30.12.2012 Views

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140<br />

kristin a. swenson<br />

consumer items including <strong>the</strong> new technological household appliances<br />

(Weiss, 2000).<br />

Howard Kaltenborn at <strong>the</strong> 1957 National Manpower Council meeting<br />

explained <strong>the</strong> rationale behind hiring married women:<br />

These older women, as a group, constitute <strong>the</strong> least effectively utilized<br />

sector of our working population. [We] will [have] to employ <strong>the</strong>m in<br />

increasing numbers in business, industry, and government in order<br />

to meet <strong>the</strong> nation’s manpower needs and to insure <strong>the</strong> continued<br />

prosperity and growth of our national economy. (cited in Blackwelder,<br />

1997, p. 161)<br />

Kaltenborn recognized that married women were an untapped paid<br />

labor force and could be subsumed readily into labor, exploited as parttime<br />

wage earners. The recognition that this previously untapped source<br />

for wage labor was ripe for exploitation was not lost on employers. As<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Manpower Council advocated <strong>the</strong> hiring of female laborers<br />

for part-time work, its members touted <strong>the</strong> benefi ts of hiring married<br />

part-time workers by explaining that <strong>the</strong>y could easily be laid off during<br />

an economic downturn and rehired during growth periods. Part-time<br />

work and fl exible work schedules exploited <strong>the</strong> previously untapped<br />

female labor force while saving employers a signifi cant amount in wages<br />

and benefi ts (see Blackwelder, 1997, pp. 162–163). 8<br />

During <strong>the</strong> 1960s <strong>the</strong> number of wage earning women increased from<br />

“23 million to well over 31 million, and female labor force participation<br />

increased from 37.7% to 43.3%” (Blackwelder, 1997, p. 177). Women<br />

entered <strong>the</strong> wage-earning labor force in increasing numbers, but unlike<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1950s, middle-class and working-class mo<strong>the</strong>rs maintained a constant<br />

relationship to wage labor, and many, including mo<strong>the</strong>rs with infants and<br />

toddlers, accepted full-time employment (see Blackwelder, 1997; Jenson<br />

et al., 1988). During <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s, <strong>the</strong> labor demand expanded<br />

and women continued to fi ll <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> growing economic and<br />

services industry. Regardless of class and family status, more women were<br />

seeking employment out of economic need as <strong>the</strong> cost of living continued<br />

to rise. By <strong>the</strong> 1970s, <strong>the</strong> services industry surpassed manufacturing<br />

and by <strong>the</strong> 1980s services-sector jobs accounted for 65% of <strong>the</strong> national<br />

income (Blackwelder, 1997, p. 6). The labor market was in continual<br />

need of services-sector employees and because services positions were<br />

traditionally segregated as women’s work, and as women’s fi nancial<br />

status required <strong>the</strong> necessity to earn a wage to support <strong>the</strong>mselves and<br />

to contribute to <strong>the</strong>ir families, women were fur<strong>the</strong>r ingrained into <strong>the</strong><br />

labor force.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!