Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Productive Bodies 151<br />
is often extended beyond objective conditions to include <strong>the</strong> inability<br />
to manipulate or control fully <strong>the</strong> amorphous condition in which <strong>the</strong><br />
worker is required to survive. The depressed takes on as his or her own<br />
fault <strong>the</strong> mutable, unstable status of his or her own subjectivity. This<br />
subjectivity, as has been argued, is mirrored in <strong>the</strong> model of capitalist<br />
organization of postindustrial labor. Both <strong>the</strong> environment of work,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> essential condition of <strong>the</strong> subject within it, lack stability and are<br />
defined by <strong>the</strong>ir fluidity, mutability, and essential lack of ground. While<br />
this condition of subjectivity and work is dominant today, <strong>the</strong> depressed<br />
blames <strong>the</strong> self for his or her lack of ground or stability in all areas of<br />
life. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> example in <strong>the</strong> DSM-IV is already dated because<br />
it suggests a concrete objective relation as <strong>the</strong> site for self-blame. This<br />
would assume that if one did get <strong>the</strong> sales or attain <strong>the</strong> goal than one<br />
would not be depressed. Today, <strong>the</strong> pervasive form of depression can<br />
be understood as literally objectless. The only stability <strong>the</strong> depressed<br />
person has is <strong>the</strong> internalization of <strong>the</strong> unstable relations in which he<br />
or she lives. 13 This condition allows for a particularly intense form of<br />
self-governance; whereas <strong>the</strong> depressed is diagnosed as “sick” he is,<br />
never<strong>the</strong>less, because of <strong>the</strong> self-blame for his own instability, arguably,<br />
<strong>the</strong> most willing and able worker in this economy.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Antidepressants in <strong>the</strong> age of a feminized labor force produce a feminine<br />
subjectivity that is productive for capital. The depressed subject is<br />
still directed toward <strong>the</strong> self—today by mass-mediated institutions—but<br />
<strong>the</strong> remedy that <strong>the</strong> self is directed toward is that offered by psychotropic<br />
pharmaceuticals. The blame for depression still lies within <strong>the</strong><br />
individual. There is no external object to blame and because this<br />
blame is directed toward <strong>the</strong> self, it becomes a form of self-resentment,<br />
requiring <strong>the</strong> individual to seek his own treatment and to “overcome”<br />
himself; literally, to become someone else at <strong>the</strong> level of one’s affective<br />
being. The shift to biopower produces a different form of governance<br />
that works through <strong>the</strong> body to alter its biological functions to produce<br />
<strong>the</strong> affects that correspond to <strong>the</strong> qualifications necessary for work.<br />
Antidepressants assist in <strong>the</strong> production and performance of affective<br />
qualities that are necessary for today’s model worker, suggesting that<br />
depression can be productive, and perhaps necessary, within contemporary<br />
models of work.<br />
The relation between depression and work continues to intensify. In<br />
a disciplinary society, <strong>the</strong> depressed were encouraged to seek refuge