Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
68<br />
lori reed<br />
person who articulates it: it exonerates, redeems, and purifi es him;<br />
it unburdens him of his wrongs, liberates him, and promises him<br />
salvation. (p. 62)<br />
Cole (1998) specifi cally addresses confession in <strong>the</strong> context of 12-step<br />
recovery programs as she argues that <strong>the</strong> recovering addict turns over his<br />
or her authority to a higher power, thus acknowledging <strong>the</strong> lack of free<br />
will and moral failure (p. 269). Yet, ra<strong>the</strong>r than view Glenda’s situation<br />
as ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> acquisition or lack of free will, addressing <strong>the</strong> particular<br />
activation of Glenda’s participation toward her own subjectifi cation<br />
and toward <strong>the</strong> production and formation of particular legitimations of<br />
computer use—toward a particular (and interested) Internet “temperance—is<br />
useful.” (See Miller, 1996, for a discussion of cultural citizenship<br />
and <strong>the</strong> “tempered” self.) Foucault (1978) outlines several delineations<br />
through which <strong>the</strong> ritual of confession is imbued with relations of power,<br />
including “through a clinical codifi cation of <strong>the</strong> inducement to speak,”<br />
“through <strong>the</strong> method of interpretation,” and “through <strong>the</strong> medicalization<br />
of <strong>the</strong> effects of confession” (pp. 65–67). In Glenda it becomes<br />
apparent how <strong>the</strong> inducement to speak, <strong>the</strong> subjection to an authoritative<br />
interpretant, and <strong>the</strong> medicalization of <strong>the</strong> effects of confession (translation<br />
of computer use through <strong>the</strong> med-psych apparatus of addiction)<br />
functions toward managing individual and social bodies. Glenda is<br />
both physically and internally separated—and separates herself—from<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs (“normal” computer users, “healthy” women) even while her new<br />
knowledge about her own irresponsibility and deviation from her true<br />
self heightens her susceptibility to a prescriptive normativity. Glenda’s<br />
“crisis” of identity is fur<strong>the</strong>r reinforced through a close-up of a computer<br />
screen which displays <strong>the</strong> question, “Who Am I?” She is encouraged to<br />
draw on an authoritative psychological vocabulary of which she is both<br />
<strong>the</strong> subject and <strong>the</strong> object. (See Nadeson, 1997, for a discussion of<br />
<strong>the</strong>se issues surrounding personality testing.) The addiction apparatus<br />
successfully transforms Glenda—and Glenda transforms herself—into a<br />
normal computer user and healthy woman/mo<strong>the</strong>r: a responsible cyborg<br />
citizen amid <strong>the</strong> threat of myriad alternatives.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> same time, Glenda’s narrative represents and manages a<br />
broader cultural crisis surrounding issues of “presence” as has been<br />
activated by technological change, and functions toward <strong>the</strong> production<br />
and eventually “stabilized” technohabitus that includes particularly structured<br />
relation among computers, bodies, identities, and selves. Stone<br />
(1996) and Derrida (1993), respectively, posit that “technosociality,”<br />
and “<strong>the</strong> technological condition,” including chemical and medical<br />
(re)constitutions of bodies, computer technologies, and formations of