Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“It’s Down To You” 31<br />
particular practices of self-decipherment (you have <strong>the</strong> power within),<br />
self-reliance, self-management, and self-discipline that <strong>the</strong>y argue<br />
produce particular kinds of “biographical biologies” (p. 126) and<br />
fantasies of a “pan-humanity” (p. 125).<br />
Self-health narratives and practices are <strong>the</strong>refore linked to <strong>the</strong> kinds<br />
of narratives of progress and redemption authorized within scientifi c<br />
discourse. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> schizophrenic-overload Fredric Jameson<br />
viewed as salient to postmodern subjectivities, Franklin et al. (2000)<br />
explore how those metaphors and narratives that structure science as <strong>the</strong><br />
liberator of humanity have increasingly become individualized and lived<br />
as part of individual’s own practices of <strong>the</strong> self. 4 Their focus on “modes of<br />
subjective commitment” (p. 97) and <strong>the</strong> forms of embodied subjectivity,<br />
fantasy, and desire created through <strong>the</strong> cultural discourses and narratives<br />
that tend to characterize global cultures intersects with <strong>the</strong> concerns of<br />
critical psychology. As a discipline, critical psychology focuses on <strong>the</strong><br />
cultural and scientifi c production of subjectivity and identity, and pays<br />
particular attention to how cultural narratives and practices shape and<br />
construct embodied experiences (Blackman, 2001). As we have seen in<br />
my discussion of magazine culture, <strong>the</strong>re is a particular concern with<br />
how individuals live and embody <strong>the</strong> contradictory ways in which <strong>the</strong>y<br />
are positioned as individuals (cf. Walkerdine et al., 2001). However,<br />
although <strong>the</strong>re is a concern with embodiment and modes of subjective<br />
commitment within Franklin et al.’s <strong>the</strong>sis on global cultures, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
much less attention in this work to <strong>the</strong> translation of <strong>the</strong>se injunctions<br />
across race, class, sexuality, and gender. The analytic attention is mainly<br />
focused on consumer markets and <strong>the</strong> kinds of systematization and<br />
signifi cations, which underpin <strong>the</strong> strategies of global brands such as<br />
Benetton and The <strong>Body</strong> Shop.<br />
Taking Care of Yourself<br />
Franklin et al. (2000) suggest that <strong>the</strong>se kinds of fantasies of self-control<br />
and practices of body management enable individuals to manage <strong>the</strong><br />
increasing global risks that science can no longer guarantee safety and<br />
salvation from. The fantasy of science as protector and guardian has<br />
mutated and converged with a proliferation of narratives and practices<br />
of self-management that construct individuals as <strong>the</strong> agents of <strong>the</strong>ir own<br />
change, transformation, and redemption. Stacey (1997) argues that <strong>the</strong>se<br />
kinds of narratives have a potency and cultural purchase because of<br />
our familiarity with <strong>the</strong>ir structures through fi lmic and cultural narratives.<br />
Narratives such as <strong>the</strong> action movie or melodrama genre are<br />
organized through codes and devices, which fi ctionalize <strong>the</strong> storytelling