30.12.2012 Views

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64<br />

lori reed<br />

In time, computer manufacturers and marketers realized that in order<br />

to move <strong>the</strong> computer into <strong>the</strong> home successfully, <strong>the</strong>y had to encourage<br />

<strong>the</strong> comfortable and profi cient female computer user. Advertisers began<br />

to market <strong>the</strong> computer to <strong>the</strong> female user in ways it had not previously<br />

(Lewyn, 1990), and women’s magazines such as Ladies Home Journal<br />

(Asimov, 1983; Hait, 1983) and Good Housekeeping (“I Couldn’t Learn,”<br />

1987) included advice regarding how women could overcome computer<br />

fear to use computers confi dently. Women were advised to stop viewing<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir computers as tools and to, instead, view <strong>the</strong>m as “appliances,” just<br />

like a toaster, washing machine, or any o<strong>the</strong>r household convenience<br />

(Van Gelder, 1983, 1985, pp. 89–91). Computer classes especially for<br />

women helped to produce confi dent computer users (“A Computer<br />

Lesson,” 1984). As women became increasingly competent computer<br />

users during <strong>the</strong> 1970s and 1980s, <strong>the</strong> discourse on computers converged<br />

with contemporaneous and emergent debates regarding “women’s rights”<br />

and a woman’s “correct” place in <strong>the</strong> family and society. Isaac Asimov, for<br />

example, advocated that “one of <strong>the</strong> most signifi cant uses for computers<br />

[will be], that of fi nally raising <strong>the</strong> role of women in <strong>the</strong> world to full<br />

equality with that of men” (p. 66). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, a prominent<br />

conservative fi gure announced, “We are against <strong>the</strong> women’s rights<br />

movement . . . and we are very concerned about <strong>the</strong> growing menace of<br />

home computers” (quoted in Van Gelder, p. 36). And it made perfect<br />

sense when Ms. Magazine provided guidance and instruction on how a<br />

woman could fi nd herself “falling in love with [her] computer” (p. 36).<br />

So while <strong>the</strong> manufacture of female computerphilia was necessary and<br />

benefi cial to <strong>the</strong> computer industry, it simultaneously raised cultural<br />

anxieties about how <strong>the</strong> machine might threaten traditional gender and<br />

family roles. As a result, much of <strong>the</strong> 1990s discourse on computer can<br />

also be seen as a prescriptive and mediating discourse on gender, <strong>the</strong><br />

family, and <strong>the</strong> politics of domestic space (cf. Cassidy, 2001).<br />

When Love Turns to Obsession: Assembling<br />

Healthy Women and Healthy Families<br />

Into <strong>the</strong> 1990s, women increasingly used computers at home and questions<br />

continued about just how computer technologies could and should<br />

be incorporated into people’s lives. Who should use computers? For what<br />

purpose? Where should <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong>m? How should <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong>m? What<br />

are <strong>the</strong> dangers pertaining to computer use? As Marvin (1988) describes<br />

in her history of “new” media, “new media intrude on existing habits<br />

and organizations and new media provide new platforms on which old<br />

groups confront one ano<strong>the</strong>r. Old habits of transacting between groups

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!