30.12.2012 Views

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

the Female Body GOVERNING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes<br />

“It’s Down To You” 37<br />

1. Beetham (1996) draws on Kristeva’s account of feminine psychology to<br />

argue that <strong>the</strong> qualities of women’s magazines, such as having more than one<br />

authorial voice, <strong>the</strong> mixing of medias and genres, and resisting closure, meet<br />

or refl ect <strong>the</strong> psychology of its readers.<br />

2. “In contemporary western culture, we are encouraged to think of ourselves<br />

as coherent stories of success, progress and movement. Loss and failure have<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir place but only as part of a broader picture of ascendance” (Stacey, 1997,<br />

p. 9).<br />

3. This analysis is taken from a study funded by <strong>the</strong> Arts and Humanities<br />

Research Board, “Inventing <strong>the</strong> Psychological: Lifestyle Magazines and <strong>the</strong><br />

Fiction of Autonomous Selfhood,” AN6596/APN10894. My thanks extend to<br />

<strong>the</strong> research assistant, Dr. Laura Miller.<br />

4. “Anchored in <strong>the</strong> familiar stories of progress, of liberation, and of <strong>the</strong> pursuit<br />

of knowledge, individualized accounts of global self-health condense <strong>the</strong><br />

grand metanarratives of modernity, reconnecting individuals back into <strong>the</strong><br />

universal narrative of modernity” (Franklin et al., 2000, p. 136)<br />

5. See a development of <strong>the</strong>se ideas in relation to <strong>the</strong> concepts, explanatory<br />

structures, and “rules of truth,” which psychiatry has developed to distinguish<br />

<strong>the</strong> so-called hallucination from <strong>the</strong> pseudo-hallucination (Blackman,<br />

2001).<br />

6. As Morley (1992) argues, <strong>the</strong> key concern is to explore, “how members of<br />

different groups and classes, sharing different cultural codes, will interpret a<br />

given message differently, not just at <strong>the</strong> personal, idiosyncratic level, but in a<br />

way systematically linked to <strong>the</strong>ir socio-economic position” (p. 88).<br />

References<br />

Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied o<strong>the</strong>rs in post-coloniality. New York:<br />

Routledge.<br />

Ballaster, R. (1991). Women’s worlds: Ideology, femininity and <strong>the</strong> women’s magazine.<br />

London: Macmillan.<br />

Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001). Individualization. London: Sage.<br />

Beetham, M. (1996). A magazine of her own? Domesticity and desire in <strong>the</strong> women’s<br />

magazine 1800–1914. London: Routledge.<br />

Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.<br />

Billig, M., et al. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. A social psychology of everyday thinking.<br />

London: Sage.<br />

Billig, M. (1997). From codes to utterances: Cultural studies, discourse and<br />

psychology. In P. Golding & M. Ferguson (Eds.), Beyond cultural studies<br />

(pp. 205–226). London: Sage.<br />

Blackman, L. (1996). The dangerous classes: Re-telling <strong>the</strong> psychiatric story.<br />

Feminism and Psychology, 6(3), 361–379.<br />

Blackman, L. (1999). An extraordinary life: The legacy of an ambivalence. In<br />

Diana and democracy [Special issue]. New Formations, 36, 111–124.<br />

Blackman, L. (2001). Hearing voices: Embodiment and experience. London: Free<br />

Association.<br />

Blackman, L. (2004). Self-help, media cultures and <strong>the</strong> production of female<br />

psychopathology. Cultural Studies, 7(2), 241–258.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!