Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW
Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW
Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fungal Diversity<br />
Table 1 Major circumscription changes of <strong>Pleosporales</strong> from 1955 to 2011<br />
References<br />
Luttrell 1955<br />
Müller and von Arx 1962<br />
Luttrell 1973<br />
Barr 1979a<br />
Barr 1987b<br />
Kirk et al. 2001, 2008<br />
Boehm et al. 2009a, b; Mugambi<br />
and Huhndorf 2009b; Schoch et<br />
al. 2009; Shearer et al. 2009;<br />
Suetrong et al. 2009; Tanaka et<br />
al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2009a<br />
Circumscriptions distinguishing <strong>Pleosporales</strong> from other orders of Dothideomycetes<br />
Pleospora-type centrum development.<br />
Ascomata perithecoid, with rounded or slit-like ostiole; asci produced within a locule, arranged regularly<br />
in a single layer or irregularly scattered, surrounded with filiform pseudoparaphyses, cylindrical,<br />
ellipsoidal or sac-like.<br />
Ascocarps perithecioid, immersed, erumpent to superficial on various substrates, asci ovoid to mostly<br />
clavate or cylindrical, interspersed with pseudoparaphyses (sometimes form an epithecium) in mostly<br />
medium- to large-sized locules.<br />
Saprobic, parasitic, lichenized or hypersaprobic. Ascomata perithecioid, rarely cleistothecioid or<br />
hysterothecioid, peridium pseudoparenchymatous, pseudoparaphyses cellular, narrow or broad,<br />
deliquescing early at times, not forming an epithecium, asci oblong, clavate or cylindrical, interspersed<br />
with pseudoparaphyses, ascospores mostly asymmetric.<br />
Saprobic, biotrophic or hemibiotrophic. Ascomata globose, subglobose or conical, asci bitunicate, oblong,<br />
clavate or cylindrical, cellular pseudoparaphyses, ascospores hyaline or pigmented, asymmetric or<br />
symmetric, with or without septa.<br />
Ascomata perithecioid or rarely cleistothecioid, sometimes clypeate, mostly globose, thick-walled,<br />
immersed or erumpent, black, sometimes setose, peridium composed of pseudoparenchymatous cells,<br />
pseudoparaphyses trabeculate or cellular, asci cylindrical, fissitunicate, with a well-developed ocular<br />
chamber, rarely with a poorly defined ring (J-), ascospores hyaline to brown, septate, thin or thickwalled,<br />
sometimes muriform, usually with sheath, anamorphs hyphomycetous or coelomycetous.<br />
Hemibiotrophic, saprobic, hypersaprobic, or lichenized. Habitats in freshwater, marine or terrestrial<br />
environment. Ascomata perithecioid, rarely cleistothecioid, immersed, erumpent to superficial, globose<br />
to subglobose, or lenticular to irregular, with or without conspicuous papilla or ostioles. Ostioles with or<br />
without periphyses. Peridium usually composed of a few layers of cells with various shapes and<br />
structures. Hamathecium persistent, filamentous, very rarely decomposing. Asci bitunicate, fissitunicate,<br />
cylindrical, clavate to obclavate, with or without pedicel. Ascospores hyaline or pigmented, ellipsoidal,<br />
broadly to narrowly fusoid or filiform, mostly septate.<br />
Morpho-characters used in taxonomy of <strong>Pleosporales</strong><br />
Sexual characters<br />
According to the Linnean classification system, reproductive<br />
structures are the most important criteria in plant<br />
taxonomy, and this proposal is widely applied in fungal<br />
taxonomy (Gäumann 1952). In the classification of Dothideomycetes,<br />
reproductive characters such as the uni- or<br />
multilocular nature and shape of ascomata, presence and<br />
shape of ostioles/papillae, shape and apical structures of<br />
asci and shape, pigmentation and septation of ascospores<br />
play important roles at different ranks (Clements and Shear<br />
1931; Luttrell 1951, 1955, 1973). Besides the common<br />
morphological characters possessed by Dothideomycetes<br />
(bitunicate and fissitunicate asci as well as the perithecioidlike<br />
ascostromata), most pleosporalean fungi also have<br />
pseudoparaphyses among their well-arranged asci (Zhang et<br />
al. 2009a). Currently, classification of <strong>Pleosporales</strong> at the<br />
family level focuses mostly on morphological characters of<br />
ascomata (such as size, shape of ostiole or papilla), presence<br />
or absence of periphyses, characters of centrum (such as asci,<br />
pseudoparaphyses and ascospores) as well as on lifestyle or<br />
habitat (Barr 1990a; Shearer et al. 2009; Suetrong et al.<br />
2009; Tanaka et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2009a), whilst relying<br />
extensively on DNA sequence comparisons.<br />
Ascomata<br />
Most species of <strong>Pleosporales</strong> have uniloculate ascomata.<br />
The presence (or absence) and forms of papilla and ostiole<br />
are the pitoval character of ascomata, which serve as<br />
important characteristics in generic or higher rank classification<br />
(Clements and Shear 1931). The vertically flattened papilla has<br />
recently been shown as an effective criterion for familial level<br />
classification, e.g. in the Amniculicolaceae and the Lophiostomataceae<br />
(Zhang et al. 2009a). Papillae and ostioles are<br />
present in most species of <strong>Pleosporales</strong>, except in the<br />
Diademaceae and Sporormiaceae. Members of Diademaceae<br />
have apothecial ascomata, and some genera of Sporormiaceae<br />
have cleistothecioid ascomata. Another coprophilous pleosporalean<br />
family, Delitschiaceae, can be distinguished from<br />
Sporormiaceae by the presence of periphysate ostioles.<br />
Pseudoparaphyses<br />
Presence of pseudoparaphyses is a characteristic of<br />
<strong>Pleosporales</strong> (Kirk et al. 2008; Liew et al. 2000). Although<br />
pseudoparaphyses may be deliquescing in some families<br />
when the ascomata mature (e.g. in Didymellaceae), they are<br />
persistent in most of other pleosporalean members. According<br />
to the thickness, with or without branching and density<br />
of septa, pseudoparaphyses were roughly divided into two<br />
types: trabeculate and cellular, and their taxonomic significance<br />
need to be re-evaluated (Liew et al. 2000).