30.12.2012 Views

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pink Ribbons Inc. 87<br />

consent of <strong>the</strong> patient, is also widely acknowledged as a turning point in<br />

<strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> disease (Brenner, 2000; Ehrenreich, 2001; Klawiter,<br />

2000; Lerner 2001). Kushner’s exposé prompted a decade of nationwide<br />

campaigning for informed consent legislation at <strong>the</strong> state level, and as<br />

activist and advocacy groups sprung up around <strong>the</strong> country, a national<br />

movement began to emerge.<br />

Through a variety of research techniques (journalistic and academic)<br />

and disciplinary foci, authors such as Roberta Altman (1996), Sharon<br />

Batt (1994), Barbara Brenner (2000), Maren Klawiter (2000), Ellen<br />

Leopold (1999a, Barron Lerner (2001), Alisa Solomon (1992), and<br />

Carole Stabiner (1997) trace <strong>the</strong> consolidation of this movement into<br />

an effective political force. These authors view <strong>the</strong> founding of <strong>the</strong><br />

National Alliance of Breast Cancer Organizations (NABCO) in 1986 and<br />

<strong>the</strong> creation of <strong>the</strong> National Breast Cancer Coalition (NBCC) fi ve years<br />

later as central to this process. 2 As a result of NBCC campaigning, in<br />

particular, federal government funding for breast cancer has increased<br />

dramatically (from $40 million in 1981, to $407 million in 1993, to<br />

$605 million in 2005), and breast cancer activists now enjoy a more<br />

active role in research funding decision processes and in research<br />

agenda setting.<br />

Maren Klawiter (2000) offers one of <strong>the</strong> most compelling accounts<br />

of this history, making visible <strong>the</strong> connections between changes in<br />

<strong>the</strong> medical management of breast cancer, <strong>the</strong> destigmatization of <strong>the</strong><br />

disease, and <strong>the</strong> growth of activism. She shows how a multiplication<br />

of treatment regimens, a proliferation of support groups, and <strong>the</strong><br />

expansion of screening into asymptomatic populations during <strong>the</strong><br />

1980s and 1990s helped produce new social spaces, solidarities, and<br />

sensibilities among breast cancer survivors and activists. In o<strong>the</strong>r words,<br />

changes in <strong>the</strong> treatment of women by <strong>the</strong> medical profession—changes<br />

preceded by fledgling activism—opened up numerous spaces in which<br />

women could talk openly about <strong>the</strong>ir experiences of <strong>the</strong> disease with<br />

one ano<strong>the</strong>r, thus enabling <strong>the</strong> emergence of a multifaceted breast<br />

cancer movement.<br />

This chapter builds on <strong>the</strong>se analyses by tracing <strong>the</strong> materialization<br />

of <strong>the</strong> “breast cancer survivor” as a category of identifi cation by focusing<br />

in particular on a hi<strong>the</strong>rto neglected but absolutely central force in<br />

<strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> breast cancer movement: <strong>the</strong> role of corporate<br />

philanthropy. 3 More specifi cally, it explores how breast cancer-directed<br />

corporate philanthropy has shaped <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> breast cancer<br />

survivor as a category of identifi cation and <strong>the</strong> effects of this confi guration<br />

on <strong>the</strong> ways that <strong>the</strong> “problem of breast cancer” is understood and<br />

responded to.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!