Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fungal Diversity obovate, thick-walled, bitunicate and evanescent, and ascospores are globose, simple, dark brown to black (based on the type specimen of R. insignis) (Hawksworth and Booth 1974). Based on these characters, R. insignis was treated as a species of Zopfia (as Z. insignis (Petr.) D. Hawksw. & C. Booth). Rechingeriella has been assigned to Botryosphaeriaceae by von Arx and Müller (1975). Further study should be conducted on the type specimen of R. insignis in order to clarify its taxonomic status and fresh collections are needed for epitypification. Rhytidiella Zalasky, Can. J. Bot. 46: 1383 (1968). Type species: Rhytidiella moriformis Zalasky, Can. J. Bot. 46: 1383 (1968). Rhytidiella was introduced based on R. moriformis, which causes perennial rough-bark of Populus balsamifera (Zalasky 1968), and produces macroconidia belonging to Phaeoseptoria. Subsequently, three more species were introduced, viz. R. baranyayi A. Funk & Zalasky, R. hebes P.R. Johnst. and R. beloniza (Stirt.) M.B. Aguirre (Aguirre- Hudson 1991; Funk and Zalasky 1975;Johnston2007), Both R. baranyayi and R. hebes seem closely related to R. moriformis on both biology and morphology (Funk and Zalasky 1975;Johnston2007), but R. beloniza is saprobic on Cordyline australis bark (Aguirre-Hudson 1991). Rhytidiella was temporarily assigned to Cucurbitariaceae (Barr 1987b). Richonia Boud., Revue mycol., Toulouse 7: 224 (1885). Type species: Richonia variospora Boud., Revue mycol., Toulouse 7: 265 (1885). Richonia is characterized by its 1-septate, relatively large ascospores which are broadly rounded at both ends, and have a thick ornamented undulating sheath giving an irregularly ridged appearance to mature spores (Hawksworth 1979). Richonia variospora has been isolated from several localities in France, but it is rare (Hawksworth 1979). Richonia was assigned under Zopfiaceae (von Arx and Müller 1975; Hawksworth1979), and there are presently no better suggestions for its familial placement. The taxon needs recollecting and epitypifying. Rimora Kohlm., Volkm.-Kohlm., Suetrong, Sakay. & E.B. G. Jones, Stud. Mycol. 64: 166 (2009). Type species: Rimora mangrovei (Kohlm. & Vittal) Kohlm., Volkm.-Kohlm., Suetrong, Sakay. & E.B.G. Jones, Stud. Mycol. 64: 166 (2009). ≡ Lophiostoma mangrovei Kohlm. & Vittal [as ‘mangrovis’], Mycologia 78: 487 (1986). Rimora was introduced based on a marine fungus R. mangrovei (syn. Lophiostoma mangrovei), and is characterized by its erumpent ascomata with elongated flat tops, cellular pseudoparaphyses and cylindrical asci (Suetrong et al. 2009). Ascospores are fusoid, hyaline, 3-septate and surrounded with an evanescent sheath (Kohlmeyer and Vittal 1986; Suetrong et al. 2009). Rimora forms a robust clade with other marine fungi, such as species of Aigialus and Ascocratera, and a new family, Aigialaceae was introduced to accommodate them (Suetrong et al. 2009). Roussoellopsis I. Hino & Katum., J. Jap. Bot. 40: 86 (1965). Type species: Roussoellopsis japonica (I. Hino & Katum.) I. Hino & Katum., J. Jap. Bot. 40: 86 (1965). ≡ Didymosphaeria japonica I. Hino & Katum., Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University 5: 229 (1954). Roussoellopsis was introduced by Hino and Katumoto (1965) based on three bambusicolous fungal species, i.e. R. japonica, R. macrospora (I. Hino & Katum.) I. Hino & Katum. and R. tosaensis (I. Hino & Katum.) I. Hino & Katum. These three species have immersed and gregarious ascomata, clavate to cylindro-clavate asci, numerous and filliform pseudoparaphyses, and 1-septate, asymmetrical ascospores (Hino and Katumoto 1965). All these characters point Roussoellopsis to <strong>Pleosporales</strong>, but its familial placement cannot be determined. Saccothecium Fr., Fl. Scan.: 349 (1836). Type species: Saccothecium sepincola (Fr.) Fr. [as ‘saepincola’], Summa veg. Scand., Section Post. (Stockholm): 398 (1849). ≡ Sphaeria sepincola Fr. [as ‘saepincola’], Observ. mycol. (Havniae) 1: 181 (1815). Saccothecium is characterized by its subglobose, immersed to erumpent ascomata, absence of pseudoparaphyses and hyaline, muriform to phragmosporous ascospores. It has been assigned to the Dothioraceae (Barr 1987b; Müllerand von Arx 1950). Molecular phylogenetic analysis indicated that a strain named S. sepincola nested within Didymellaceae (Schoch et al. 2009; Plate 1). The generic type needs recollecting, redescribing