Fungal Diversity Fig. 80 Pleospora herbarium (from E, Krieger 683). a Immersed ascomata scattering on host surface. b Ascomata in small groups. Note: the surface layer of the host is removed. c Section of an ascoma. Note the peridium cells of textura angularis. d, e. Asci with short pedicels f–j Ascospores. Scale bars: a, b=0.5 mm, c=100 μm, d, e=30 μm, f–j= 20 μm Barr 1987b, 1990a;Boylan1970; Cain 1961; Eriksson 1992; Fuckel 1866; Guarroetal.1981, 1997a, b; KhanandCain 1979a, b; Kruys and Wedin 2009; Lodha 1971; Lorenzo 1994; Luck-Allen and Cain 1975; Maciejowska and
Fungal Diversity Williams 1963; Malloch and Cain 1972; Munk 1957; Narendra and Rao 1976; Rai and Tewari 1963; Sultana and Malik 1980. Type species Preussia funiculata (Preuss) Fuckel, Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk. 23–24: 91 (1870) [1869–70]. (Fig. 81) ≡ Perisporium funiculatum Preuss, Fung. Hoyersw.: no. 145 (1851). Ascomata 240–500 μm diam., cleistothecial, solitary, scattered on substrate, superficial, globose, membraneous, black (Fig. 81a). Peridium thin, composed of thick-walled, poly-angular cells in front view (Fig. 81b). Pseudoparaphyses not observed. Asci 42–65×20–25 μm (x ¼ 55:8 21:8mm, n= 10), (4-)8-spored, bitunicate, broadly clavate, with a long and thin and furcate pedicel, up to 115 μm long, ocular chamber not observed (Fig. 81c and d). Ascospores 30–40×6.3– 7.5 μm (x ¼ 35:6 6:9mm, n=10), 3–6 seriate to uniseriate near the base, cylindrical with rounded ends, brown, with 3 transverse septa, easily breaking into partspores, central cells round in transverse section but rectangular in vertical section, with a germ slit in each cell, 6.5–8.5× 4–7.5 μm broad, apical cells 8.8–10×5–7 μm broad, sheath not observed. Anamorph: none reported. Material examined: USA, Ontario, York Co., Nashville, on old jute sack on ground, 1 Jul. 1960, leg. & det. R.F. Cain (in part Preussia typharum) (TRTC 46985). Notes Morphology Preussia was introduced by Fuckel (1866) to accommodate species having cleistothecioid ascomata, bitunicate asci, multi-septate ascospores with a germ slit in each cell and with a gelatinous sheath, and occurring in soil or plant debris. Preussia, Sporormia and Sporormiella are regarded as closely related genera, which share numerous morphological characters. Sporormia can be distinguished from Preussia by its perithecioid ascomata and cylindrical asci. The only distinguishing morphological character for Preussia from Sporormiella are the cleistothecioid ascomata in Preussia (Barr 2000; Cain 1961), but this has been shown to have little phylogenetic significance (von Arx 1973; Zhang et al. 2009a). Substrate preference has been used to distinguish species of Sporormiella and Preussia, with Sporormiella being restricted to a coprophilous habitat, while Preussia grows in plant debris, wood or soil (von Arx and van der Aa 1987). This proposal was rejected, as P. intermedia (Clum) Cain can be isolated from either soil or dung (Guarro et al. 1997b). In a review of Preussia, Cain (1961) accepted 12 species, and some of them are coprophilous. Subsequently, numerous additional new species have been published (Arenal et al. 2005; Barr 1987b, 1990a; Boylan 1970; Eriksson1992; Guarro et al. 1981, 1997a, b; Khan and Cain 1979a; Lodha1971; Lorenzo 1994; Luck- Allen and Cain 1975; Maciejowska and Williams 1963; Malloch and Cain 1972; Narendra and Rao 1976; Rai and Tewari 1963; Sultana and Malik 1980). Currently, 84 species are listed under Preussia (http://www.mycobank.org/ mycotaxo.aspx, 10/2010) and Kirk et al. (2008) estimates there are 51 species. Phylogenetic study In phylogenetic analysis based on ITS, nLSU, mtSSU and β-tubulin gene fragments, Preussia, Sporormiella and Spororminula clustered together. Thus, Sporormiella together with Spororminula are treated as synonyms of Preussia (Kruys and Wedin 2009). Concluding remarks Preussia sensu lato (including Sporormiella and Spororminula) based on both morphology and molecular data should be accepted pending further research. Quintaria Kohlm. & Volkm.