30.12.2012 Views

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68<br />

lori reed<br />

person who articulates it: it exonerates, redeems, and purifi es him;<br />

it unburdens him of his wrongs, liberates him, and promises him<br />

salvation. (p. 62)<br />

Cole (1998) specifi cally addresses confession in <strong>the</strong> context of 12-step<br />

recovery programs as she argues that <strong>the</strong> recovering addict turns over his<br />

or her authority to a higher power, thus acknowledging <strong>the</strong> lack of free<br />

will and moral failure (p. 269). Yet, ra<strong>the</strong>r than view Glenda’s situation<br />

as ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> acquisition or lack of free will, addressing <strong>the</strong> particular<br />

activation of Glenda’s participation toward her own subjectifi cation<br />

and toward <strong>the</strong> production and formation of particular legitimations of<br />

computer use—toward a particular (and interested) Internet “temperance—is<br />

useful.” (See Miller, 1996, for a discussion of cultural citizenship<br />

and <strong>the</strong> “tempered” self.) Foucault (1978) outlines several delineations<br />

through which <strong>the</strong> ritual of confession is imbued with relations of power,<br />

including “through a clinical codifi cation of <strong>the</strong> inducement to speak,”<br />

“through <strong>the</strong> method of interpretation,” and “through <strong>the</strong> medicalization<br />

of <strong>the</strong> effects of confession” (pp. 65–67). In Glenda it becomes<br />

apparent how <strong>the</strong> inducement to speak, <strong>the</strong> subjection to an authoritative<br />

interpretant, and <strong>the</strong> medicalization of <strong>the</strong> effects of confession (translation<br />

of computer use through <strong>the</strong> med-psych apparatus of addiction)<br />

functions toward managing individual and social bodies. Glenda is<br />

both physically and internally separated—and separates herself—from<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs (“normal” computer users, “healthy” women) even while her new<br />

knowledge about her own irresponsibility and deviation from her true<br />

self heightens her susceptibility to a prescriptive normativity. Glenda’s<br />

“crisis” of identity is fur<strong>the</strong>r reinforced through a close-up of a computer<br />

screen which displays <strong>the</strong> question, “Who Am I?” She is encouraged to<br />

draw on an authoritative psychological vocabulary of which she is both<br />

<strong>the</strong> subject and <strong>the</strong> object. (See Nadeson, 1997, for a discussion of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se issues surrounding personality testing.) The addiction apparatus<br />

successfully transforms Glenda—and Glenda transforms herself—into a<br />

normal computer user and healthy woman/mo<strong>the</strong>r: a responsible cyborg<br />

citizen amid <strong>the</strong> threat of myriad alternatives.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> same time, Glenda’s narrative represents and manages a<br />

broader cultural crisis surrounding issues of “presence” as has been<br />

activated by technological change, and functions toward <strong>the</strong> production<br />

and eventually “stabilized” technohabitus that includes particularly structured<br />

relation among computers, bodies, identities, and selves. Stone<br />

(1996) and Derrida (1993), respectively, posit that “technosociality,”<br />

and “<strong>the</strong> technological condition,” including chemical and medical<br />

(re)constitutions of bodies, computer technologies, and formations of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!