and epitypifying. Setosphaeria K.J. Leonard & Suggs, Mycologia 66: 294 (1974). Type species: Setosphaeria turcica (Luttr.) K.J. Leonard & Suggs, Mycologia 66: 295 (1974). ≡ Trichometasphaeria turcica Luttr., Phytopathology 48: 282 (1958). Setosphaeria was segregated from Keissleriella on the basis of lacking a clypeus, lysigenous development of the ostiole, occurrence of setae on the perithecial wall, the absence of periphyses in the ostiole, and the hyphomycetous conidial states, and four species were included, i.e. S. prolata, S. holmii, S. pedicellata (R.R. Nelson) K.J. Leonard & Suggs and S. turcica (Leonard and Suggs 1974). Currently, nine species are included in Setosphaeria (http://www.mycobank.org, Jan/2011). Setosphaeria
Fungal Diversity monoceras Alcorn nested within Pleosporaceae based on multigene phylogenetic analysis (Schoch et al. 2009; Plate 1). Syncarpella Theiss. & Syd., Annls mycol. 13: 631 (1915). Type species: Syncarpella tumefaciens (Ellis & Harkn.) Theiss. & Syd., Annls mycol. 13(5/6): 633 (1915). ≡ Sphaeria tumefaciens Ellis & Harkn., J. Mycol. 2: 41 (1886). Syncarpella was introduced by Theissen and Sydow (1915) as a genus of Montagnellaceae within Dothideales. A detailed description of S. tumefaciens can be seen in Barr and Boise (1989). Syncarpella was considered closely related to Leptosphaeria, and was treated as a synonym (Clements and Shear 1931). Syncarpella is characterized by its abundant globose, ovoid to turbinate ascomata with minute papillae which are seated on a common basal stroma and which are erumpent through fissures in the host tissues (Barr and Boise 1989). The peridium is thicker at the base, pseudoparaphyses are cellular, and asci are bitunicate, clavate to oblong with a furcate pedicel. Ascospores are pale brown to brown, oblong to narrowly obovoid, ends obtuse, transversely septate, smooth-walled. All these characters fit Cucurbitariaceae, where Barr and Boise (1989) transferred Syncarpella. Teichospora Fuckel, Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk. 23–24: 160 (1870) [1869–70]. Type species: Teichospora trabicola Fuckel, Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk. 23–24: 161 (1870) [1869–70]. Teichospora was introduced by Fuckel (1870), and was typified by T. trabicola, with four more species included, i.e. T. brevirostris Fuckel, T. dura Fuckel, T. morthieri Fuckel and T. obducens (Schumach.) Fuckel. Only T. brevirostris and T. trabicola were kept in Teichospora (Barr 1987b). After studying the type specimens, Barr (1987b) indicated that Teichospora was different from Strickeria with Teichospora belonging to <strong>Pleosporales</strong>, and Strickeria closely related to Melanomma (Melanommatales). Currently, more than 250 names are included within Teichospora (http://www.mycobank.org, Jan/2011), but almost no molecular phylogenetic study has been conductedonthisgenus. Testudina Bizz., Atti Inst. Veneto Sci. lett., ed Arti, Sér. 6 3: 303 (1885). Type species: Testudina terrestris Bizz., Fungi venet. nov. vel. Crit. 3: 303 (1885). Testudina terrestris is characterized by its reticulately ridged ascospores, which readily distinguish it from other genera of Zopfiaceae (Hawksworth 1979). The species is usually associated with other fungi, or on the wood of Abies? and Pinus or on the fallen leaves of Taxus in Europe (Hawksworth and Booth 1974; Hawksworth1979). Tetraplosphaeria Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, Stud. Mycol. 64: 177 (2009). Type species: Tetraplosphaeria sasicola Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, Stud. Mycol. 64: 180 (2009). Tetraplosphaeria was introduced by Tanaka et al. (2009) to accommodate bambusicolous fungi with immersed to erumpent, globose to subglobose and smaller (mostly< 300 μm) ascomata. The peridium is thin, and is composed of thin-walled cells of textura angularis. The pseudoparaphyses are cellular, and asci are fissitunicate, 8-spored, cylindrical to clavate with short pedicels. Ascospores are narrowly fusoid, hyaline and surrounded with a sheath. Species of Tetraplosphaeria have Tetraploa sensu stricto anamorphic stage, which is quite unique in Tetraplosphaeriaceae (Tanaka et al. 2009). Tingoldiago K. Hirayama & Kaz. Tanaka, Mycologia 102: 740 (2010). Type species: Tingoldiago graminicola K. Hirayama & Kaz. Tanaka, Mycologia 102(3): 740 (2010). Tingoldiago is a genus of freshwater ascomycetes characterized by flattened, globose, immersed to erumpent ascomata, and numerous cellular pseudoparaphyses (Hirayama et al. 2010). Asci are fissitunicate and cylindrical, and ascospores are 1-septate, which usually turn 3-septate and pale brown when old, usually with a sheath (Hirayama et al. 2010). Based on both morphology and multigene phylogenetic analysis, Tingoldiago should be treated as a synonym of Lentithecium (Shearer et al. 2009a; Zhang et al. 2009a). Tremateia Kohlm., Volkm.