30.12.2012 Views

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Feminization of Labor<br />

Productive Bodies 139<br />

Jessica Weiss (2000) explains that <strong>the</strong> decrease in <strong>the</strong> labor force<br />

preceding World War II is <strong>the</strong> condition that permitted older and<br />

married women to enter into wage labor. The low birthrates during<br />

<strong>the</strong> Great Depression resulted in a decreased labor supply in <strong>the</strong> 1950s.<br />

The labor force was fur<strong>the</strong>r affected as women began to marry earlier<br />

and left paid labor for unpaid labor. In response, employers, in need of<br />

workers, relaxed <strong>the</strong>ir policy of hiring single women only and began to<br />

employ married women. Employers were willing to make part-time work<br />

available, accommodating married women with school-aged children.<br />

As women entered <strong>the</strong> paid labor force and as <strong>the</strong> need for laborers<br />

increased after World War II, hiring requirements altered to include<br />

<strong>the</strong> female worker and capital accommodated <strong>the</strong> lifestyles of married<br />

women to benefit <strong>the</strong> ends of production.<br />

Capitalism accommodated life to meet <strong>the</strong> needs of production<br />

by subsuming human relations into its fold. In this sense, employers<br />

“cooperated” with <strong>the</strong> lives of married women in <strong>the</strong> form of part-time<br />

labor, allowing women to continue <strong>the</strong>ir social roles as mo<strong>the</strong>r and<br />

spouse. “In every moment of <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> capitalist mode<br />

of production,” argues Negri (1992), “capital has always proposed <strong>the</strong><br />

form of cooperation” (p. 154). However to produce productive labor,<br />

Negri continues, “this form had to be functional with <strong>the</strong> form of<br />

exploitation” (p. 154). Hiring married women as part-time workers<br />

exploited <strong>the</strong>ir labor with substandard pay and an absence of benefits.<br />

Corporations cooperated with <strong>the</strong> existing social relations of women’s<br />

primary roles as mo<strong>the</strong>rs and wives by offering <strong>the</strong> flexibility of parttime<br />

labor to accommodate labor needs while maintaining traditional<br />

forms of exploitation. Capital does not only respond to collective social<br />

movements; but more important, capital is always responding to <strong>the</strong><br />

real social experiences of living labor.<br />

Jane Jenson, Elisabeth Hagen, and Ceallaigh Reddy (1988) explain<br />

that as <strong>the</strong> services sector increased in economic importance along with<br />

<strong>the</strong> availability of part-time work, more employment opportunities were<br />

available for women and many middle-class married women became<br />

active participants in wage labor (pp. 5–6). Women’s participation in<br />

<strong>the</strong> labor force and <strong>the</strong>ir relation to work was different from that of <strong>the</strong><br />

traditional male worker. Women entered into and out of <strong>the</strong> paid labor<br />

force throughout <strong>the</strong>ir life cycle because most middle-class women quit<br />

work when <strong>the</strong>y wed and reentered <strong>the</strong> workforce when <strong>the</strong>ir children<br />

were school-age or when <strong>the</strong> family desired additional income to purchase

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!