Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
94<br />
samantha king<br />
to encourage <strong>the</strong> study of <strong>the</strong> “growing number of cancer veterans.”<br />
In 1998, <strong>the</strong> American Cancer Society and <strong>the</strong> Komen Foundation<br />
followed <strong>the</strong>ir lead with <strong>the</strong> launch of similar efforts.<br />
This short history offers an indication of <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong><br />
empowered patient—<strong>the</strong> activist-expert, <strong>the</strong> survivor—has become<br />
institutionalized and incorporated into <strong>the</strong> fabric of <strong>the</strong> cancer establishment.<br />
This is nowhere more clear than in <strong>the</strong> case of breast cancer.<br />
The movement remains extraordinarily diverse, with support groups,<br />
grassroots collectives, charities, national lobbying organizations, corporations,<br />
and federal agencies working both in alliance and independently<br />
to shape <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> disease. But breast cancer groups that embrace<br />
patient-empowerment as a way to mobilize critical engagement with<br />
biomedical research, anger at governmental inaction, and resistance<br />
to social discrimination—Breast Cancer Action in San Francisco, for<br />
instance, or <strong>the</strong> Women’s Community Cancer Project in Cambridge,<br />
Massachusetts—are marginalized in mainstream discourse on <strong>the</strong><br />
disease. Instead, and as <strong>the</strong> two case studies that follow show, <strong>the</strong> version<br />
of <strong>the</strong> breast cancer survivor that prevails in <strong>the</strong> national imaginary<br />
is used to mobilize fund-raising for high-stakes, cure-driven scientifi c<br />
research on <strong>the</strong> disease; to validate—usually without questioning—scientifi<br />
c authority and expertise; and to market an ever-increasing number<br />
of goods to consumers eager to play <strong>the</strong>ir part in <strong>the</strong> fi ght against <strong>the</strong><br />
disease. The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation’s Race for <strong>the</strong><br />
Cure has been a central actor in <strong>the</strong> development of this particular<br />
confi guration of <strong>the</strong> breast cancer survivor—a confi guration that relies<br />
on and in turn reproduces an unbridled optimism about life with and<br />
beyond <strong>the</strong> disease and, concurrently, an obstinate refusal to question<br />
<strong>the</strong> status quo.<br />
The Race for <strong>the</strong> Cure<br />
Seven hundred women took part in <strong>the</strong> fi rst Susan G. Komen Breast<br />
Cancer Foundation Race for <strong>the</strong> Cure in Dallas, Texas, in October 1983. 5<br />
By 1999 <strong>the</strong> race was <strong>the</strong> nation’s largest 5K series with events in 99<br />
cities across <strong>the</strong> United States. Between 1988 and 1999, participation<br />
in <strong>the</strong> series increased tenfold to nearly 600,000, grew by 44% between<br />
1997 and 1998 alone, and reached 1.4 million in 2005. The National<br />
Race for <strong>the</strong> Cure, held in Washington, DC, each June, is now <strong>the</strong> biggest<br />
5K run in <strong>the</strong> world. In addition to <strong>the</strong> numbers who participate, <strong>the</strong><br />
appeal of <strong>the</strong> Race for <strong>the</strong> Cure is apparent in its capacity to attract<br />
high-profi le corporate sponsors, as well as <strong>the</strong> support and attendance<br />
of politicians and celebrities at events across <strong>the</strong> United States. 6