-Kohlm. & O.E. Erikss., Bot. Mar. 38: 165 (1995). Type species: Tremateia halophila Kohlm., Volkm.-Kohlm. & O.E. Erikss., Bot. Mar. 38: 166 (1995). Tremateia was introduced as a facultative marine genus which is characterized by depressed globose, immersed ascomata, numerous and cellular pseudoparaphyses, fissitunicate and clavate asci, ellipsoid muriform ascospores, and a Phoma-like anamorph (Kohlmeyer et al. 1995). These characters point Tremateia to Pleosporaceae (Kohlmeyer et al. 1995). DNA sequence based phylogenies placed T. halophila as sister to Bimuria novae-zelandiae in Montagnulaceae (Schoch et al. 2009; Suetrong et al. 2009). Triplosphaeria Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, Stud. Mycol. 64: 186 (2009). Type species: Triplosphaeria maxima Kaz. Tanaka & K. Hirayama, Stud. Mycol. 64: 188 (2009). Triplosphaeria was introduced as a bambusicolous genus characterized by immersed ascomata, numerous cellular
Page 1 and 2:
Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225
Page 3 and 4:
Fungal Diversity Table 1 Major circ
Page 5 and 6:
Fungal Diversity
Page 7 and 8:
Fungal Diversity biocontrol agent o
Page 9 and 10:
Fungal Diversity substrates and man
Page 11 and 12:
Fungal Diversity 2. To investigate
Page 13 and 14:
Fungal Diversity Table 3 (continued
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Fungal Diversity
Page 21 and 22:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 2 Aigialus gr
Page 23 and 24:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 3 Amniculicol
Page 25 and 26:
Fungal Diversity Literature: Berkel
Page 27 and 28:
Fungal Diversity Ascorhombispora L.
Page 29 and 30:
Fungal Diversity
Page 31 and 32:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 8 Astrosphaer
Page 33 and 34:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 9 Asymmetrico
Page 35 and 36:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
Page 37 and 38:
Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
Page 39 and 40:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
Page 41 and 42:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 14 Bimuria no
Page 43 and 44:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 15 Bricookea
Page 45 and 46:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 16 Byssolophi
Page 47 and 48:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology B
Page 49 and 50:
Fungal Diversity the reaction of pe
Page 51 and 52:
Fungal Diversity
Page 53 and 54:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 21 Chaetomast
Page 55 and 56:
Fungal Diversity
Page 57 and 58:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 23 Cilioplea
Page 59 and 60:
Fungal Diversity with one or two ve
Page 61 and 62:
Fungal Diversity Moreau 1953; Munk
Page 63 and 64:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
Page 65 and 66:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 28 Dothidotth
Page 67 and 68:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 29 Dubitatio
Page 69 and 70:
Fungal Diversity assigned Entodesmi
Page 71 and 72:
Fungal Diversity fusoid to somewhat
Page 73 and 74:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 33 Hadrospora
Page 75 and 76:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 34 Halotthia
Page 77 and 78:
Fungal Diversity Notes Morphology H
Page 79 and 80:
Fungal Diversity some effused Hypox
Page 81 and 82:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 38 Isthmospor
Page 83 and 84:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 39 Kalmusia e
Page 85 and 86:
Fungal Diversity ascospores were br
Page 87 and 88:
Fungal Diversity furcate pedicel an
Page 89 and 90:
Fungal Diversity Anamorph: none rep
Page 91 and 92:
Fungal Diversity
Page 93 and 94:
Fungal Diversity Material examined:
Page 95 and 96:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 46 Lewia scro
Page 97 and 98:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 47 Lichenopyr
Page 99 and 100:
Fungal Diversity Loculohypoxylon M.
