diversity Williams 1963; Mal
- Page 155 and 156: Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
- Page 157 and 158: Fungal Diversity composed of one ce
- Page 159 and 160: Fungal Diversity Fig. 84 Saccharico
- Page 161 and 162: Fungal Diversity and nearly black a
- Page 163: Fungal Diversity dense, long trabec
- Page 167 and 168: Fungal Diversity
- Page 169 and 170: Fungal Diversity Anamorphs reported
- Page 171 and 172: Fungal Diversity
- Page 173 and 174: Fungal Diversity
- Page 175 and 176: Fungal Diversity Fig. 94 Westerdyke
- Page 177 and 178: Fungal Diversity Fig. 95 Wettsteini
- Page 179 and 180: Fungal Diversity Fig. 96 Wilmia bra
- Page 181 and 182: Fungal Diversity Current name: Astr
- Page 183 and 184: Fungal Diversity spores are actuall
- Page 185 and 186: Fungal Diversity Fig. 100 Sporormie
- Page 187 and 188: Fungal Diversity
- Page 189 and 190: Fungal Diversity Fig. 102 Kriegerie
- Page 191 and 192: Fungal Diversity Phylogenetic study
- Page 193 and 194: Fungal Diversity Fig. 104 Zeuctomor
- Page 195 and 196: Fungal Diversity Fig. 105 Muroia ni
- Page 197 and 198: Fungal Diversity pseudoparenchymato
- Page 199 and 200: Fungal Diversity Eremodothis Arx, K
- Page 201 and 202: Fungal Diversity Type species: Macr
- Page 203 and 204: Fungal Diversity ascospores of Plat
- Page 205 and 206: Fungal Diversity monoceras Alcorn n
- Page 207 and 208: Fungal Diversity tomataceae, Melano
- Page 209 and 210: Fungal Diversity Table 4 (continued
- Page 211 and 212: Fungal Diversity 1987b). Based on a
- Page 213 and 214: Fungal Diversity only do so under v
- Page 215 and 216:
Fungal Diversity Dennis RWG (1968)
- Page 217 and 218:
Fungal Diversity Kirk PM, Cannon PF
- Page 219 and 220:
Fungal Diversity Saccardo PA (1880)
- Page 221:
Fungal Diversity Winter G (1887) As