-Kohlm., Bot. Mar. 34: 34 (1991). (<strong>Pleosporales</strong>, genera incertae sedis) Habitat marine, saprobic. Ascomata medium-sized, scattered or loosely gregarious, immersed, mostly subglobose, rarely globose, with a protruding papilla, ostiolate. Peridium thin, 2-layered, coriaceous, thicker near the apex. Hamathecium of dense, filamentous, trabeculate pseudoparaphyses, branching and anastomosing between and above asci. Asci 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindro-clavate, with a short furcate pedicel. Ascospores biseriate, broadly fusoid to fusoid, hyaline, mostly 5- septate, rarely up to 7-septate. Anamorphs reported for genus: none. Literature: Hyde and Goh 1999; Kohlmeyer and Volkmann-Kohlmeyer 1991; Suetrong et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2008b. Type species Quintaria lignatilis (Kohlm.) Kohlm. & Volkm.-Kohlm., Bot. Mar. 34: 35 (1991). (Fig. 82) ≡ Trematosphaeria lignatilis Kohlm., Marine Ecology, [Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica Napoli I] 5(4): 365 (1984). Ascomata 240–500 μm diam., scattered or loosely gregarious, immersed, globose to subglobose, coriaceous, ostiolate, ostiole is encrusted with thick-walled black cells, papilla up to 400 μm long (Fig. 82a). Peridium thin, 20– 30 μm wide, thinner at the base, thicker near the apex, up to
- Page 1 and 2:
Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225
- Page 3 and 4:
Fungal Diversity Table 1 Major circ
- Page 5 and 6:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 7 and 8:
Fungal Diversity biocontrol agent o
- Page 9 and 10:
Fungal Diversity substrates and man
- Page 11 and 12:
Fungal Diversity 2. To investigate
- Page 13 and 14:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
- Page 15 and 16:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
- Page 17 and 18:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
- Page 19 and 20:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 21 and 22:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 2 Aigialus gr
- Page 23 and 24:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 3 Amniculicol
- Page 25 and 26:
Fungal Diversity Literature: Berkel
- Page 27 and 28:
Fungal Diversity Ascorhombispora L.
- Page 29 and 30:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 31 and 32:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 8 Astrosphaer
- Page 33 and 34:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 9 Asymmetrico
- Page 35 and 36:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
- Page 37 and 38:
Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
- Page 39 and 40:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
- Page 41 and 42:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 14 Bimuria no
- Page 43 and 44:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 15 Bricookea
- Page 45 and 46:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 16 Byssolophi
- Page 47 and 48:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
- Page 49 and 50:
Fungal Diversity the reaction of pe
- Page 51 and 52:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 53 and 54:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 21 Chaetomast
- Page 55 and 56:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 57 and 58:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 23 Cilioplea
- Page 59 and 60:
Fungal Diversity with one or two ve
- Page 61 and 62:
Fungal Diversity Moreau 1953; Munk
- Page 63 and 64:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
- Page 65 and 66:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 28 Dothidotth
- Page 67 and 68:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 29 Dubitatio
- Page 69 and 70:
Fungal Diversity assigned Entodesmi
- Page 71 and 72:
Fungal Diversity fusoid to somewhat
- Page 73 and 74:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 33 Hadrospora
- Page 75 and 76:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 34 Halotthia
- Page 77 and 78:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology H
- Page 79 and 80:
Fungal Diversity some effused Hypox
- Page 81 and 82:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 38 Isthmospor
- Page 83 and 84:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 39 Kalmusia e
- Page 85 and 86:
Fungal Diversity ascospores were br
- Page 87 and 88:
Fungal Diversity furcate pedicel an
- Page 89 and 90:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
- Page 91 and 92:
Fungal Diversity
- Page 93 and 94:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
- Page 95 and 96:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 46 Lewia scro
- Page 97 and 98:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 47 Lichenopyr
- Page 99 and 100:
Fungal Diversity Loculohypoxylon M.