Page 101 and 102:
Fungal Diversity cells small heavil
Page 103 and 104:
Fungal Diversity upper place, septa
Page 105 and 106:
Fungal Diversity
Page 107 and 108:
Fungal Diversity (CBS 627.86) was i
Page 109 and 110:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 54 Mamillisph
Page 111 and 112:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 55 Massarina
Page 113 and 114:
Fungal Diversity phaeria as a synon
Page 115 and 116:
Fungal Diversity 5-8 μm diam., ind
Page 117 and 118:
Fungal Diversity cell wall
Page 119 and 120:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 60 Mixtura sa
Page 121 and 122:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 61 Montagnula
Page 123 and 124:
Fungal Diversity spored, bitunicate
Page 125 and 126:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 64 Murispora
Page 127 and 128:
Fungal Diversity Type species Neoph
Page 129 and 130:
Fungal Diversity brown, 8-septate,
Page 131 and 132:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 68 Ohleria mo
Page 133 and 134:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 69 Ohleriella
Page 135 and 136:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 70 Ophiobolus
Page 137 and 138:
Fungal Diversity Type species Ostro
Page 139 and 140:
Fungal Diversity
Page 141 and 142:
Fungal Diversity (Shoemaker and Bab
Page 143 and 144:
Fungal Diversity ium thin, composed
Page 145 and 146:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 76 Platysporo
Page 147 and 148:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 77 1 Pleomass
Page 149 and 150:
Fungal Diversity Fig. 78 Pleophragm
Page 151 and 152:
Fungal Diversity papillate, ostiola
Page 153 and 154: Fungal Diversity Williams 1963; Mal
Page 155 and 156: Fungal Diversity Generic descriptio
Page 157 and 158: Fungal Diversity composed of one ce
Page 159 and 160: Fungal Diversity Fig. 84 Saccharico
Page 161 and 162: Fungal Diversity and nearly black a
Page 163 and 164: Fungal Diversity dense, long trabec
Page 165 and 166: Fungal Diversity
Page 169 and 170: Fungal Diversity Anamorphs reported
Page 175 and 176: Fungal Diversity Fig. 94 Westerdyke
Page 177 and 178: Fungal Diversity Fig. 95 Wettsteini
Page 179 and 180: Fungal Diversity Fig. 96 Wilmia bra
Page 181 and 182: Fungal Diversity Current name: Astr
Page 183 and 184: Fungal Diversity spores are actuall
Page 185 and 186: Fungal Diversity Fig. 100 Sporormie
Page 189 and 190: Fungal Diversity Fig. 102 Kriegerie
Page 191 and 192: Fungal Diversity Phylogenetic study
Page 193 and 194: Fungal Diversity Fig. 104 Zeuctomor
Page 195 and 196: Fungal Diversity Fig. 105 Muroia ni
Page 197 and 198: Fungal Diversity pseudoparenchymato
Page 199 and 200: Fungal Diversity Eremodothis Arx, K
Page 201 and 202: Fungal Diversity Type species: Macr
Page 203: Fungal Diversity ascospores of Plat
Page 207 and 208: Fungal Diversity tomataceae, Melano
Page 209 and 210: Fungal Diversity Table 4 (continued
Page 211 and 212: Fungal Diversity 1987b). Based on a
Page 213 and 214: Fungal Diversity only do so under v
Page 215 and 216: Fungal Diversity Dennis RWG (1968)
Page 217 and 218: Fungal Diversity Kirk PM, Cannon PF
Page 219 and 220: Fungal Diversity Saccardo PA (1880)
Page 221: Fungal Diversity Winter G (1887) As
show all

Pleosporales - CBS - KNAW

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?