Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Disciplining <strong>the</strong> Ethnic <strong>Body</strong> 209<br />
industry perceived and addressed U.S. Latina and Latino audiences<br />
as ethnically undifferentiated, racially non-White, Spanish-dominant,<br />
socioeconomically poor, and most often of Mexican origin (Rodriguez,<br />
1999). Such a construction had very specifi c effects: Throughout <strong>the</strong><br />
1970s and 1980s, this market framework promoted <strong>the</strong> development of<br />
Spanish-language narrow-casting via networks such as Telemundo and<br />
Univisión and encouraged <strong>the</strong> exclusion of Latinas and Latinos from<br />
mainstream English-language network programming.<br />
However, beginning in <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s Latina and Latino industry<br />
offi cials worked diligently to reframe dominant marketing discourses<br />
about <strong>the</strong> U.S. Latino audience: by highlighting projected increases in<br />
U.S. Latina and Latino population; <strong>the</strong> commercial profi ts from duallanguage<br />
marketing; and, <strong>the</strong> existence of more than 1 million Latina<br />
and Latino households with incomes of more than $50,000 living in <strong>the</strong><br />
United States, Latina and Latino industry offi cials effectively redefi ned<br />
mainstream industry perceptions about <strong>the</strong> economic importance of <strong>the</strong><br />
Latina and Latino consumer audience while still using homogenizing<br />
constructions of Latinas and Latinos to differentiate <strong>the</strong>m as a market<br />
(Dávila, 2001; Rodriguez, 1999; Sinclair, 1999). In <strong>the</strong> overall global<br />
economic climate that includes <strong>the</strong> identity-making practice of “shopping<br />
for ethnicities,” advertising trade magazines and marketing research<br />
corporations increased spending levels on “Hispanic” marketing in <strong>the</strong><br />
late 1980s (Goodson & Shaver, 1994, p. 192; Halter 2000). If marketing<br />
strategies function as a Foucauldian form of discourse, “as a set of practices<br />
which support particular forms of knowledge or ways of knowing”<br />
(Foucault quoted in Rabinow, 1984, p. 54), <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> ruptures and<br />
discontinuities within <strong>the</strong> marketing and global entertainment industry<br />
texts point to potentially resistant moments of transformations.<br />
Within this particular historical context, strong demand from Latin<br />
American audiences for U.S. programming, as well from U.S. Latina<br />
and Latino audiences for more inclusive programming have increased<br />
<strong>the</strong> production of fi lm and television shows and marketable stars that<br />
appeal to audiences across a matrix of race, ethnicity, gender, and<br />
class throughout <strong>the</strong> late 1990s. Warner Bro<strong>the</strong>r’s 1997 Selena starring<br />
Jennifer Lopez specifi cally targeted Latin American audiences, U.S.<br />
Latina and Latino audiences, and young U.S. girls across all ethnic<br />
categories (Hindes, 1997). Celebrities Shakira and Thalia both began<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir cross-over attempts without English fl uency yet that did not stop<br />
<strong>the</strong> marketing apparatus from widely promoting <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> United<br />
States. Currently <strong>the</strong> commodifi cation of Latinidad relies primarily of<br />
Latina bodies.