- Page 101 and 102: Fungal Diversity cells small heavil
- Page 103 and 104: Fungal Diversity upper place, septa
- Page 105 and 106: Fungal Diversity
- Page 107 and 108: Fungal Diversity (CBS 627.86) was i
- Page 109 and 110: Fungal Diversity Fig. 54 Mamillisph
- Page 111 and 112: Fungal Diversity Fig. 55 Massarina
- Page 113 and 114: Fungal Diversity phaeria as a synon
- Page 115 and 116: Fungal Diversity 5-8 μm diam., ind
- Page 117 and 118: Fungal Diversity cell wall
- Page 119 and 120: Fungal Diversity Fig. 60 Mixtura sa
- Page 121 and 122: Fungal Diversity Fig. 61 Montagnula
- Page 123 and 124: Fungal Diversity spored, bitunicate
- Page 125 and 126: Fungal Diversity Fig. 64 Murispora
- Page 127 and 128: Fungal Diversity Type species Neoph
- Page 129 and 130: Fungal Diversity brown, 8-septate,
- Page 131 and 132: Fungal Diversity Fig. 68 Ohleria mo
- Page 133 and 134: Fungal Diversity Fig. 69 Ohleriella
- Page 135 and 136: Fungal Diversity Fig. 70 Ophiobolus
- Page 137 and 138: Fungal Diversity Type species Ostro
- Page 139 and 140: Fungal Diversity
- Page 141 and 142: Fungal Diversity (Shoemaker and Bab
- Page 143 and 144: Fungal Diversity ium thin, composed
- Page 145 and 146: Fungal Diversity Fig. 76 Platysporo
- Page 147 and 148: Fungal Diversity Fig. 77 1 Pleomass
- Page 149 and 150: Fungal Diversity Fig. 78 Pleophragm
- Page 151: Fungal Diversity papillate, ostiola
- Page 155 and 156: Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
- Page 157 and 158: Fungal Diversity composed of one ce
- Page 159 and 160: Fungal Diversity Fig. 84 Saccharico
- Page 161 and 162: Fungal Diversity and nearly black a
- Page 163 and 164: Fungal Diversity dense, long trabec
- Page 165 and 166: Fungal Diversity
- Page 167 and 168: Fungal Diversity
- Page 169 and 170: Fungal Diversity Anamorphs reported
- Page 171 and 172: Fungal Diversity
- Page 173 and 174: Fungal Diversity
- Page 175 and 176: Fungal Diversity Fig. 94 Westerdyke
- Page 177 and 178: Fungal Diversity Fig. 95 Wettsteini
- Page 179 and 180: Fungal Diversity Fig. 96 Wilmia bra
- Page 181 and 182: Fungal Diversity Current name: Astr
- Page 183 and 184: Fungal Diversity spores are actuall
- Page 185 and 186: Fungal Diversity Fig. 100 Sporormie
- Page 187 and 188: Fungal Diversity
- Page 189 and 190: Fungal Diversity Fig. 102 Kriegerie
- Page 191 and 192: Fungal Diversity Phylogenetic study
- Page 193 and 194: Fungal Diversity Fig. 104 Zeuctomor
- Page 195 and 196: Fungal Diversity Fig. 105 Muroia ni
- Page 197 and 198: Fungal Diversity pseudoparenchymato
- Page 199 and 200: Fungal Diversity Eremodothis Arx, K
- Page 201 and 202: Fungal Diversity Type species: Macr
- Page 203 and 204:
Fungal Diversity ascospores of Plat
- Page 205 and 206:
Fungal Diversity monoceras Alcorn n
- Page 207 and 208:
Fungal Diversity tomataceae, Melano
- Page 209 and 210:
Fungal Diversity Table 4 (continued
- Page 211 and 212:
Fungal Diversity 1987b). Based on a
- Page 213 and 214:
Fungal Diversity only do so under v
- Page 215 and 216:
Fungal Diversity Dennis RWG (1968)
- Page 217 and 218:
Fungal Diversity Kirk PM, Cannon PF
- Page 219 and 220:
Fungal Diversity Saccardo PA (1880)
- Page 221:
Fungal Diversity Winter G (1887) As